Fivem

This benchmark analysis examines the performance of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Fivem. The data indicates a significant bottleneck landscape, where the mobile processor consistently limits the desktop-class GPU, particularly at lower resolutions. This report will dissect the measured frame rates, contextualize the combo’s ranking, and provide actionable settings recommendations based solely on the provided metrics.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a classic pattern of CPU limitation at lower resolutions, transitioning to a more balanced load at 4K. Examining the High preset, we see a progression from 173 FPS at 1920x1080, to 114 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally 63 FPS at 3840x2160. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is a substantial 59 FPS (approximately 34%), while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 51 FPS (approximately 45%). This scaling is not linear, indicating that the workload shifts from being heavily CPU-bound to becoming more GPU-dependent as resolution increases.

The Low preset shows an even more pronounced CPU bottleneck at 1080p, with an average of 274 FPS. This high frame rate at the lowest settings suggests the CPU is near its maximum throughput, as the GPU is not being taxed. Scaling to 1440p Low yields 180 FPS, a drop of 94 FPS, and then to 4K Low, the system still manages 100 FPS. The fact that the RTX 5090 can produce such high frame rates at 1080p Low, but the system cannot exceed 274 FPS, strongly suggests that the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is the limiting factor in this configuration for those scenarios.

At 4K, the scaling becomes more indicative of GPU load. The difference between Low (100 FPS) and Ultra (49 FPS) at this resolution is 51 FPS, showing that the GPU is now the primary driver of performance. The gap between High (63 FPS) and Ultra (49 FPS) is 14 FPS, which is a smaller relative jump than the 21 FPS difference between Low and Medium (79 FPS). This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are particularly demanding on the GPU’s resources, such as high-resolution textures or advanced shading, which the 32 GB VRAM and high memory bandwidth must handle.

The data shows that the best way to increase frame rates is to lower the resolution. However, the performance headroom at 1080p is capped by the CPU. This means that users with high-refresh-rate monitors will likely find that the CPU prevents them from fully utilizing the RTX 5090’s capabilities in this title, while those targeting 4K will see a more balanced system where both components are actively engaged.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combos, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 601st out of 3005 combinations for Fivem. This places it in the top 20% of all tested configurations, a strong showing that is primarily driven by the GPU’s immense power. However, the ranking also reveals the CPU’s drag on the overall potential.

The combo’s rank is a direct result of the interaction between the two components. The RTX 5090, with a percentile ranking of 92 among all GPUs, is clearly a top-tier performer. In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has a percentile ranking of 81 among all CPUs. While both are above average, the CPU is the weaker link. When paired, the system’s performance in Fivem is not simply the average of the two; it is limited by the slower component, which in many scenarios is the processor.

This is evident when looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H’s average benchmark score is 29093, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (29123, a delta of -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (28940, a delta of 0.5%). These are all capable desktop processors, but they lack the raw multi-threaded power of modern high-end desktop chips. In a game like Fivem, which is known to be sensitive to single-thread performance, the processor’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1700 may be a limiting factor for achieving the highest possible frame rates.

The GPU’s nearest rivals, on the other hand, are professional or workstation-class cards like the NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants. The RTX 5090’s average benchmark score of 79842 is 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT and 1.4% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X. This indicates that in synthetic benchmarks, the GPU is performing as expected. In the game, however, the 601st rank out of 3005 combos shows that the CPU prevents this GPU from reaching the top echelons of performance where it would likely sit if paired with a more powerful processor.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications are proof of its high-end positioning. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and features a massive 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a staggering 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth. This is crucial for high-resolution gaming, as it prevents texture streaming and data transfer from becoming a bottleneck. The GPU also boasts 21,760 shading units and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, enabling a peak FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes more significant as resolution and settings increase. At 4K Ultra, the game is clearly GPU-bound, with an average of 49 FPS. This is a demanding setting that leverages the GPU’s full capabilities. The 32 GB of VRAM is a key asset here, as Fivem, a multiplayer modification for a large open-world game, can have substantial texture and asset requirements, especially with custom content. The data shows the RTX 5090 handles this load, but the frame rate indicates that even this powerful card is challenged by the Ultra preset at 4K.

The GPU’s performance scaling is also noteworthy. At 1440p, the frame rates are high, ranging from 88 FPS on Ultra to 180 FPS on Low. This demonstrates that at this resolution, the GPU has ample headroom and is not the primary constraint. However, the jump from Medium (142 FPS) to High (114 FPS) is a 28 FPS drop, which is significant. This suggests that the High preset introduces effects that are more taxing than Medium, but the GPU still manages to maintain a playable frame rate.

