Fivem

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a high-end combination that delivers exceptional performance in Fivem, but the data shows that the game's multiplayer environments create a unique bottleneck profile. The benchmark results indicate that this combo ranks in the top 11% of all tested configurations, placing 197th out of 1792 combos. This is a strong position, but the measured FPS data reveals that the choice of settings has a more dramatic impact on performance than resolution, which is a key insight for users. The data suggests that the CPU's massive 24-core, 32-thread configuration is well-suited for handling the complex simulation of a multiplayer server, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and high memory bandwidth are more than sufficient for the game's visual demands.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data clearly indicates that the "High" preset offers the most balanced and recommended experience for this hardware combination in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 193.9 FPS, which is more than enough for a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience. Moving up to 2560x1440, High still maintains a robust 124.9 FPS average, making it the sweet spot for users with 1440p monitors. Even at the demanding 3840x2160 resolution, High achieves a playable 68 FPS average, which is a solid foundation for a smooth experience.

The "Ultra" preset, while visually superior, presents a significant performance cost that is not justified by the data. At 4K, Ultra drops the average FPS to 55.7, which is below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider essential for a first-person experience. At 1440p, Ultra yields 99.7 FPS, and at 1080p, it produces 151.6 FPS. While these are all playable, the performance delta between High and Ultra is substantial. The data shows that choosing High over Ultra provides a performance uplift of roughly 18-22% across all resolutions, which is a significant gain for what is likely a modest visual improvement in a game like Fivem.

The "Medium" and "Low" presets are less optimal for this hardware. Medium delivers 240.2 FPS at 1080p and 160.3 FPS at 1440p, but the visual compromise is unnecessary given the headroom offered by the High preset. Low is only useful for competitive play at the highest possible framerates, hitting 304.6 FPS at 1080p, but it sacrifices too much visual fidelity for a system of this caliber. The data recommends High as the default setting, with users able to comfortably experiment with Ultra at 1080p if they prioritize visuals over the extra framerate headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 197 out of 1792 tested configurations places it in the top 11% of all systems tested for Fivem. This is a strong showing, but the data suggests that the ranking is heavily influenced by the CPU's capabilities. The Intel Core i9-14900K has a percentile rank of 97 against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 97% of all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 79824 places it in close competition with its nearest rivals, including the AMD EPYC 7413 (scoring 80041, a -0.3% delta) and the Intel Core i9-14900KF (scoring 79245, a 0.7% delta).

This high CPU percentile is critical for Fivem, which is known for being a CPU-intensive title, particularly in multiplayer scenarios with many players and entities. The GPU, while also powerful, has a lower percentile rank of 86 against all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 48704 is competitive with rivals like the NVIDIA CMP 50HX (scoring 49071, a -0.7% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (scoring 47915, a 1.6% delta). The combination of a top-tier CPU and a high-end GPU results in a system that is well-balanced for this specific game, but the ranking suggests that the CPU is the primary driver of its high position. The data implies that a system with a slightly weaker GPU but a similarly strong CPU might achieve a comparable rank, highlighting the CPU's dominance in Fivem's performance equation.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER plays a crucial, yet secondary, role in this configuration's Fivem performance. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is more than ample for Fivem at any resolution, as the game's texture and geometry demands are not extreme. The data shows that the GPU is not the limiting factor, as even at 4K with High settings, the system maintains a playable 68 FPS, indicating that the GPU has sufficient headroom.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 2340 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz, contribute to its solid compute performance of 44.10 TFLOPS. This raw power is more than enough to handle the game's rendering. However, the benchmark results across different resolutions reveal the GPU's role in scaling. When comparing the performance drop from 1080p to 4K, the FPS decline is substantial but consistent with a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. For instance, at High settings, performance drops from 193.9 FPS at 1080p to 124.9 FPS at 1440p and finally to 68 FPS at 4K. This shows that while the GPU is capable at 4K, it is the component that bears the brunt of the increased resolution load, whereas the CPU's load remains relatively constant. The GPU's 86th percentile rank, while lower than the CPU's 97th, confirms that it is a high-performing part, but the data points to the CPU as the component that sets this combo apart in Fivem.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Fivem with this hardware?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 with High settings is the most balanced experience, delivering a 124.9 FPS average. This provides a sharp image while maintaining framerates well above the 60 FPS target. 1920x1080 is ideal for maximum performance, hitting 193.9 FPS on High, while 3840x2160 is playable but demanding, with High yielding 68 FPS.

Q: Is the Ultra preset worth the performance cost?

