Fivem

Fivem is a multiplayer-focused title where performance depends heavily on both the CPU and GPU, and the measured results for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT show a system that scales predictably with resolution. The data reveals a configuration that is strong at 1080p, capable at 1440p, and best kept at Medium settings for a smooth 4K experience.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is significant, and the pattern across settings indicates a clear shift in the bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces 200 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 132 FPS, a 34% reduction, and 4K Low lands at 73 FPS, a 63.5% drop from 1080p. This steep decline at lower settings points to the GPU becoming the limiting factor as pixel count rises.

However, the scaling pattern at higher settings tells a slightly different story. At Ultra settings, the system achieves 98 FPS at 1080p, 65 FPS at 1440p, and 36 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 33.7%, and from 1440p to 4K it is 44.6%. This suggests that even at Ultra, the GPU is still the primary constraint, but the CPU's role becomes more apparent at 1080p where the frame rates are high enough to expose its limits.

The data shows that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combination. At High settings, 1440p delivers 83 FPS, which is only a 34.1% drop from the 126 FPS at 1080p High. The system is not fully GPU-bound until you push past 1440p, as the 4K numbers show a more dramatic falloff. The Medium preset at 4K yields 58 FPS with a minimum of 49 and maximum of 66, indicating that the hardware can handle the resolution but requires a settings compromise to stay fluid.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 22 chip and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. Its memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s, which is a key factor in how it handles texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions. The GPU's boost clock is 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz, and it features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs.

In Fivem, the GPU's role is most evident when comparing Low to Ultra settings at the same resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (200 FPS) and Ultra (98 FPS) is 102 FPS, a 51% performance hit. This gap widens at 4K, where Low produces 73 FPS and Ultra drops to 36 FPS, a 50.7% reduction. The GPU is clearly the dominant factor in these swings, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed the card at lower resolutions.

The GPU's percentile rank is 71 among all GPUs, placing it above average but not in the top tier. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, which scores 1.1% lower in average benchmark score, while the AMD Radeon R9 M395X is 0.5% higher. This positioning suggests the RX 6750 XT is a solid mid-range performer, and the Fivem results reflect that: it can handle 1080p and 1440p with ease, but 4K Ultra is beyond its comfort zone.

The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for Fivem's typical asset load, and the data shows no signs of memory-related stuttering in the measured rows. The Medium preset at 4K has a minimum FPS of 49, which is higher than the Ultra preset's average of 36, indicating that the card is not running out of memory but rather hitting compute limits at higher settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a Zen 5 architecture part with 8 cores and 16 threads, running on a 4 nm process from TSMC. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz and boost clock is 5.50 GHz, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU's single-thread score in PassMark is 4691, and its multithread score is 36470, which places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs.

In Fivem, the CPU's influence is most visible at 1080p where frame rates are highest. At 1080p Low, the system hits 200 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's practical limit for this game's simulation and network code. The drop to 1440p Low (132 FPS) is a 34% reduction, which is a larger percentage drop than the resolution change alone would suggest if the CPU were fully bottlenecked. This indicates that while the CPU is strong, the GPU is still the primary limiter even at lower settings.

The CPU's nearest rival data shows it performs nearly identically to the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which is 0.2% higher in average score, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, which is 0.7% higher. The Ryzen 7 9700F is 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K. This tight grouping means the 9700F is not leaving performance on the table in CPU-bound scenarios.

Looking at the PassMark physics score of 2122, which is a measure of gaming-related physics workloads, the CPU shows solid capability. The data suggests that at 1080p, the Ryzen 7 9700F is sufficient to push the RX 6750 XT to its limits, as the GPU's 71st percentile rank is lower than the CPU's 94th percentile. This imbalance means the GPU is the bottleneck in most scenarios, and the CPU has headroom for future GPU upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combination in Fivem?

A: 2560x1440 is the best balance. At High settings, it delivers 83 FPS, which is smooth for multiplayer. The 1080p results are higher (126 FPS at High), but 1440p offers a better visual quality per frame rate trade-off, and the 4K results require a settings compromise.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT compare to its nearest rivals in terms of raw GPU score?

