Fivem

# Fivem Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

This combination of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ranks at position 1097 out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations evaluated. The rank reflects a pairing where the CPU's strong multi-threaded capabilities complement the GPU's substantial rasterization power, though the game's unique multiplayer workload characteristics create interesting performance dynamics across settings and resolutions. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, yet their combined rank in Fivem suggests the game's specific engine demands prevent this hardware from reaching the very top tier of tested configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1097 out of 3005 places this pairing in the 36.5th percentile of all tested combinations, which is notably below what the individual component percentiles would suggest. The CPU's 95th percentile standing and the GPU's 86th percentile indicate that both parts are strong performers in isolation, yet Fivem's multiplayer-focused workload appears to introduce bottlenecks that prevent the system from achieving top-tier combined results. This rank suggests that while the hardware is far from weak, other tested configurations—likely those with different CPU-GPU balance points—manage to extract better overall performance in this specific game.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals provides context for its contribution to this combo's rank. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.6% higher than the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P in average benchmark scores. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7% and leads the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2%. These narrow margins indicate that the CPU is competitive with high-end desktop processors despite its mobile market segment designation, which helps explain why this combo achieves a respectable mid-tier rank rather than falling lower.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score of 49957 places it within a tight cluster of competitors. It scores 0.1% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, 0.4% above the Intel Arc A550M, 2% below the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, and 3.1% above the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. This positioning suggests the GPU provides solid but not class-leading rasterization performance, and the measured FPS data in Fivem reflects this—the card delivers playable frame rates but doesn't dominate the charts at higher settings.

The gap between component-level percentiles and the combo rank highlights how Fivem's engine scales with hardware in ways that don't perfectly align with synthetic benchmarks. The data indicates this pairing achieves a balanced but not exceptional position, with the CPU's strong multi-core performance helping maintain frame rates in CPU-bound multiplayer scenarios while the GPU's capabilities become the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti brings 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration provides ample capacity and throughput for Fivem's asset streaming and texture demands, particularly at 4K resolution where the measured data shows the GPU becoming the primary performance constraint. The base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2452 MHz represent the core operating frequencies, and the memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer rate.

The GPU's 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines form the backbone of its rendering capabilities. With 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, the card includes modern acceleration features, though Fivem's traditional rasterization-focused workload means these specialized units play a limited role in the measured performance. The 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate provide substantial raw throughput that manifests in the frame rates observed across the test matrix.

In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1080p, the measured frame rates range from 107 FPS at Ultra settings to 219 FPS at Low settings, indicating the GPU has headroom to spare when CPU performance can keep up. Moving to 1440p, the range shifts to 71-144 FPS across the same settings span, showing the expected performance degradation as pixel count increases. At 4K, the range tightens to 39-80 FPS, and the gap between Low and Ultra settings narrows in percentage terms, suggesting the GPU is becoming the dominant constraint.

The 16 GB VRAM capacity proves sufficient for Fivem at all tested settings and resolutions, as no memory-related performance anomalies appear in the data. The bandwidth figure of 896.0 GB/s supports high-resolution texture streaming without causing frame time spikes, though the measured minimum FPS values at Medium settings (54 FPS at 4K, 97 FPS at 1440p, 147 FPS at 1080p) show that frame pacing remains consistent even when the GPU is heavily loaded.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo's rank in Fivem compare to the individual component rankings?

A: The combo ranks 1097th out of 3005 tested configurations, while the CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. This discrepancy indicates Fivem's specific workload prevents the hardware from achieving top-tier combined results despite strong individual component performance.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: At 1440p, the combo delivers the most balanced experience, with frame rates ranging from 71 FPS at Ultra settings to 144 FPS at Low settings. This resolution provides a substantial visual quality improvement over 1080p while maintaining playable performance across all settings presets.

Q: How does the GPU's memory configuration affect Fivem performance?

A: The 16 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity and throughput for all tested settings and resolutions. No memory-related bottlenecks appear in the data, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings changes.

Q: Which settings preset delivers the highest frame rate at 1080p?

A: The Low preset achieves the highest average frame rate at 219 FPS, followed by Medium at 173 FPS, High at 138 FPS, and Ultra at 107 FPS. The Low preset provides more than double the frame rate of Ultra, though the visual quality trade-off is substantial.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this combo's Fivem performance?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, with 4K performance dropping to 39-80 FPS across settings. At 1080p, the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance allows the GPU to operate at higher utilization, resulting in frame rates up to 219 FPS.

Q: How does this combo's performance scale with settings changes at 4K?

A: At 4K, the average frame rates are 39 FPS at Ultra, 50 FPS at High, 63 FPS at Medium, and 80 FPS at Low. The jump from Medium to High costs 13 FPS, while High to Ultra costs another 11 FPS, showing diminishing returns as settings increase.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080 resolution, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all settings presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 219 FPS, providing an exceptionally smooth experience for competitive play. Medium settings produce an average of 173 FPS with minimum and maximum readings of 147 and 199 FPS respectively, indicating consistent frame pacing. High settings yield 138 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 107 FPS average. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a 112 FPS reduction, with each settings tier costing approximately 37-56 FPS from the previous tier.

Moving to 2560x1440 resolution, the performance envelope shifts downward while maintaining the same relative ordering. Low settings deliver 144 FPS average, which represents a 75 FPS drop from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce 114 FPS average with a minimum of 97 and maximum of 131 FPS. High settings yield 91 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 71 FPS. The resolution upgrade from 1080p to 1440p costs between 33-36 FPS across the settings range, with the absolute reduction being similar regardless of preset.

