Fivem

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers a performance profile that is heavily dictated by resolution and preset selection. The measured data shows a system capable of high refresh rates at 1080p, but one that requires careful settings management to maintain playable frame rates at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across all tested configurations, interprets the scaling behavior, and provides practical guidance for optimizing the experience in Fivem.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is significant and reveals a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 138 at 1920x1080 to 91 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 47 FPS. Moving further to 3840x2160, the average falls to 50 FPS, representing a 64% decrease from the 1080p result. This steep decline indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the limiting component as pixel count increases, with the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads providing ample headroom at lower resolutions.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all presets. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 219 at 1080p to 144 at 1440p, then drops to 80 at 4K. This 139 FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at Low settings is the largest absolute drop observed, showing that even when graphical load is minimized, the GPU cannot sustain high frame rates at 4K. At Ultra settings, the averages are 107, 71, and 39 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K respectively, with the 4K result falling below the 40 FPS threshold that many players consider a minimum for smooth gameplay.

The data suggests that 1440p is the practical ceiling for this combo if aiming for high refresh rates. At Medium settings, the 1440p average of 114 FPS is close to the 1080p Medium result of 173 FPS, but the 4K Medium average of 63 FPS indicates a clear performance cliff. The min FPS data at Medium settings reinforces this: 147 FPS at 1080p, 97 FPS at 1440p, and 54 FPS at 4K. The 4K min FPS of 54 is below what most competitive multiplayer players would accept, despite the average being 63.

This resolution scaling behavior points to a system where the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile’s 12 GB GDDR7 memory and 192-bit bus are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU’s raw compute (17.04 TFLOPS FP32) is stretched at 4K. The CPU, with its 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, does not appear to bottleneck at any tested resolution, as the FPS drops align with the increased pixel workload rather than any CPU limitation.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the data supports using Ultra or High presets without concern. The Ultra preset yields 107 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS standard, and High delivers 138 FPS for a smoother experience. The Low preset at 219 FPS offers no practical benefit for most displays, and the Medium preset’s 173 FPS sits between High and Low, making High the best balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts to High or Medium depending on display refresh rate. High settings produce a 91 FPS average, which is excellent for 60 Hz and 120 Hz monitors. Medium settings push the average to 114 FPS, with a min FPS of 97, making it the better choice for 120 Hz displays. Ultra at 71 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes, while Low at 144 FPS is unnecessarily fast for most users. The sweet spot is Medium if you prioritize smoothness, or High if you prefer visual fidelity.

For 4K, the measured data indicates that only Low settings provide a consistently playable experience, with an average of 80 FPS. Medium settings at 63 FPS average and 54 FPS minimum are borderline, and High at 50 FPS average will feel sluggish in a multiplayer environment. Ultra at 39 FPS is not recommended for Fivem, as the game’s multiplayer nature demands responsiveness over visual extremes. If 4K is a priority, the data suggests sticking with Low settings to maintain a playable frame rate.

The overall recommendation across all resolutions is to use Medium settings as a baseline, then adjust based on your priority. Medium delivers 173 FPS at 1080p, 114 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K, representing the most balanced performance across the board. The min FPS values at Medium—147, 97, and 54 respectively—show that even in demanding moments, the system remains responsive. For players who value visual quality over raw frame rate, High settings are a viable alternative at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K High result of 50 FPS average is too low for comfortable play.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The measured data shows 2560x1440 as the optimal resolution, balancing visual fidelity with performance. At 1440p Medium, the average FPS is 114 with a min of 97, providing smooth gameplay. At 4K, even Low settings only reach 80 FPS average, while at 1080p the system is often CPU-light with GPU headroom to spare.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile perform at 4K in Fivem?

A: The GPU manages 80 FPS average at Low settings, 63 FPS at Medium, 50 FPS at High, and 39 FPS at Ultra. The min FPS at Medium is 54, indicating that 4K gameplay requires Low settings for a consistently smooth experience, as the higher presets fall below acceptable thresholds for multiplayer.

Q: Is the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: No, the data shows no CPU bottleneck at 1080p. The 16-core, 32-thread processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers 219 FPS at Low settings and 138 FPS at High settings, which are high enough to saturate most displays. The CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor at any resolution tested.

Q: What settings should I use for a 120 Hz monitor?

A: At 1080p, High settings (138 FPS) or Medium (173 FPS) both exceed 120 FPS. At 1440p, Medium settings (114 FPS average, 97 FPS min) are the best choice to stay near 120 Hz, while High (91 FPS) falls short. At 4K, no preset consistently reaches 120 FPS, with Low (80 FPS) being the highest average.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1413 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the top 38% of all tested systems. This indicates a solid mid-to-high tier performance level, with the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking versus all CPUs contributing significantly to the overall result.