The RTX 5090’s benchmark results, such as a Passmark G3D score of 39650 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18355, confirm its position as a top-tier graphics card. In the context of this CPU-GPU pairing, the data suggests that the GPU is often underutilized. At 1080p Low, the system averages 274 FPS, which is likely near the CPU’s frame generation limit. Upgrading the GPU further would yield no benefit in this scenario, as the processor is the bottleneck. The GPU’s role is to provide the visual fidelity at higher resolutions and settings, where it is the deciding factor in performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate measured for this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 274 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with the Ultra preset?

A: At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the combo produces an average frame rate of 49 FPS. This is the lowest performance point in the measured data.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU is the limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, the system reaches 274 FPS, but this frame rate is likely constrained by the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H’s processing power rather than the RTX 5090’s capabilities, as the GPU is not under heavy load at this resolution and settings combination.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between 1440p High and 1080p High?

A: The average frame rate at 2560x1440 with High settings is 114 FPS, while at 1920x1080 with High settings, it is 173 FPS. This represents a 59 FPS difference between the two resolutions.

Q: Does the RTX 5090 have enough VRAM for Fivem?

A: Yes, the GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory. The measured data shows no indication of VRAM limitations, as the GPU is able to produce playable frame rates at 4K on High settings (63 FPS), where memory capacity is most likely to be stressed.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 601st out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the upper 20% of all configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average frame rates measured for this combo. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not provided for all presets, but where available, they are included for context.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 63 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 100 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 79 | 67 | 91 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 114 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 180 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 142 | 121 | 163 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 88 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 173 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 274 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 216 | 184 | 248 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 134 | - | - |

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a mobile processor, part of the Core Ultra Series 1, built on the Meteor Lake architecture. It has 14 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its cache configuration includes 112 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 18 MB L3 cache. The processor’s TDP is 28 W, which is typical for a mobile chip. Its performance, as indicated by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11875.5 and a single-core score of 1700, is solid for a mobile part but falls short of high-end desktop processors.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is most evident at lower resolutions and settings. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system can only achieve 274 FPS. This is a high frame rate, but likely not the maximum the RTX 5090 could produce if paired with a stronger CPU. The processor’s single-thread performance is critical for such a scenario, as the game’s main simulation and network threads often rely on a single core. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1700 and Passmark single-thread score of 3521 provide a reference point for its capability.

The CPU’s benchmark scores place it near the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X in terms of average score (29093 vs 29123, a delta of -0.1%). This suggests that in a best-case scenario, the CPU can provide a gaming experience similar to that of a mid-range desktop processor from a previous generation. However, the mobile form factor and lower TDP mean it may not sustain high clocks for extended periods, potentially impacting performance in long gaming sessions. The data shows that while the CPU is not weak, it is the component that prevents this combo from achieving the highest possible frame rates in Fivem, especially for users with high-refresh-rate 1080p or 1440p monitors.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display resolution and refresh rate priorities. The data shows a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and performance.

For users with a 4K display, the High preset provides the best balance, yielding an average of 63 FPS. This is a playable frame rate for most gamers and significantly better than the Ultra preset’s 49 FPS. The Medium preset, at 79 FPS, is also an excellent choice for those preferring smoother gameplay, as it offers a 16 FPS improvement over High while likely still looking good. The Low preset, at 100 FPS, is the most competitive option, sacrificing visual quality for a much higher frame rate.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 114 FPS, which is a very good experience. However, for users with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the Medium preset at 142 FPS is a superior choice, as it gets the frame rate into the high-refresh territory. The Low preset at 180 FPS is the best for competitive play, ensuring the frame rate stays well above 144 FPS. The Ultra preset, at 88 FPS, is also viable, but the 26 FPS drop from High may not justify the visual improvements for all users.

For 1080p, the CPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The High preset averages 173 FPS, which is excellent for most monitors. The Medium preset at 216 FPS is better for those with 240Hz displays, and the Low preset at 274 FPS is the absolute maximum, ideal for the highest refresh rate panels. The Ultra preset, at 134 FPS, is still smooth but represents a significant drop from High, suggesting that the extra visual effects are not worth the performance cost at this resolution. The data indicates that High or Medium presets are the optimal choices at 1080p, as they offer a good balance without pushing the CPU to its absolute limit.