Fivem

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 lands at rank 1579 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it firmly in the middle of the database. This combo sits in the 47th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly half of the tested systems deliver higher average frame rates in this multiplayer title. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing rather than an extreme one; neither component is a bottleneck in a way that would push the combo toward the top of the charts, but the data shows consistent performance across all tested settings and resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1579 out of 3005 tested combinations places this CPU-GPU pairing in the lower-middle portion of the leaderboard for Fivem. With dataIsMeasured confirmed as true, these results come from actual benchmark runs rather than estimates. The rank indicates that while this system delivers playable frame rates, it does not compete with the top-tier combinations that dominate the upper percentiles. The CPU itself, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, holds a 95th percentile position among all CPUs tested, while the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The gap between the CPU’s high percentile and the GPU’s slightly lower percentile suggests that the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing, pulling the overall combo rank down from what the processor alone might achieve.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 posts an average benchmark score of 77740. That score is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513) and 1.6% higher than the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76492). It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76212) by 2.0%. However, the Intel Core i9-14900K (79097) leads this group, beating the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7%. These small deltas show that the CPU is highly competitive with other high-end processors, but the Fivem combo ranking is not solely determined by CPU strength.

For the GPU side, the RTX 4070’s average benchmark score of 37648 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628), a delta of just 0.1%. It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507) and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157). The RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) outpaces the RTX 4070 by 1.3%. These narrow margins indicate that the RTX 4070 is a mid-pack performer in the GPU hierarchy, and that positioning is reflected in the combo’s overall rank. The data shows that this pairing is not designed to top Fivem’s leaderboard but rather to deliver solid, consistent frame rates across a range of settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 brings 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU’s base clock runs at 1920 MHz, with a boost clock of 2475 MHz. Memory clocks are rated at 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective. These specifications are directly relevant to Fivem’s performance, as the game’s multiplayer environments often feature dense scenes with many player models and vehicles, which can stress both memory capacity and bandwidth.

In Fivem, the RTX 4070’s VRAM capacity of 12 GB proves sufficient across all tested settings, as the measured FPS data shows no catastrophic drops that would indicate memory overflow. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo averages 34 FPS, while dropping to Low settings at the same resolution raises the average to 69 FPS. The GPU’s 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines handle the rendering workload, but the frame rates suggest that Fivem’s draw calls and object complexity keep the GPU busy even at lower settings.

The GPU’s 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores are present but not heavily utilized in Fivem, which is primarily a CPU-bound multiplayer modification of Grand Theft Auto V. The RTX 4070’s FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS provides ample raw compute, yet the benchmark results indicate that the game’s engine does not fully leverage this capability. The measured FPS at 1080p Low hits 189 FPS average, showing that the GPU can push high frame rates when the resolution and settings are reduced, but at 4K Ultra the 34 FPS average reveals the GPU’s limits in this specific title.

The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648, places it just ahead of the Tesla P4 and RX Vega 56, but behind the RTX 4080 Mobile. In Fivem, this translates to a GPU that can handle 1440p gaming comfortably at medium to high settings, but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum quality. The data shows that the RTX 4070 is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking would otherwise suggest more headroom.

Resolution Scaling

Fivem’s measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling from 1080p to 4K. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo averages 189 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 Low drops the average to 124 FPS, a reduction of 34.4%. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls to 69 FPS, which is 63.5% lower than the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly stressed as pixel count rises, even with minimal graphical settings.

The scaling at High settings follows a similar trajectory. At 1080p High, the average is 119 FPS. At 1440p High, it drops to 78 FPS, a 34.5% decrease. At 4K High, the average is 44 FPS, representing a 63.0% drop from 1080p. The consistency of these percentage drops across Low and High settings suggests that the limiting component remains the GPU throughout the resolution range. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would show less variation with resolution changes, as the processor’s workload would remain similar regardless of pixel count.

Medium settings provide the only data with min and max FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the average is 149 FPS with a min of 127 and max of 171. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 98 FPS, with min and max at 83 and 113 respectively. At 4K Medium, the average is 54 FPS, with min and max at 46 and 63. The spread between min and max FPS widens as resolution increases, from 44 FPS at 1080p to 30 FPS at 1440p and 17 FPS at 4K. This tightening of the frame time distribution at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is working closer to its limits, reducing the variability that comes from CPU-driven frame pacing.

Ultra settings show the most pronounced resolution scaling. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 92 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it falls to 61 FPS, a 33.7% drop. At 4K Ultra, the average is just 34 FPS, a 63.0% reduction from 1080p. The fact that the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is nearly identical across all four settings (ranging from 63.0% to 63.5%) strongly suggests that the GPU is the dominant limiting factor. The CPU’s workload in Fivem, which involves simulating a multiplayer world, does not scale with resolution, so the consistent percentage drops point directly at the RTX 4070 as the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in Fivem?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 1579 out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the 47th percentile of all tested systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, which is 1.6% higher than both the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513) and the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76492), and 2.0% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76212). The Intel Core i9-14900K (79097) leads this group, beating the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7%.

