Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (10 cores, 10 threads) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (12 GB GDDR6) combination has been measured in Fivem, a multiplayer title released in 2017. The dataset spans 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 at Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets. This pairing ranks 1681 out of 3707 tested combos. The following sections break down the results, the roles of each component, and the practical implications for playing Fivem.

How It Ranks

The combination places 1681st out of 3707 tested combos, meaning roughly 45% of tested pairings outperform it. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile across all tested CPUs, while the GPU stands at the 71st percentile. The wide gap between those percentiles suggests the graphics card is the more likely bottleneck for and this multi.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 36938, and its nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (avg score 36945, delta 0%), the Ryzen 5 5500X3D (avg 37018, -0.2%), the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (avg 37093, -0.4), and the Core i9-12900T (avg 37112, -0.5%). All four rivals sit within a 0.5% performance envelope, so the Ultra 5 225 is effectively matched against those parts in aggregate CPU benchmarks.

On the GPU side, the RX 6750 XT's average score is 26011, with a percentile of 71. Its nearest listed rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (score 25891, +0.5%), the AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, +0.6%), the FirePro D700 (25842, +0.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25740, +1.1%). The GPU leads these by small margins, but the closest rival (R9 M395X) is slower by only 0.5%, and the largest delta is 1.1% – this shows the RX 6750 XT sits very close to those parts in synthetic scores.

In the game itself, the combo completes in that full dataset of measured FPS, with all rows at 4K having no recorded min/max except Medium. The performance profile across presets at each resolution is consistent – Low always delivers the highest frame rate, and Ultra the lowest, as expected.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, which provides a 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its base clock is 2150 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz; memory runs at 2250 MHz (or 18 Gbps effective). The GPU has a 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute rating. Those figures are in the measured dataset.

Within this Fivem sample, the GPU's 12 GB capacity is not a constraint – the highest VRAM usage never appears in the data. The 72 GB/s bandwidth allows the 4K Medium preset to hold 58 FPS, while 4K High falls to 46 FPS, and Ultra drops to 36. The difference between Low and Medium at each resolution is consistent: for example, at 1440p Low delivers 132 FPS, and Medium 104. The RX 6750 XT is the Part that shifts the frame rate between 1080p and 4K.

The GPU has a 71st percentile ranking among all GPUs. In the game, that translates to a decent but not class leading result. Its nearest listed rivals are the R9 M395X and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile; the measured delta percentages from the actual average GPU scores are +0.5% and +1.1% respectively. These deltas are minimal, so the RX 6750 XT is effectively tied with those parts in this game.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 26011 is only slightly above the R9 M395X's 25891, which is a older mobile part. That low margin explains why the GPU is not scored higher in the percentile table.

Settings Recommendations

For 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 200 FPS, but the Medium preset also stays well above 60 FPS with an average of 158 FPS (min 134, max 182). High sits at 126 FPS, and Ultra at 98. Medium at 1080p provides a stable, high-refresh experience while still offering much better visuals than Low. Ultra is to be usable at 98 FPS, but without min/max data we cannot confirm stability; Medium has a recorded min of 134 FPS, so it is the most conservative full-fidelity option.

At 2560x1440, Low hits 132 FPS, Medium 104 (min 88, max 120), High 83, and Ultra 65. For a 60 Hz display, Ultra (65 FPS) is viable, but Medium gives a headroom of about 44% over that. Given the Medium preset also records explicit 0-120 fps bounds, it again emerges as the most data-backed balanced setting.

At 3840x2160, Low achieves 73 FPS, Medium 58 (min 49, max 66), High 46, and Ultra 36. Medium is the only row with min/max figures. With 58 FPS average and a 49 FPS minimum, it barely reaches 60 Hz, but it ably protects against drops. When the target is a locked 60, the Low preset's 73 FPS is a stronger option; it lacks min/max numbers, yet the nominal average suggests it holds comfortable.

Thus, the Medium preset is the most well-determined balanced choice across all three resolutions. At 1080p and 1440p it already delivers above 100 FPS, while at 4K it maintains ≈58 FPS with measurable minimums.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest FPS measured in this dataset?

A: The 1920x1080 Low preset yields the maximum average frame rate at 200 FPS. No other resolution or settings combination exceeds that.

Q: Does the RX 6750 XT's memory capacity cause any limitation?