Q: What is the difference between Ultra and Low settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is 73 FPS on average, with Ultra at 71 FPS and Low at 144 FPS. This represents a 103% performance increase from Ultra to Low, showing that Fivem’s Ultra preset imposes a heavy load on the GPU. Medium sits at 114 FPS, offering a 60% improvement over Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile achieves a rank of 1413 out of 3707 total combos. This places the system in the 62nd percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly 38% of tested combos perform better. The rank reflects the combined capabilities of both components, and the measured FPS data shows that the system excels at 1080p and 1440p but struggles at 4K.

The CPU’s individual percentile of 95 versus all CPUs indicates that the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a top-tier processor, outperforming 95% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 77740 places it slightly below the Intel Core i9-14900K (79097, deltaPct -1.7) but above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513, deltaPct 1.6) and AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76212, deltaPct 2). This strong CPU performance helps the combo achieve its rank, especially in a game like Fivem which can be CPU-sensitive in multiplayer scenarios.

The GPU’s percentile of 80 versus all GPUs is lower than the CPU’s, and its average benchmark score of 35435 places it near the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (35520, deltaPct -0.2) and AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35860, deltaPct -1.2), while being slightly ahead of the NVIDIA A2 (34690, deltaPct 2.1). This mid-tier GPU performance is the limiting factor for the combo’s overall rank, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck.

The rank of 1413 out of 3707 is respectable but not exceptional, reflecting the GPU’s limitations at 4K. In practical terms, this combo is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers high frame rates across most settings. For 4K, the system requires significant settings adjustments to remain playable, which is consistent with the GPU’s 80th percentile ranking. The CPU’s strength ensures that the system will not be CPU-bound in Fivem, making the GPU the component to upgrade if seeking better 4K performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 brings substantial processing power to this combo, with 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture. The base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044 and Geekbench single-core score of 2464. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle the per-thread demands of Fivem’s multiplayer environment, where many players and entities need to be tracked simultaneously.

The multi-threaded performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20992. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache is particularly beneficial for a game like Fivem, which often involves streaming large amounts of world data and player information. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth from the quad-channel LPDDR5X support ensures that data can flow quickly between the CPU and memory, reducing potential stuttering in busy scenes.

The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740, places it in elite company. It is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, and 2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, while being 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K. These rival comparisons show that the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is competitive with top desktop and workstation processors, despite being a mobile part with a 55 W TDP.

In the context of Fivem, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. The measured FPS data confirms that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 219 FPS average, which is far above what most displays can show, indicating that the CPU can handle the game’s logic at high speed. The 16 cores and 32 threads also provide future-proofing for games that may use more threads, though Fivem’s current engine appears to benefit most from the high boost clock and large cache.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 219 FPS, which is the maximum measured in this test suite. The Medium preset produces 173 FPS average, with a minimum of 147 FPS and maximum of 199 FPS, showing consistent performance. High settings yield 138 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 107 FPS average. These results indicate that 1080p is well within the capabilities of this combo, with even the most demanding preset exceeding 100 FPS.

The 2560x1440 results show a noticeable step down from 1080p. Low settings average 144 FPS, which is exactly double the 4K Low result. Medium settings average 114 FPS, with a minimum of 97 FPS and maximum of 131 FPS, providing a smooth experience for most displays. High settings average 91 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS for standard monitors. Ultra settings average 71 FPS, which is playable but may dip in demanding scenes. The 1440p data shows that Medium is the best choice for high refresh rates, while High is suitable for 60 Hz displays.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. Low settings average 80 FPS, which is the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and maximum of 73 FPS, making it borderline for smooth play. High settings average 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard and will be noticeable in a fast-paced multiplayer game. Ultra settings average 39 FPS, which is not recommended for any gameplay scenario. The 4K results show a clear hierarchy: Low for playable performance, Medium for acceptable performance, and High/Ultra for screenshots or non-competitive play.

The min FPS data, available only for Medium settings, provides insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the min FPS of 147 represents 85% of the average, indicating tight frame pacing. At 1440p, the min FPS of 97 is also 85% of the average of 114. At 4K, the min FPS of 54 is 86% of the average of 63. This consistency across resolutions suggests that the system maintains stable performance without major stutters, though the absolute min FPS at 4K is low enough to impact gameplay feel.