At 3840x2160 resolution, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and frame rates drop significantly. Low settings still manage 80 FPS average, representing a 64 FPS reduction from 1080p Low. Medium settings produce 63 FPS average with tight minimum and maximum readings of 54 and 73 FPS respectively. High settings yield 50 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 39 FPS. The resolution upgrade from 1440p to 4K costs between 64-71 FPS depending on settings, with the percentage reduction being more severe at higher quality presets.

The complete data set reveals a consistent pattern: each settings tier costs roughly 30-40% of the previous tier's frame rate at a given resolution, and each resolution step costs approximately 35-45% of the lower resolution's frame rate at a given settings preset. The Medium preset at each resolution provides the most balanced frame time data, as evidenced by the available minimum and maximum readings showing tighter variance than would be expected from the other presets.

Settings Recommendations

The Medium preset at each resolution offers the most balanced performance profile based on the measured data. At 1080p, Medium delivers 173 FPS average with a minimum of 147 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during demanding multiplayer scenes. At 1440p, Medium maintains 114 FPS average with a minimum of 97 FPS, which remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for fluid motion. At 4K, Medium produces 63 FPS average with a minimum of 54 FPS, providing playable performance when higher resolutions are preferred.

For players prioritizing maximum frame rates at 1080p, the Low preset's 219 FPS average offers the headroom needed for high refresh rate displays. However, the jump from Low to Medium costs 46 FPS at 1080p while providing substantial visual quality improvements, making Medium the more balanced choice for most scenarios. The High preset at 1080p delivers 138 FPS, which still supports high refresh rate gaming, but the additional 35 FPS cost from Medium to High may not justify the visual gains for competitive play.

At 1440p, the Medium preset's 114 FPS average with 97 FPS minimum represents the sweet spot for this resolution. The High preset's 91 FPS average remains playable, but the 23 FPS reduction from Medium introduces more noticeable frame time variance in busy multiplayer environments. The Ultra preset's 71 FPS at 1440p dips into territory where demanding scenes may cause perceptible stuttering, making it less recommended for sustained play.

For 4K gaming, the Low preset's 80 FPS average is the only setting that consistently exceeds 60 FPS, while Medium's 63 FPS average hovers near the threshold with a 54 FPS minimum. Players who prefer visual fidelity at 4K should accept the Medium preset's occasional dips below 60 FPS, while those prioritizing smoothness should use Low settings or consider dropping to 1440p Medium for a better balance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 brings 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, operating with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This Strix Halo processor features 64 MB of shared L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. The 4 nm process node from TSMC allows this mobile-market processor to achieve desktop-class performance, as evidenced by its 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is particularly relevant for Fivem's multiplayer workload, which involves processing many concurrent player states, vehicle physics, and world interactions. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 demonstrate strong parallel processing capability. The PassMark multi-thread score of 54934 and physics score of 3481 further indicate the CPU's ability to handle the complex simulation tasks that Fivem's engine requires.

The CPU's single-threaded performance, while less exceptional, remains competitive with scores of 2044 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2464 in Geekbench single-core. The PassMark single-thread score of 4147 shows that the Zen 5 architecture delivers solid per-core performance, which matters for Fivem's main thread that handles game logic and network synchronization. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz provides the clock speed headroom needed for these latency-sensitive tasks.

The CPU's LPDDR5X memory support with quad-channel configuration provides 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which complements the GPU's 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. This memory subsystem helps ensure that the CPU can feed data to the GPU without creating bottlenecks, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU's role is more prominent. The 64 MB L3 cache helps maintain low-latency access to frequently used game data, reducing the need for slower main memory accesses.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show how performance scales as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, revealing the shifting balance between CPU and GPU limitations. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 219 FPS, while at 4K Low it drops to 80 FPS—a 63.5% reduction. This substantial drop indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance can maintain high frame rates when the GPU has less work to do per frame.

The scaling pattern varies across settings presets, with the Low preset showing the largest absolute drop (139 FPS from 1080p to 4K) and the Ultra preset showing the smallest absolute drop (68 FPS). However, in percentage terms, the Ultra preset experiences a larger relative reduction of 63.6%, compared to the Low preset's 63.5%. This similarity suggests that the GPU's workload scaling with resolution follows a consistent pattern regardless of settings, with the pixel count increase from 1080p to 4K (a 4x increase in total pixels) driving most of the performance reduction.

The Medium preset, which has the most complete data including minimum and maximum FPS values, shows the clearest picture of resolution scaling. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops from 173 to 114, a 34.1% reduction. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops from 114 to 63, a 44.7% reduction. The minimum FPS values follow a similar pattern: 147 at 1080p, 97 at 1440p, and 54 at 4K. This progressive degradation indicates that the GPU's rendering capacity becomes increasingly strained as pixel count grows.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU achieve a balanced workload distribution, with the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance preventing it from becoming the bottleneck. At 1440p, the GPU begins to take on more of the performance burden, and at 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting component. The maximum FPS readings at Medium settings (199 at 1080p, 131 at 1440p, 73 at 4K) show that even peak performance scales downward with resolution, confirming that the GPU's fixed rendering resources determine the upper bound of frame rates as pixel count increases.