A: The data lists 12 GB GDDR6 memory and the game does not appear to exceed that. The performance differences across settings are more consistent with typical GPU load scaling.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-thread performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891. In the nearest-rival table, the Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36945, the Ryzen 5 5500X3D 37018, the AI 7 PRO 450 37093, and the Core i9-12900T 37112; the deltaPct values are -0.2% to -0.5% relative to the Ultra 5's value.

Q: What is the only setting with min/max frame data?

A: The Medium preset is the sole settings level that reports minimum and maximum FPS for each resolution. For example, 1920x1080 Medium min is 134 and max is 182; 2560x1440 min 88 max 120; 3840x2160 min 49 max 66.

Q: Which resolution offers the best FPS per the core takes?

A: At Ultra, 3840x2160 yields 36 FPS, 2560x1440 65 FPS, and 1920x1080 98 FPS. So scaling down from 4K to 1080p nearly triples the frame rate in the Ultra preset.

Q: What is the exact will of the CPU's boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz and 10 threads.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS values decrease sharply as resolution moves from 1080p to 4K for every setting. For the High preset, FPS goes from 126 at 1920x1080, to 83 at 2560x1440, and to 46 at 3840x2160 – a drop of 80 FPS when moving from Full HD to 4K. In percentage terms, that strictly (126 – 46) = 80 FPS lower. The Low preset shows a similar trend: 200 → 132 → 73. Medium: 158 → 104 → 58. Ultra: 98 → 65 → 36.

This consistent decline (roughly 2× to 2.2× between consecutive resolutions) is characteristic of a GPU-limited workload. Since the CPU is 85th percentile (high) and the GPU is 71st, the low FPS at 4K is likely driven by the rendering load of the RX 6750 XT, not by CPU. The fact that the FPS drops steadily with resolution across all settings indicates the GPU is the major bound at high resolutions.

At 1080p, the CPU likely provides headroom – the 200 FPS Low result points to the game becoming CPU-bound in the simplest scene, though further investigation is beyond this dataset. In all measured points, the order is: Low > Medium > High > Ultra at a given resolution.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on Arrow Lake-S architecture, with a base clock of 4.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It has a TDP of 65 W and integrator 3 MB L2 per core, 20 MB shared L3. Its launch MSRP is $246. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 25891 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3655 in single-core. The percentile vs all CPUs is 2.

In the game data, the CPU allows the GPU to work to reach the numbers listed. At 1080p, the 158 FPS Medium result is far above what a typical 71st-percentile GPU would deliver, implying that the CPU is not restricting the frame rate there. The CPU's aggregate score is 36938, and its nearest rivals (e.g., Ryzen 5 5600F) have an average score of 36945 with only a 0% delta. Therefore, the Ultra 5 225 delivers CPU performance essentially equivalent to those parts, and the raw FPS are then governed by the GPU.

The L3 cache of 20 MB, a 192 KB per-core L1, and 2 MB per‑core L2 are contributing factors to Fivem's discrete hardware. While Fivem is multiplayer and often involves thousands of entities, the CPU's multi-thread score (25891 R23 multi) can handle the majority of the server-side AI and physics. However, the 4K Ultra settings still drop to 36 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the major constraint at higher loads.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | Low | 73 | – | – |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 58 | 49 | 66 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 46 | – | – |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 36 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 132 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 104 | 88 | 120 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 83 | – | – |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 65 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 200 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 158 | 134 | 182 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 126 | – | – |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 98 | – | – |

The 4K Medium row is the only one among the high‑resolution entries that includes frame time limits (49–66). At 1440p, Medium min/max covers 88–120. At 1080p, Medium min/max 134–182. All other presets lack these bounds, but the dataset still gives a clear picture: each step of resolution adds a consistent 30% packed within the same preset. The combination at 1080p becomes viable for 144 Hz only on Low (200 FPS) and Medium (158 FPS); High (126) and Ultra (98) remain above 90 Hz.

The overall dataset shows a GPU‑limited system at higher resolutions, with a CPU that offers enough headroom to prevent bottlenecks at 1080p and 1440p. The RX 6750 XT's 12 GB VRAM does not show any signs of overflow in these numbers, but the measured FPS at 4K are clearly limited to about 46 FPS High or 58 FPS Medium.