A: The benchmark results indicate that the Ultra preset offers diminishing returns. At 1440p, Ultra delivers 99.7 FPS compared to High's 124.9 FPS, a performance drop of roughly 20%. At 4K, Ultra drops to 55.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The data suggests that High is the recommended setting for a smoother experience.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 197th out of 1792 tested configurations, placing it in the top 11%. This is a strong rank driven largely by the CPU's high performance, as the i9-14900K is in the 97th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Fivem performance?

A: The data strongly indicates the CPU is the primary driver. The i9-14900K's high single-thread and multi-thread scores, combined with the game's nature as a multiplayer sim, point to the CPU as the limiting factor at lower resolutions. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck, as evidenced by the larger FPS drops.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K with High settings, the system achieves a 68 FPS average, which is playable. However, users seeking higher framerates should stick to 1440p. Using the Ultra preset at 4K drops performance to 55.7 FPS, which may not be ideal for all players.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The data shows a massive difference. At 1920x1080, Low settings produce an average of 304.6 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 151.6 FPS. This is a performance gap of over 100%, indicating that the Ultra preset significantly increases the rendering load.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and expected pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, but the degree of the drop reveals important insights about the system's bottleneck. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 35-36%. For example, at High settings, performance falls from 193.9 FPS to 124.9 FPS. This is a significant drop, but it is less severe than the drop from 1440p to 4K.

The transition from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 results in a much larger performance hit, with average FPS dropping by roughly 45-46%. At High settings, performance goes from 124.9 FPS to 68 FPS. This non-linear scaling strongly suggests that the system is becoming increasingly GPU-bound at 4K. The GPU, with its 16 GB of VRAM and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth, is being tasked with rendering more than double the pixels of 1440p, and this load is causing a more dramatic FPS decline.

The data indicates that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, given its role in game logic and physics simulation. The framerates at these resolutions are high enough that the CPU's processing speed is likely the ceiling. However, at 4K, the GPU's rendering workload becomes the dominant constraint, as evidenced by the larger percentage drop in FPS. This analysis is consistent with the hardware's characteristics: a top-tier 14th-gen CPU with 24 cores and a high-end GPU that, while powerful, is not the absolute fastest on the market. The resolution scaling pattern is a textbook example of a balanced system that transitions from a CPU-bound state at lower resolutions to a GPU-bound state at 4K.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i9-14900K is the undisputed star of this configuration for Fivem, and the data supports this conclusion. The CPU features 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that excels in multi-threaded workloads. Its benchmark scores are exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49872 and a single-core score of 7040. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20370 and single-core score of 3064 further reinforce its dominance. The CPU's high clock speeds, with a base of 3.20 GHz and a boost of 6.00 GHz, are crucial for maintaining high single-thread performance.

Fivem, as a multiplayer mod for Grand Theft Auto V, requires significant CPU resources to manage the game world, player interactions, and server-side scripts. The i9-14900K's high multi-core performance is directly beneficial here, as it can handle the parallel tasks of rendering and simulation. The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache also helps in reducing latency and improving data access speeds, which is beneficial for the complex game logic. The 97th percentile ranking against all CPUs confirms that this is a top-tier processor, and its nearest rivals, like the AMD EPYC 7413 and Intel Core i9-14900KF, are within a 0.7% performance delta, highlighting the i9's position at the top of the consumer stack.

The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is likely the primary bottleneck, as the framerates are so high that the GPU is not fully saturated. The performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p (304.6 FPS vs 151.6 FPS) is a mix of both CPU and GPU load, but the CPU's ability to feed the GPU is a key factor. The CPU's performance is a major reason why this combo ranks in the top 11%, as a weaker CPU would likely cause a significant drop in average FPS, especially in busy multiplayer servers.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across all settings and resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest framerates. With Low settings, the average FPS is a staggering 304.6, indicating a massively CPU-bound scenario where the GPU is far from being the limiting factor. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 240.2 FPS, still an excellent result. The High preset, which is the recommended balance, yields 193.9 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still produces a very playable 151.6 FPS average. The data shows a clear hierarchy, with each step up in settings costing a significant number of frames.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings produce an average of 202.5 FPS, which is still exceptionally high. Medium settings deliver 160.3 FPS, and High settings achieve 124.9 FPS, which is ideal for a 1440p high-refresh-rate monitor. The Ultra preset drops below the 100 FPS mark, averaging 99.7 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering a great balance between visual quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, the system starts to feel the strain of the higher pixel count. Low settings maintain a solid 111.8 FPS average, showing that the GPU is still capable. Medium settings produce 86.8 FPS, and High settings yield 68 FPS, which is the minimum recommended for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS target, averaging 55.7 FPS. This breakdown confirms that while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is powerful, 4K gaming with maximum settings is beyond its comfortable reach in Fivem. The data across all resolutions highlights the system's ability to provide a high-performance experience, with the user's choice of resolution and settings dictating the final framerate.