Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 121 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 57 | 71 | 90 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 102 | 128 | 162 |
| 1080p Full HD | 120 | 155 | 194 | 246 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis
# Fivem Performance Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 9070
The measured FPS data for Fivem with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 reveals a combination that scales predictably across resolutions, with the GPU becoming the dominant constraint at 4K while the CPU's strong single-thread performance keeps frame rates high at 1080p. This pairing sits at rank 847 out of 3005 tested combos in this game, placing it comfortably in the upper third of all configurations evaluated. The data shows a system capable of smooth multiplayer sessions at most settings, though the Ultra preset demands significant compromises at higher resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and consistent across all settings, indicating a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 246 FPS at 1920x1080 to 90 FPS at 3840x2160 — a reduction of 63.4%. This steep decline suggests that the Radeon RX 9070's rendering throughput becomes the limiting factor as pixel count quadruples. The Medium preset shows a similar pattern: 194 FPS at 1080p drops to 71 FPS at 4K, a 63.4% decrease that mirrors the Low setting's scaling almost exactly.
High settings reveal the same trend with 155 FPS at 1080p falling to 57 FPS at 4K, a 63.2% reduction. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, sees 120 FPS at 1080p plummet to 44 FPS at 4K — a 63.3% drop. This remarkable consistency across all four presets — each showing roughly a 63% performance loss when moving from 1080p to 4K — points to a purely resolution-driven bottleneck rather than a settings-dependent one. The GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being saturated at 4K regardless of the visual complexity.
Between 1440p and 4K, the scaling continues to show the GPU's strain. At Medium settings, 128 FPS at 2560x1440 drops to 71 FPS at 3840x2160, a 44.5% reduction. The transition from 1080p to 1440p is less punishing: Medium settings go from 194 FPS to 128 FPS, a 34% drop. This non-linear scaling — with the 1440p-to-4K jump being more costly than the 1080p-to-1440p jump — aligns with the pixel count increase being proportionally larger between 1440p and 4K (2.25x) compared to 1080p to 1440p (1.78x). The data suggests that users targeting 4K should expect roughly half the frame rate of 1080p, regardless of preset.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 847 out of 3005 tested configurations places this pairing in the 71.8th percentile among all CPU-GPU combinations evaluated in Fivem. This is a strong showing, though not elite — the top quartile of combos achieves higher frame rates, likely through more powerful GPUs or CPUs with higher boost clocks. The rank reflects that while this system handles Fivem well at 1080p and 1440p, it falls short of the highest-performing rigs at 4K, where the 57 FPS High average is only marginally above playable thresholds.
Breaking down the rank by resolution, the system's relative position improves at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the 155 FPS High average and 246 FPS Low average would place this combo within the top tier of performers, as these numbers exceed what many competing systems achieve. However, at 4K, the 44 FPS Ultra average drags the overall rank down, as many combos with higher-end GPUs maintain 60+ FPS at this resolution. The rank of 847 is thus a composite that balances the combo's excellent 1080p performance against its merely adequate 4K showing.
Compared to the nearest CPU rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235's average benchmark score of 46062 sits within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030), Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098), AMD EPYC 4364P (45970), and AMD EPYC 7303 (45960). This tight clustering means the CPU choice among these four would produce nearly identical frame rates in Fivem, assuming the same GPU. The 0.1-0.2% deltas are within measurement noise, so the ranking in Fivem is driven almost entirely by the GPU and its interaction with the game engine.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for Fivem's asset streaming in multiplayer environments. The 4K Medium preset's 60 FPS minimum frame rate suggests that memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck, as even the most demanding scenes maintain playable lows. The GPU's boost clock of 2520 MHz and game clock of 2070 MHz are moderate by current standards, yet the measured results show the card delivering 246 FPS at 1080p Low — a figure that indicates strong raw throughput for this game's engine.
The GPU's benchmark scores contextualize its Fivem performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and PassMark G3D score of 25381 place it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. In Fivem, however, the card's performance relative to its rivals is tighter: the nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, has an average score of 23736 (0.6% lower), while the AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063 (0.8% higher). The RTX 3080 Mobile and RTX 2080 SUPER are 1.1% and 1.2% away, respectively. This suggests that in Fivem, the RX 9070's performance is comparable to these older or lower-tier cards, despite its modern RDNA 4.0 architecture.
The 4K Ultra preset's 44 FPS average indicates the GPU's limits are reached when maximum visual fidelity is enabled at high pixel counts. The 56 ray tracing cores and 128 ROPs contribute to the card's capability, but Fivem's multiplayer nature means CPU-side simulation of other players often limits frame rates in crowded areas. The data shows that at 1080p, the GPU is rarely the bottleneck — the 246 FPS Low average far exceeds what most monitors display, and the 194 FPS Medium average confirms headroom remains.
FAQ
Q: Does this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K?