Q: What is the RTX 4070’s position among GPUs?

A: The GPU holds an 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 37648. It is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507), and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (37157). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135) is 1.3% faster.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 189, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The lowest average FPS is 34, recorded at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: Which component limits performance in Fivem?

A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting factor. FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are consistent across all settings, with reductions of approximately 63% from 1080p to 4K, while the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking suggests it has more headroom.

Q: What are the GPU’s key memory specifications?

A: The RTX 4070 features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. Memory clocks run at 1313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers four settings levels across three resolutions, providing a complete picture of performance. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 189 FPS on Low, 149 FPS on Medium, 119 FPS on High, and 92 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting also records min and max values of 127 and 171 FPS respectively. These 1080p results show that the combo is capable of high refresh rate gaming at lower settings, with even Ultra settings maintaining a playable average above 90 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates drop to 124 FPS on Low, 98 FPS on Medium, 78 FPS on High, and 61 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting at 1440p records a min of 83 FPS and a max of 113 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1440p is a sweet spot for this combo, with High settings delivering 78 FPS average, which is suitable for most gaming scenarios. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across all settings, averaging around 34% reduction in frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more constrained. The average frame rates are 69 FPS on Low, 54 FPS on Medium, 44 FPS on High, and 34 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting at 4K records a min of 46 FPS and a max of 63 FPS. These 4K results show that the combo can handle 4K at Low settings with reasonable smoothness, but Ultra settings drop below the 60 FPS threshold, making high-refresh 4K gaming impractical with this pairing.

The full dataset reveals a clear hierarchy: 1080p Low delivers the highest average at 189 FPS, followed by 1080p Medium at 149 FPS, 1080p High at 119 FPS, and 1080p Ultra at 92 FPS. At 1440p, the order is Low (124 FPS), Medium (98 FPS), High (78 FPS), and Ultra (61 FPS). At 4K, the order is Low (69 FPS), Medium (54 FPS), High (44 FPS), and Ultra (34 FPS). The only setting with min and max data is Medium, which shows min FPS values of 127 at 1080p, 83 at 1440p, and 46 at 4K, with corresponding max values of 171, 113, and 63.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU has a 64 MB shared L3 cache, with 1 MB L2 and 80 KB L1 per core. This processor is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process node and features a TDP of 55 W. It supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is significant because the game is known for being CPU-intensive in multiplayer scenarios. The 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample parallelism for handling the many entities and scripts that Fivem introduces. The CPU’s benchmark scores reflect its strength: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35314 and a single-core score of 2044, along with a Geekbench multicore score of 20992 and single-core score of 2464. These numbers place the CPU in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating that it is among the top processors available.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513), AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76492), AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76212), and Intel Core i9-14900K (79097). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395’s score of 77740 positions it above the three AMD rivals but below the Intel offering. This competitive positioning suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck in Fivem, as its performance is comparable to or better than many high-end desktop processors.

The CPU’s integrated graphics, Radeon 8060S, is present but not used in this combo, as the discrete RTX 4070 handles all rendering. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X is substantial, which helps feed the GPU with data in Fivem’s open-world environment. The 64 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, reducing latency for frequently accessed data. The 4 nm process node from TSMC contributes to the CPU’s efficiency, with a TDP of just 55 W, though this mobile-oriented design is paired with a desktop-class GPU in this test configuration.

Looking at the measured FPS data, the CPU’s strength is evident at 1080p, where frame rates are high across all settings, reaching 189 FPS at Low. At this resolution, the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output, but as resolution increases, the GPU’s workload grows while the CPU’s remains constant. The consistent percentage drops from 1080p to 4K (around 63% across all settings) confirm that the CPU is not limiting performance, as the frame rate scales directly with pixel count. If the CPU were the constraint, the 4K results would show relatively higher frame rates compared to 1080p, since the CPU would be the bottleneck at all resolutions. Instead, the data shows the GPU struggling at 4K, with the CPU waiting for the graphics card to complete its work.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R15 single-core (316) and Geekbench single-core (2464), is strong, which matters for Fivem’s often single-threaded script execution. The PassMark single-thread score of 4147 reinforces this capability. The CPU’s multithreaded scores, including PassMark multithread at 54934 and PassMark integer math at 200665, indicate that it can handle the many background tasks that Fivem’s multiplayer servers generate. In summary, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 provides more than enough processing power for Fivem, and the combo’s mid-pack ranking is attributed to the RTX 4070’s limitations at higher resolutions and settings.