Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer modification for Grand Theft Auto V, and the measured performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reveals a system that is heavily influenced by both resolution and graphical preset. The data provided shows a clear hierarchy of performance across three resolutions and four quality settings, offering a practical look at how this specific combination handles the game's unique CPU and GPU load.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K produces a dramatic and consistent drop in frame rates across all settings, which is expected given the increasing pixel count. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 194 at 1920x1080 to 128 at 2560x1440, and then to 71 at 3840x2160. This represents a 34% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 45% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The pattern is similar at Low settings, where the average FPS drops from 308 at 1080p to 203 at 1440p and finally to 112 at 4K, showing that even at the lowest preset, the sheer number of pixels at 4K takes a significant toll on the GPU.

The scaling behavior indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution increases. At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, suggesting that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to maintain such numbers. However, the steep decline at 4K, where the average FPS at Ultra settings is just 55, points to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER being the bottleneck. The gap between settings also widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 157 FPS (308 vs 151), but at 4K, this gap shrinks to 57 FPS (112 vs 55). This compression of performance at 4K further confirms that the GPU's rendering limits are being reached, regardless of the quality preset, as the workload becomes more pixel-bound than scene-complexity-bound. The data suggests that for a smooth 4K experience, the user must significantly lower settings, while 1440p offers a much more comfortable performance envelope with headroom for higher quality presets.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Its benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 and a single-core score of 5960. In Passmark tests, it achieves a multi-thread score of 49682 and a single-thread score of 4689. These numbers place the CPU in the 93rd percentile of all tested CPUs, indicating it is a high-performing part. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD EPYC 4464P, show a negligible performance delta of just -0.3%, confirming that the Intel chip is competitive at the top tier of processor performance.

In the context of Fivem, the CPU's role is less about raw multi-core throughput and more about sustained single-core and moderate multi-thread performance. The game's engine, originally built for older hardware, often struggles with high core counts but benefits significantly from strong single-core performance. The Core Ultra 7 265's high boost clock of 5.30 GHz and its strong single-core benchmark scores are critical for maintaining high frame rates, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The near-identical performance of the Core Ultra 7 265F, with a deltaPct of 0.3%, suggests that the integrated graphics on the 265 are not a factor in this game, as the discrete GPU handles all rendering tasks. The data indicates that the CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p, where the load on the processor is highest relative to the GPU. The CPU's performance is not the limiting factor in this configuration; rather, it provides a solid foundation that allows the GPU to be the main driver of frame rate differences across settings and resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a 16 GB GDDR6X card with a 256-bit memory bus and a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. Its base clock is 2340 MHz with a boost clock of 2610 MHz. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 31811 in Passmark G3D and 5569 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, has a deltaPct of -0.4%, showing that the 4070 Ti SUPER is a solidly mid-to-high-range performer, though not at the very top of the spectrum.

The GPU's role in Fivem becomes increasingly dominant as resolution and settings are increased. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 55 clearly shows the GPU is struggling to maintain playable frame rates. The 16 GB of VRAM is a substantial amount, but the game's high-resolution textures and draw distances can still push memory usage, though the data does not provide specific VRAM usage figures. The card's memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s is crucial for feeding the GPU's 8448 shading units, which are tasked with rendering the dense, populated environments typical of Fivem servers. The performance drop from High to Ultra at 4K (71 to 55 FPS) is a 22.5% reduction, indicating that the Ultra preset introduces settings that heavily tax the GPU. The card's performance relative to its rivals, such as the NVIDIA TITAN RTX which is -1.9% slower, shows it is a capable 1440p and 1080p performer, but the data makes it clear that 4K gaming requires significant compromises in visual fidelity. The boost clock of 2610 MHz helps maintain performance under load, but the overall architecture is simply not powerful enough to deliver high frame rates at 4K with this game's heavy draw calls and particle effects.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 308, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Is this system capable of smooth 4K gameplay in Fivem?

A: The data shows 4K performance is limited. At High settings, the average FPS is 71, and at Ultra it drops to 55. A 4K experience is possible, but only with lower settings presets, and even then, frame rates may not be ideal for competitive play.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64640, which is -0.3% lower than the AMD EPYC 4464P's score of 64823, making their performance essentially identical.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset yields an average FPS of 160, while High yields 128. This is a 32 FPS difference, favoring Medium for higher frame rates.

Q: Does the GPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks align with its Fivem performance?

A: The GPU's 76th percentile ranking and a Passmark G3D score of 31811 indicate a strong mid-range card. This aligns with its Fivem performance, where it excels at 1080p and 1440p but struggles at 4K, particularly on Ultra settings.

Q: Which CPU is a direct competitor to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 based on average score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a direct competitor, with an average score of 64438 and a deltaPct of 0.3% compared to the 265's score, meaning they are virtually tied in performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds the rank of 287 out of 3005 tested combos. This places it in the top 9.5% of all systems tested, which is a strong showing. The high ranking is likely driven by the CPU's excellent multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, which prevents it from bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU, while not a top-tier flagship, provides sufficient performance to secure a high overall position.

The rank of 287 indicates that this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database. However, it is not at the absolute top, which is expected given that the GPU is in the 76th percentile, not the 90th or higher. The combination's strength lies in its balance; the CPU is more powerful than the GPU, which means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform exceptionally well. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming, the system's rank would be lower than its overall position suggests, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor. For a user targeting high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p gaming, this combo is well-optimized, as the CPU can push high frame rates and the GPU is fast enough to render them. The ranking confirms that this is a high-performance pairing for Fivem, particularly for users who prioritize smooth, high-FPS gameplay over maximum resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a 1920x1080 display, the High preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average FPS of 194, which is well above the 144Hz threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset also offers excellent performance at 243 FPS, but the visual jump from Medium to High is generally worth the 49 FPS loss for most users. The Low preset at 308 FPS is only necessary for users with 240Hz or higher displays who prioritize maximum frame rate over all else. The Ultra preset, at 151 FPS, is also viable for 144Hz monitors, but the gains over High are often marginal in a game like Fivem, where player density and server-side factors can cause frame drops.

For 2560x1440 resolution, the Medium preset is the recommended sweet spot, providing an average FPS of 160, which is ideal for 144Hz gaming. The High preset, at 128 FPS, is also a strong option for users with 120Hz or 144Hz displays, offering better visual quality with only a 32 FPS penalty. The Low preset at 203 FPS is overkill for most 1440p monitors, and the Ultra preset, at 99 FPS, is playable but may feel less smooth, especially in busy areas with many players. For 3840x2160 4K displays, the data shows that the Low preset, with an average FPS of 112, is the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset, at 89 FPS, is playable if you can tolerate a lower frame rate, but the High preset at 71 FPS and Ultra at 55 FPS are not recommended for a satisfying experience. In summary, for the best balance of visual quality and performance, use High at 1080p, Medium at 1440p, and Low at 4K.