Fivem

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a performance curve in Fivem that is heavily dictated by resolution and preset selection. The data shows a clear transition from a CPU-bound state at 1080p to a GPU-bound state at 4K, with the mid-range 1440p offering the most balanced experience. This combination ranks 455th out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the top 25.4% of all configurations, a strong result for a multiplayer title where high frame rates are often prioritized over absolute visual fidelity.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling behavior from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a significant shift in system bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 260.3 FPS, a figure that suggests the CPU is doing the heavy lifting, as the GPU is far from saturated. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same Low preset drops performance to 172.6 FPS, a reduction of 33.7% — a steep decline that indicates the GPU is starting to become a more significant factor. By the time resolution reaches 3840x2160, the Low preset yields just 93.8 FPS, which is a 64% drop from the 1080p figure. This steep scaling curve is characteristic of a GPU that is being pushed hard at higher pixel counts.

The pattern holds across all settings. At Ultra, the combo manages 124.7 FPS at 1080p, 83.4 FPS at 1440p, and 43.9 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is particularly telling: a 64.8% reduction from the 1080p Ultra score. This indicates that at 4K, the RTX 4070’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed heavily, and the 20-core i7-14700K is no longer the limiting factor. The transition happens between 1440p and 4K; at 1440p, the CPU still has headroom, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck across all presets.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide a clear hierarchy for settings optimization. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 124.7 FPS, which is smooth for most displays, but the Medium preset jumps to 207.4 FPS — a 66.3% improvement over Ultra. The data suggests that for competitive play at 1080p, Medium is the sweet spot, offering a substantial frame rate boost while presumably retaining enough visual quality for situational awareness. Low at 1080p reaches 260.3 FPS, but this comes at the cost of visibility, which is often counterproductive in a multiplayer environment.

At 2560x1440, the High preset produces 108.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for most gaming monitors. However, Medium provides 136.4 FPS, a 25.6% increase over High, making it the recommended choice for users with 144Hz panels. Ultra at 1440p drops to 83.4 FPS, which is playable but sacrifices the margin needed for consistent high-refresh-rate gameplay. The data indicates that for 1440p, Medium offers the best balance of frame rate and visual fidelity, as the gap between Medium and High is larger than the gap between High and Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more constrained. High yields 60.1 FPS, which is exactly at the standard 60Hz refresh rate, but any demanding scene could cause dips below that threshold. Medium offers 73.1 FPS, providing a small cushion, while Low jumps to 93.8 FPS. For 4K, the recommendation is to stick with Medium if the display supports variable refresh rate, as it provides a 21.6% improvement over High. Ultra at 4K is not recommended, as the 43.9 FPS average falls below the playable threshold for most users.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 455 out of 1792 tested combinations places it in the 74.6th percentile of all tested systems. This is a strong showing, especially considering the game’s nature as a multiplayer mod for Grand Theft Auto V, which often relies on CPU single-thread performance. The i7-14700K’s boost clock of 5.60 GHz and its Passmark single-thread score of 4472 are critical assets in this scenario. The CPU’s overall percentile of 96 against all CPUs indicates that it is a top-tier processor, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, scores virtually identically with a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X trails by 0.5%, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 is 1.4% behind.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 holds an 81st percentile ranking against all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, is only 0.6% behind in average benchmark score, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 2.2% ahead. This suggests that while the RTX 4070 is not a top-tier GPU, it is well-matched with the i7-14700K for this specific title. The combo rank indicates that the pairing is more effective than 74.6% of all tested combinations, which is impressive given the GPU’s mid-range positioning.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset provides exact figures for all twelve tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 260.3 FPS on Low, 207.4 FPS on Medium, 163.7 FPS on High, and 124.7 FPS on Ultra. The spread between Low and Ultra is 135.6 FPS, showing that settings have a massive impact at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the figures are 172.6 FPS on Low, 136.4 FPS on Medium, 108.6 FPS on High, and 83.4 FPS on Ultra. The spread here narrows to 89.2 FPS, reflecting the increased GPU load.

At 3840x2160, the numbers drop significantly: 93.8 FPS on Low, 73.1 FPS on Medium, 60.1 FPS on High, and 43.9 FPS on Ultra. The spread between Low and Ultra is 49.9 FPS, which is the smallest of the three resolutions. This compression indicates that at 4K, even the Low preset is GPU-limited. The data shows a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, the absolute frame rates drop and the relative differences between settings shrink, confirming the shift from CPU to GPU bottleneck.

GPU Role

The RTX 4070’s specifications play a direct role in the observed results. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the bandwidth becomes a limiting factor, especially at Ultra settings where texture data requirements increase. The boost clock of 2475 MHz and the FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS provide ample compute power for most scenes, but the 4K Ultra result of 43.9 FPS indicates that the GPU is reaching its limits.

The GPU’s 64 ROPs and 184 TMUs are also relevant. At 1080p, the pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s is more than enough to handle the workload, but at 4K, the pixel throughput requirements quadruple, and the GPU’s fill rate becomes a bottleneck. The texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s is similarly taxed at higher resolutions. The card’s 200W TDP and dual-slot design are consistent with its mid-range positioning, and the data shows that it performs as expected: strong at 1080p, capable at 1440p, and adequate at 4K with reduced settings. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and launch MSRP of 599 USD position it as a previous-generation solution, but the measured FPS in Fivem shows it remains a viable option for this title.