Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer modification that stresses both CPU and GPU heavily, and the data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile shows a system that is capable of strong 1080p play but begins to buckle under the weight of 4K resolutions. This combination ranks 2264th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the pack, which suggests that while it can handle the game, there are many faster configurations available. The measured frame rates reveal a clear narrative about where the bottleneck lies, and the following sections break down the specific numbers and what they mean for a prospective player.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling of average FPS across resolutions is the most telling metric for this combo, as it demonstrates a steep performance cliff when moving from 1080p to 4K. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo delivers a solid 106 FPS average, but dropping the resolution to 2560x1440 reduces that to 70 FPS, a 34% decrease. Pushing further to 3840x2160 at High settings yields just 39 FPS, which is a 63% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This pattern strongly indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the frame rate drops are far more drastic than what a CPU-bound scenario would produce.

The data for Low settings reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p Low, the system hits 168 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate to suggest the CPU is still feeding the GPU adequately. At 1440p Low, the average drops to 111 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 61 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is a 64% drop, almost identical to the High settings drop. This consistency across settings levels is a hallmark of a GPU bottleneck, as the graphics card's raw pixel throughput is the limiting factor regardless of the visual fidelity being requested.

Looking at the frame rate deltas more closely, the step from 1080p to 1440p at High settings (106 to 70 FPS) represents a loss of 36 FPS, while the step from 1440p to 4K (70 to 39 FPS) is a loss of 31 FPS. The similarity in these absolute losses suggests that the GPU's fillrate is being saturated in a fairly linear fashion as pixel count increases. For a player with a 1440p monitor, this combo will require settings tuning to maintain a smooth experience, as the 70 FPS average at High is workable but not ideal for fast-paced multiplayer scenarios, and the 54 FPS at Ultra will be noticeably less fluid.

The 4K results are effectively unplayable for competitive play, with the 39 FPS average at High and 30 FPS at Ultra falling well below the 60 FPS threshold that most players consider the minimum for a responsive experience. Even dropping to Low settings at 4K only recovers 61 FPS, which is marginal. The data clearly shows that this configuration is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can push high refresh rates on High settings (106 FPS) and even approach 144Hz territory on Low (168 FPS).

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution, as the combo delivers 106 FPS at High settings and 168 FPS at Low settings. At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 70 FPS and 111 FPS respectively, which is still playable but requires compromises on settings for a smooth experience.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: The data indicates that 4K is not viable for this combo. At 3840x2160, the average FPS is 39 at High, 48 at Medium, and 30 at Ultra. Even at Low settings, the average is only 61 FPS, which means that achieving a consistently smooth 60+ FPS experience at 4K is not possible across the settings range.

Q: How does the Ultra settings profile perform compared to High?

A: At 1080p, the drop from High to Ultra is significant, with the average FPS falling from 106 to 82, a 23% reduction. At 1440p, the drop is from 70 to 54 FPS, and at 4K, it is from 39 to 30 FPS. The Ultra preset demands substantially more from the GPU, making it less suitable for maintaining high frame rates.

Q: Is the game more CPU-bound or GPU-bound for this configuration?

A: The benchmark results indicate a strong GPU bottleneck, particularly at higher resolutions. The consistent frame rate drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p and 4K, across all settings levels, point to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile being the limiting factor. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and High settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS at Low is 111, while at High it is 70. This represents a 41 FPS difference, or a 37% reduction in frame rate when moving from Low to High. The Medium setting sits in between at 87 FPS, providing a balanced option.

Q: Does the combo's rank in Fivem reflect its overall performance?

A: The combo ranks 2264th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the 61st percentile. This indicates that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it outperforms a majority of tested systems, but there are many faster combinations for this specific game.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the primary driver of Fivem's visual output, and its specifications directly explain the measured frame rates. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, which provides a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is a critical factor for texture streaming and asset loading in Fivem's open-world environment, and the data suggests it is sufficient for 1080p but becomes a constraint at higher resolutions where the demand for memory bandwidth increases exponentially.

