Fivem

The Intel Core i7-14700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER combination delivers a strong performance profile in Fivem, with measured data showing it ranks 190th out of 1792 tested combos. This places the pairing in the top 11% of all configurations, a solid result for a multiplayer title where frame consistency matters. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, sits in the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component is a glaring bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings for this combo?

A: The measured average FPS is 151.7 at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings. This drops from 304.5 at Low settings, showing a significant performance cost for maximum visual fidelity.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700K compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 70074, which is essentially identical to the i7-14700KF’s 70104, showing a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X scores 70420, placing it 0.5% ahead of the i7-14700K.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and size?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is substantial for handling high-resolution textures in Fivem.

Q: What is the best resolution for achieving over 200 FPS with this setup?

A: At 2560x1440 with Low settings, the combo achieves 202.9 FPS. At 1920x1080, both Low and Medium settings exceed 200 FPS, with 304.5 and 243.2 FPS respectively. High settings at 1440p drop to 125.2 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER rank against the NVIDIA RTX A2000?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 48704, which is 1.6% higher than the RTX A2000’s 47915. The NVIDIA CMP 50HX scores 49071, putting it 0.7% ahead of the 4070 Ti SUPER.

Q: Is the performance data measured or estimated?

A: The data is marked as `dataIsMeasured: true`, indicating that the FPS figures come from direct testing rather than synthetic projections. This lends credibility to the reported numbers.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. Its 8448 shading units and 66 RT cores work together to handle Fivem’s rendering demands. The GPU’s boost clock of 2610 MHz, paired with a base clock of 2340 MHz, provides the raw throughput needed for high refresh rates. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, running at 21 Gbps effective, delivers a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s, which is critical for loading the detailed environments and player models common in multiplayer sessions.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced as settings increase. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: at 1080p Low, the system hits 304.5 FPS, but at Ultra, it falls to 151.7 FPS. This 152.8 FPS drop illustrates how the GPU’s shading units and memory bandwidth are taxed by higher-quality textures and effects. The GPU holds the 86th percentile among all tested graphics cards, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, scores only 0.7% higher on average, suggesting the 4070 Ti SUPER is well-positioned for demanding titles like Fivem. The RTX A2000, a competitor, trails by 1.6%, reinforcing the 4070 Ti SUPER’s standing.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 190 out of 1792 tested configurations places this pairing in the 89.4th percentile of all combos. This is a strong showing, especially considering Fivem is a multiplayer title that often stresses CPU performance due to server-side physics and player interactions. The Intel Core i7-14700K, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, excels in this environment. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44534 and single-core score of 6287 indicate robust processing power, which is essential for handling the game’s simulation logic alongside the GPU’s rendering tasks.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which has a nearly identical average score of 70104 versus the i7-14700K’s 70074, a 0% delta. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69887, only 0.3% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X leads with 70420, a 0.5% advantage. These differences are marginal, meaning the i7-14700K is not a limiting factor in this setup. The GPU, ranking 86th percentile, complements the CPU well, ensuring that at 1440p and 4K, the graphics card becomes the primary driver of performance, as evidenced by the FPS scaling across resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. Starting at 1920x1080, the combo delivers 304.5 FPS at Low, 243.2 FPS at Medium, 191.6 FPS at High, and 151.7 FPS at Ultra. These numbers show that even at Ultra, the system maintains a high refresh rate, making it suitable for competitive play. The gap between Low and Ultra is 152.8 FPS, indicating that the GPU is capable of handling the extra load without dropping below playable thresholds.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings yield 202.9 FPS, Medium produces 159.6 FPS, High drops to 125.2 FPS, and Ultra settles at 97.3 FPS. The 105.6 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is less severe than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is becoming more of a bottleneck as pixel count increases. The 4K results at 3840x2160 show 113.2 FPS at Low, 89.8 FPS at Medium, 69.9 FPS at High, and 52.7 FPS at Ultra. These figures reveal that 4K Ultra is demanding, but still playable, with the 52.7 FPS average staying above the 30 FPS console baseline.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals the limiting component. At Low settings, the system moves from 304.5 FPS at 1080p to 113.2 FPS at 4K, a 62.8% reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 151.7 FPS to 52.7 FPS, a 65.3% reduction. This consistent percentage decline across settings indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s performance remains constant regardless of pixel count.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K textures, but the sheer number of pixels overwhelms the GPU’s shading units. The 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is solid, yet it cannot maintain the same frame rates at 4K as it does at 1080p. The data suggests that for 4K gaming, users should expect to play at Medium or High settings to stay above 60 FPS, as Ultra dips to 52.7 FPS. At 1440p, the combo hits a sweet spot, offering 125.2 FPS at High and 97.3 FPS at Ultra, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The CPU, with its 96th percentile ranking, is never the limiting factor here; instead, the GPU’s pixel throughput capabilities define the performance ceiling at higher resolutions.