A: The RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26011. The AMD Radeon R9 M395X is 0.5% higher, the AMD FirePro W7100 is 0.6% higher, and the AMD FirePro D700 is 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 1.1% lower.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9700F a bottleneck for the RX 6750 XT in Fivem?

A: No, the data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 94th percentile rank among all CPUs is much higher than the GPU's 71st percentile, and the FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are consistent with GPU-bound scaling.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 4K with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 58 FPS, with a minimum of 49 and a maximum of 66. This is playable, but the frame rate will dip in busy multiplayer scenes, and Low settings at 4K produce 73 FPS for a smoother experience.

Q: How much performance is lost when going from Low to Ultra at 1080p?

A: The system produces 200 FPS at Low and 98 FPS at Ultra, a difference of 102 FPS. This represents a 51% drop in average frame rate, which is a substantial cost for the visual improvements.

Q: Does the CPU's multithread performance matter for this game?

A: The CPU's multithread score is 36470 in PassMark, which is strong. Fivem is a multiplayer game that can use multiple threads for server-side simulation and player handling, but the measured FPS data suggests the GPU is still the limiting factor in most settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of this system's performance across resolutions and settings. All figures are average FPS unless noted, and the data is measured, not estimated.

1920x1080:

• Low: 200 FPS average
• Medium: 158 FPS average, with a minimum of 134 and maximum of 182
• High: 126 FPS average
• Ultra: 98 FPS average

2560x1440:

• Low: 132 FPS average
• Medium: 104 FPS average, with a minimum of 88 and maximum of 120
• High: 83 FPS average
• Ultra: 65 FPS average

3840x2160:

• Low: 73 FPS average
• Medium: 58 FPS average, with a minimum of 49 and maximum of 66
• High: 46 FPS average
• Ultra: 36 FPS average

The Medium preset is the only one with reported minimum and maximum FPS values across all resolutions, which indicates the testing captured a full frame-time range. At 1080p, the gap between Medium and High is 32 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 28 FPS. This shows diminishing returns as you increase settings beyond Medium.

At 1440p, the pattern holds: Medium to High is a 21 FPS drop, and High to Ultra is an 18 FPS drop. The 4K results show a similar trend, with Medium to High dropping 12 FPS and High to Ultra dropping 10 FPS. The system's overall rank in Fivem is 1681 out of 3707 combinations, placing it in the 54.6th percentile of tested hardware configurations.

Settings Recommendations

The data clearly shows that the Medium preset is the most balanced choice for this system, especially at higher resolutions. At 1080p, Medium delivers 158 FPS, which is 42 FPS higher than High and 60 FPS lower than Low. This is a comfortable frame rate for any competitive multiplayer scenario, and the visual uplift over Low is significant.

At 1440p, Medium produces 104 FPS with a minimum of 88 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play. High at 1440p drops to 83 FPS, which is still playable, but the 21 FPS loss may not be worth the visual gains. Ultra at 1440p falls to 65 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced multiplayer, so Medium is the safer choice.

For 4K, Medium is the only viable preset for a consistently smooth experience, with 58 FPS and a minimum of 49 FPS. High at 4K drops to 46 FPS, which will feel stuttery in crowded areas, and Ultra at 36 FPS is not recommended. Low at 4K yields 73 FPS, but the visual compromise is severe, making Medium the best balance of quality and performance.

The general recommendation is to use Medium settings across all resolutions, then adjust based on personal preference. If you have a 144Hz monitor at 1080p, Medium gives you 158 FPS which is above the refresh rate. At 1440p, Medium's 104 FPS is ideal for 100Hz displays. At 4K, Medium is the only way to stay near 60 FPS, and the minimum of 49 FPS is acceptable for non-competitive play. The High preset is a fallback for those who prioritize visuals at 1080p, but the frame rate cost is steep relative to the visual improvement.