Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ranks 2887 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places the combination in the bottom 4% of all tested configurations, indicating that while the CPU is a strong performer, the overall gaming experience is heavily constrained by the GPU. The data shows a system that can handle the game’s simulation and networking demands but struggles to translate that into high frame rates due to graphics processing limits.

Benchmark results indicate that the combo’s ranking is a direct consequence of the GTX 1650’s position in the GPU hierarchy. The graphics card sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7472. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (0.3% faster), the Intel UHD Graphics 750 (0.4% faster), and the AMD Radeon R7 350 (0.6% faster), while the Intel Arc A310 is 1% behind. This grouping shows that the GTX 1650 is competing with entry-level and integrated graphics solutions, not with dedicated gaming cards. Consequently, the measured FPS figures across all resolutions and settings reflect a GPU-bound scenario where the Ultra 5 245’s processing power is largely underutilized.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2887 out of 3005 is a poor result, placing it in the bottom 4% of tested configurations for Fivem. This ranking is not a reflection of the CPU’s capabilities, as the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a high-end desktop processor. Instead, the data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The GTX 1650’s performance percentile of 40% among all GPUs means that the majority of graphics cards tested outperform it. In a game like Fivem, which relies heavily on GPU rendering for its open-world environments, this creates a significant ceiling for frame rates.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are impressive on their own. The Ultra 5 245 achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32924 and a single-core score of 4648, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 48995 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, -0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, -0.5%), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698, 0.6%), and the Intel Core i5-14600K (48618, 0.8%). These numbers indicate that the CPU is more than capable of handling Fivem’s multi-threaded workloads, including player position tracking, physics calculations, and server-side script execution. However, the GPU cannot keep up, resulting in the low combo ranking.

The measured FPS data reinforces this conclusion. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 76 FPS average, which is playable. But at Ultra settings, the average drops to 37 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 14 FPS. These numbers show a system that is only suitable for lower resolutions and settings in Fivem. The combo’s rank of 2887 is consistent with these findings, as most other tested combos likely include more capable graphics cards that can maintain higher frame rates at higher settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is the limiting factor in this combo. It features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 128.1 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1485 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 2001 MHz (8 Gbps effective). These specifications are modest by modern standards, and the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms its entry-level status.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role is critical because the game renders a detailed open-world environment with numerous vehicles, buildings, and dynamic lighting. The measured FPS data shows how the GTX 1650’s limitations manifest across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 14 (Ultra) to 28 (Low), with Medium settings producing 22 FPS (min 19, max 25). At 2560x1440, the averages improve to 25 FPS (Ultra), 32 FPS (High), 40 FPS (Medium, min 34, max 45), and 50 FPS (Low). At 1920x1080, the averages are 37 FPS (Ultra), 48 FPS (High), 60 FPS (Medium, min 51, max 69), and 76 FPS (Low).

These numbers indicate that the 4 GB VRAM is a significant constraint, especially at higher resolutions. Fivem’s textures and draw distances can exceed 4 GB at 1440p or 4K, leading to reduced performance. The GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 128.1 GB/s bandwidth also limit its ability to feed the rendering pipeline with data quickly. The GTX 1650’s FP32 performance of 2.984 TFLOPS and texture rate of 93.24 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p gaming at lower settings, but they are insufficient for higher resolutions or demanding presets.

The GPU’s nearest rivals further illustrate its position. The AMD Radeon HD 8850M (0.3% faster), Intel UHD Graphics 750 (0.4% faster), and AMD Radeon R7 350 (0.6% faster) are all older or integrated solutions. The Intel Arc A310 is 1% slower. This means the GTX 1650 is not just an entry-level card; it is competing with hardware that is often found in budget laptops or legacy systems. For Fivem, this translates to a need to prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, as the GPU cannot sustain high settings at playable speeds.

FAQ

Q: Why does this combo rank so low in Fivem despite having a powerful CPU?

A: The combo ranks 2887 out of 3005 tested, which is in the bottom 4%. The CPU (Intel Core Ultra 5 245) is at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, but the GPU (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650) is at the 40th percentile. Fivem’s rendering demands are primarily handled by the GPU, so the GTX 1650’s entry-level performance creates a bottleneck, capping frame rates and limiting settings.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo achieves consistently playable frame rates. At Low settings, the average is 76 FPS, and at Medium, it is 60 FPS. At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 25 (Ultra) to 50 (Low), while at 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to between 14 (Ultra) and 28 (Low). For a smoother experience, 1080p is recommended.

Q: Can this combo handle Fivem at Ultra settings?

A: No. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 37, which is below the typical 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average drops to 25 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Ultra, it falls to 14 FPS. These results indicate that Ultra settings are not viable for this GPU in Fivem.

Q: How does the GTX 1650 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GTX 1650’s average benchmark score is 7472. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447, 0.3% faster), Intel UHD Graphics 750 (7441, 0.4% faster), AMD Radeon R7 350 (7425, 0.6% faster), and Intel Arc A310 (7550, 1% slower). These comparisons show that the GTX 1650 is on par with older or integrated graphics solutions, not dedicated gaming GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, -0.4%), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, -0.5%), Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698, 0.6%), and Intel Core i5-14600K (48618, 0.8%). The CPU performs within 1% of these processors, indicating it is a strong multi-threaded performer.