A: Only at Low settings, where the average is 90 FPS. The Medium preset averages 71 FPS with a 60 FPS minimum, making it the only other 4K setting that stays above 60 FPS on average. High settings drop to 57 FPS, and Ultra falls to 44 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?
A: 1440p offers the best balance, with High settings averaging 102 FPS and Medium reaching 128 FPS. The 1080p results are higher (155 FPS High, 194 FPS Medium) but exceed most monitors' refresh rates, making 1440p the practical sweet spot.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235's average benchmark score of 46062 is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030), Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098), and AMD EPYC 4364P (45970), indicating near-identical CPU-bound performance in Fivem.
Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at any resolution?
A: At 1080p, Ultra averages 120 FPS, which is playable. At 1440p, it drops to 79 FPS, still acceptable. At 4K, the 44 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS threshold typically desired for smooth multiplayer gameplay.
Q: Why does the frame rate drop so consistently between 1080p and 4K?
A: All four presets show a 63% reduction in FPS from 1080p to 4K, indicating the GPU's rendering pipeline is saturated at higher resolutions. The 16 GB memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient; the limitation is in the GPU's compute throughput.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate at Medium settings?
A: The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum FPS values: 165 FPS at 1080p, 108 FPS at 1440p, and 60 FPS at 4K. These minimums indicate the combo avoids severe frame drops even in demanding scenes.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured results show a wide spread across presets. Low settings deliver 246 FPS average, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Medium settings average 194 FPS with a minimum of 165 FPS and maximum of 223 FPS, demonstrating consistent performance. High settings reduce the average to 155 FPS, while Ultra drops further to 120 FPS. The 1080p data indicates the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset stays well above 100 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the GPU's increasing workload. Low settings average 162 FPS, a 34.1% reduction from 1080p. Medium settings average 128 FPS with a minimum of 108 FPS and maximum of 147 FPS — the minimum staying above 100 FPS is notable for multiplayer stability. High settings average 102 FPS, and Ultra drops to 79 FPS. The 1440p results suggest this resolution is the practical maximum for maintaining high refresh rates, as even Ultra stays above 75 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low settings average 90 FPS, which is the only 4K preset above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS — the minimum exactly hits the 60 FPS threshold, indicating occasional drops to this level. High settings average 57 FPS, below the 60 FPS target, and Ultra averages 44 FPS, which is noticeably less smooth. The 4K data shows that users must choose between Low settings for fluid gameplay or Medium for better visuals with acceptable performance.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235's 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, provide strong single-threaded performance that Fivem's multiplayer engine benefits from. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085 and multi-core score of 14769 indicate the CPU handles both the game's simulation threads and background tasks without becoming a bottleneck. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support fast asset streaming in populated servers.
The CPU's PassMark scores further contextualize its Fivem performance. The single-thread score of 4516 is particularly relevant, as Fivem's frame pacing in multiplayer often depends on the main game thread. The multi-thread score of 37816 shows ample headroom for other applications running concurrently. The data compression score of 390711 and encryption score of 29293 suggest the CPU can handle network-related tasks efficiently, which matters in a multiplayer context where data packets are constantly processed.
The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 46062, places it just above the midpoint of its nearest rivals. The 0.1% delta against the Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098) and 0.2% against the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030) indicates that within this performance class, the specific CPU choice has minimal impact on Fivem's frame rates. The data shows that at 1080p Low, where the GPU is least stressed, the CPU still delivers 246 FPS — suggesting it is not the limiting component even in CPU-light scenarios.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured data, the Medium preset offers the best overall experience for this combo. At 1440p, Medium averages 128 FPS with a 108 FPS minimum, providing smooth gameplay with visual enhancements over Low. The 1080p Medium result of 194 FPS exceeds most monitors' capabilities, meaning users with 144Hz displays would be effectively capped. The 4K Medium average of 71 FPS with a 60 FPS minimum is the only 4K setting that maintains playable performance while offering reasonable visual quality.
For users prioritizing maximum frame rates, Low settings at 1440p (162 FPS) or 1080p (246 FPS) are the clear choice. The Low preset's performance headroom makes it suitable for competitive play where frame rate consistency matters more than visual fidelity. However, the jump from Low to Medium at 1440p costs only 34 FPS (from 162 to 128), while providing noticeable visual improvements — a trade-off worth considering.
High settings present a middle ground, with 102 FPS at 1440p and 57 FPS at 4K. The 1440p High result is excellent for immersive single-player moments, but the 4K High average falling below 60 FPS makes it less ideal for multiplayer where smoothness is critical. Ultra settings are only recommended at 1080p, where the 120 FPS average remains fluid, or at 1440p if the user accepts 79 FPS. The 44 FPS 4K Ultra result is the least desirable configuration in the dataset, recommending against this preset for 4K users.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 235
AMD Radeon RX 9070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 90.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 71.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 57.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 162.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 128.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 102.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 79.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 246.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 194.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 120.0 |
Fivem with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 9070 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RX 9070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.