The core clocks are listed as a base of 1545 MHz and a boost of 1890 MHz, which are modest figures for the Ada Lovelace architecture. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 48 ROPs are responsible for pixel output, and the 90.72 GPixel/s pixel rate highlights its capability at lower resolutions. The measured FPS values at 1080p High (106 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (82 FPS) show that the GPU has enough raw power to handle the game's rendering load at this resolution, but the steep decline at 4K (39 FPS High) points to the pixel rate and memory bandwidth being overwhelmed.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is another aspect to consider, though the data does not explicitly show a capacity-related crash or stutter. Fivem can be memory-hungry with many custom assets, but the benchmark results at 1080p and 1440p do not indicate a hard limitation at those resolutions. The transition to 4K shows a more pronounced performance drop, which aligns with the GPU's 256.0 GB/s bandwidth being insufficient for the pixel fill demands of 4K rendering.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, which is 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and 1.3% below the Intel Arc B580. This places the mobile GPU in a competitive position against older desktop parts, but its performance in Fivem is still constrained by its mobile form factor and power envelope of 115 W. The data shows that for this specific game, the GPU is the clear bottleneck at resolutions above 1080p, and players should prioritize lowering resolution over reducing other settings to gain meaningful frame rate improvements.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers robust frame rates across the board: Low averages 168 FPS, Medium averages 133 FPS with a minimum of 113 and a maximum of 153, High averages 106 FPS, and Ultra averages 82 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1080p is the sweet spot for this configuration, with even the most demanding Ultra preset remaining comfortably above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are immediate and substantial. Low settings produce 111 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS with a range of 74 to 100, High averages 70 FPS, and Ultra falls to 54 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 74 FPS shows that there are dips below the average, which could be noticeable in busy multiplayer sessions. The Ultra preset's 54 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that players will need to use High or lower settings for a consistently smooth 1440p experience.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings average 61 FPS, Medium averages 48 FPS with a range of 41 to 56, High averages 39 FPS, and Ultra drops to 30 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 41 FPS highlights significant frame time spikes, which would be disruptive in a game that requires quick reactions. The 30 FPS at Ultra is effectively a slideshow for multiplayer gameplay, and even the 61 FPS at Low is marginal for competitive play.

The data pattern across all resolutions shows a consistent relationship between settings levels. At each resolution, the jump from Low to Medium costs roughly 20-25% of the frame rate, the jump from Medium to High costs another 20-25%, and the jump from High to Ultra costs another 20-25%. This linear scaling suggests that the GPU is being pushed harder with each settings increase, and there are no unexpected bottlenecks or thermal throttling events visible in the average FPS figures.

How This Combo Ranks

In Fivem, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile ranks 2264th out of 3707 tested combos. This places it in the 39th percentile from the top, meaning that roughly 61% of tested configurations perform better in this game. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the CPU's strong benchmark scores, but it underscores the importance of the GPU in Fivem's performance equation.

The CPU alone has an average benchmark score of 63173, which places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13790F at 63080 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G at 63331 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at 62839 (0.5% lower). This indicates that the CPU is a high-performing part, but the combo's overall rank in Fivem is dragged down by the GPU's limitations.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 22729, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT at 22549 (0.8% lower), and the Intel Arc B580 at 23021 (1.3% higher). The GPU's percentile rank is significantly lower than the CPU's, which explains why the combo rank is in the middle of the pack rather than near the top.

The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile (93rd) and the combo's lower rank (39th percentile) highlights that Fivem is heavily GPU-limited for this configuration. A player with this combo would see significant performance gains from upgrading the GPU, while the CPU would likely not be the limiting factor. The data suggests that this is a balanced mid-range gaming laptop combo that excels at 1080p but is not competitive at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a powerful mobile processor with 20 cores and 20 threads, running at a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per core L2 cache provide ample capacity for game logic and physics calculations. The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40642 and a single-core score of 5737, which places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is to handle the complex multiplayer simulation, including player positions, vehicle physics, and server-side script execution. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is able to feed the GPU sufficiently, as evidenced by the 168 FPS average at Low settings. This high frame rate indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck at this resolution, as the GPU is still able to render frames quickly enough to keep up with the CPU's output.

However, the CPU's performance does not fully compensate for the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. The 20-core, 20-thread configuration is well-suited for multi-threaded workloads, and the Passmark multi-thread score of 47985 reflects strong parallel processing capability. The single-thread score of 4500 on Passmark is also robust, which is important for Fivem's many single-threaded game logic tasks.

The CPU's memory support for DDR5 with a dual-channel configuration and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for feeding the GPU with data. The 17,800 million transistors on a 3 nm process node from TSMC indicate a modern, efficient design, and the 55 W TDP suggests it can sustain high clocks under load without excessive power draw. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo, and its performance headroom means that it could support a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

The nearest rivals for the CPU include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, which has a 0.7% lower average benchmark score, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, which is 0.2% higher. These small deltas indicate that the 265HX is competitively positioned within its performance class, and its 20-core design provides a solid foundation for gaming and productivity tasks. For Fivem specifically, the CPU's capabilities are more than sufficient, and the measured frame rates at 1080p confirm that it can deliver high FPS when paired with a capable GPU.