Q: Does the GPU or CPU bottleneck Fivem performance?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck. Evidence includes the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 90th percentile, and the measured FPS scaling with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 76 FPS, but at 3840x2160 Ultra, it drops to 14 FPS. This resolution-dependent scaling is characteristic of a GPU-limited system, as the CPU’s performance remains constant while the GPU’s load increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how this combo performs in Fivem across three resolutions and four settings presets. The numbers reveal a clear pattern: higher resolutions and settings lead to significant frame rate drops, confirming the GPU-bound nature of this configuration.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 76, which is smooth for most gameplay scenarios. Medium settings produce an average of 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 and maximum of 69, indicating that this is the sweet spot for a balance between visual quality and fluidity. High settings drop the average to 48 FPS, which is still playable but may feel less responsive in fast-paced multiplayer moments. Ultra settings yield an average of 37 FPS, which is borderline for competitive play but acceptable for casual exploration.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance degrades noticeably. Low settings produce an average of 50 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. Medium settings drop to 40 FPS (min 34, max 45), High settings to 32 FPS, and Ultra to 25 FPS. These numbers suggest that 1440p is only viable at Low or Medium settings, and even then, the frame rates are not consistently high. The 4 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are likely struggling with the increased pixel count and texture memory requirements.

At 3840x2160, the combo is largely unplayable. Low settings produce an average of 28 FPS, Medium settings 22 FPS (min 19, max 25), High settings 18 FPS, and Ultra settings 14 FPS. These frame rates are below the threshold for smooth gameplay, making 4K resolution impractical for this hardware. The GPU’s 128.1 GB/s bandwidth and 2.984 TFLOPS FP32 performance are insufficient for the rendering load at 4K, even with reduced settings.

The data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (76 FPS) and Ultra (37 FPS) is 39 FPS. At 1440p, the difference is 25 FPS (50 vs. 25). At 4K, the difference is 14 FPS (28 vs. 14). This indicates that the GPU’s limitations become more pronounced at higher resolutions, where the rendering pipeline is more heavily taxed.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo in Fivem depend on the user’s priority: frame rate or visual fidelity. For a smooth and responsive experience, 1920x1080 with Low settings is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 76 FPS. This setup minimizes GPU load and ensures that the CPU’s strong performance can be fully utilized for game logic and networking.

For users who want better visuals without sacrificing too much performance, 1920x1080 with Medium settings is recommended. The average of 60 FPS (min 51, max 69) is acceptable for most players, and the visual improvement over Low settings is noticeable. This is the highest setting at which the combo maintains a 60 FPS average, making it the best balance for general use.

High settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 48 FPS, which may be playable for some, but the drop below 50 FPS can lead to stuttering in crowded areas. Ultra settings at 1080p (37 FPS) are not recommended, as the frame rate is too low for a game that involves fast-paced driving and shooting.

At 2560x1440, the data suggests that Low settings (50 FPS) are the only viable option for a reasonably smooth experience. Medium settings (40 FPS) may be acceptable for slower gameplay, but the minimum of 34 FPS indicates potential drops during intense scenes. High (32 FPS) and Ultra (25 FPS) settings are not recommended, as they fall below playable thresholds.

3840x2160 is not viable for this combo. Even Low settings produce only 28 FPS, which is below the minimum for comfortable play. Users with 4K monitors should either lower the resolution to 1080p or consider a more powerful GPU.

The data also shows that the Medium preset at 1080p has a minimum FPS of 51, which is higher than the average FPS of High settings at the same resolution (48 FPS). This suggests that Medium is more consistent than High, making it the safer choice for maintaining playable frame rates during complex scenes.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a high-end desktop processor that plays a supporting role in this combo, but its performance is not the limiting factor in Fivem. The CPU features 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it is built on a 3 nm process node from TSMC.

Benchmark results show that the Ultra 5 245 is a top-tier processor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32924 and single-core score of 4648 place it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. The Passmark multithread score of 38706 and single-thread score of 4394 further confirm its strong performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 48995 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, -0.5%) and the Intel Core i5-14600K (48618, 0.8%). This indicates that the Ultra 5 245 is on par with some of the best CPUs available.

In Fivem, the CPU handles tasks such as server-side script execution, player position updates, and physics calculations. The game is known for its CPU-intensive multiplayer mode, where dozens of players interact in a shared world. The Ultra 5 245’s 14 cores and 14 threads are well-suited for these workloads, and its high boost clock of 5.10 GHz ensures strong single-threaded performance, which is important for game logic.

However, the measured FPS data shows that the CPU’s capabilities are not fully utilized in this combo. The frame rates are consistently low across resolutions and settings, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. For example, at 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 76 FPS, but at 3840x2160 Ultra, it drops to 14 FPS. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would be more consistent across resolutions, as the CPU’s workload does not scale with resolution. Instead, the GPU’s rendering load increases with resolution, causing the frame rates to plummet.

The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking highlights the imbalance in this combo. In Fivem, the Ultra 5 245 can easily handle the game’s simulation and networking demands, but the GTX 1650 cannot keep up with the rendering demands. This results in a system that is CPU-overpowered and GPU-underpowered, leading to the low combo rank of 2887 out of 3005.

The CPU’s memory support for DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s also ensures that it can feed data to the GPU quickly, but the GPU’s 128-bit bus and 4 GB VRAM create a bottleneck in the graphics pipeline. For users with this combo, the CPU is not the issue; upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance improvement in Fivem. The data confirms that the Ultra 5 245 is a future-proof processor that can support more powerful GPUs, but it is wasted on the GTX 1650 in this game.