Fivem

Fivem’s measured performance with the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT shows a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions and presets, with the data indicating a strong CPU-driven foundation. The combo ranks 1081st out of 3005 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database, while the 12-core, 24-thread processor and 12 GB graphics card produce frame rates that range from playable at 4K Ultra to exceptionally high at 1080p Low. The following analysis breaks down the numbers from the FACT PACK, interpreting what each score and FPS figure means relative to the nearest rivals and the broader tested pool.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested configurations in Fivem?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination ranks 1081st out of 3005 tested combos, which places it in the 64th percentile of all tested systems (calculated from the rank and total).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55093) and 1.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54053). It also leads the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701) by 2% and the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620) by 2.1%.

Q: What is the GPU's relative standing against its closest competitors?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22549 on average, sitting 0.5% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435) and 1.7% above the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (22170). It trails the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729) by 0.8% and the RTX 2080 (22895) by 1.5%.

Q: What is the best 1080p result recorded in the measured data?

A: The highest average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 219 FPS on Low settings. The Medium preset delivers 173 FPS, High yields 138 FPS, and Ultra drops to 107 FPS.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the combo first dip below 60 FPS?

A: The only measured average below 60 FPS is at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average is 39 FPS. At 4K High, the average is 51 FPS, while 4K Medium holds at 63 FPS.

Q: What does the data show about frame time consistency at 1440p Medium?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 114, with a minimum of 97 FPS and a maximum of 131 FPS. This 34 FPS spread between min and max indicates moderate variance, but the minimum remains well above 60 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 32 chip, featuring 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The memory operates at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 1435 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. These specs place the card in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22549.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes evident when examining the scaling from 1080p to 4K. At 1920x1080 Low, the card produces 219 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding frames well beyond the GPU's limits at that resolution. However, at 3840x2160 Ultra, the average drops to 39 FPS, indicating the GPU becomes the primary limiter as pixel count increases. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for the measured presets, as none of the settings rows show signs of memory capacity throttling, but the bandwidth and compute throughput (35.17 TFLOPS FP32) dictate the upper ceiling at higher resolutions.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the RX 7700 XT's average score of 22549 is nearly identical to the RTX 5060 Mobile (22435) and RTX 4060 Mobile (22729), with deltas of 0.5% and -0.8% respectively. This parity in synthetic benchmarks suggests that in Fivem, the RX 7700 XT's performance should be similar to those NVIDIA parts, though the actual FPS will depend on driver optimizations and the game's specific workload. The GPU's 96 ROPs and 216 TMUs contribute to the pixel and texture rates of 244.2 GPixel/s and 549.5 GTexel/s, which are relevant for the fill-rate demands of Fivem's open-world rendering.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and RX 7700 XT achieves a rank of 1081 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This position places the system in the top 36% of all configurations, but the percentile data from the CPU (91st) and GPU (67th) suggests the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. The CPU's high percentile versus all CPUs indicates it is a top-tier processor, while the GPU's mid-range percentile means the combo's overall rank is constrained by the graphics card in GPU-bound scenarios.

When looking at the measured FPS across all resolutions, the combo's rank is consistent with a system that can handle 1080p and 1440p very well but struggles at 4K Ultra. At 1080p Low, the 219 FPS average is in the top tier of what any tested system could achieve, reflecting the CPU's strength. At 4K Ultra, the 39 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold, which aligns with the GPU's 67th percentile standing. The rank of 1081 suggests that many combos with faster GPUs but slower CPUs might achieve similar or better FPS at higher resolutions, while combos with similar GPUs but weaker CPUs would fall behind at lower resolutions.

The deltaPct values from the nearest rivals provide context for the CPU's contribution. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D's average score is within 2.1% of its closest competitors, meaning the CPU is not a differentiator in synthetic tests. However, in Fivem, the 3D V-Cache (128 MB L3) likely provides a real-world advantage in scenarios with many draw calls or entity updates, even if the benchmark scores are similar. The combo rank reflects this nuance: it is not a top-100 system, but it outperforms the vast majority of tested configurations, particularly in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 219 on Low to 107 on Ultra. The Medium preset yields 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 and maximum of 199, while High produces 138 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, even the most demanding preset remains comfortably above 100 FPS, making the combo well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop but remain strong: Low delivers 144 FPS, Medium 114 FPS (min 97, max 131), High 91 FPS, and Ultra 71 FPS. The 1440p Medium result is particularly noteworthy because the minimum of 97 FPS ensures no noticeable stutter even in busy scenes. At High, the 91 FPS average is still smooth for most displays, while Ultra at 71 FPS approaches the edge of 60 FPS but stays above it.

At 3840x2160, the performance falls off significantly. Low produces 80 FPS, Medium 63 FPS (min 54, max 73), High 51 FPS, and Ultra 39 FPS. The 4K Medium result is the only 4K preset with a minimum above 60 FPS (54 FPS minimum is below, but the average is 63). High and Ultra both dip below the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging only 39 FPS. These figures indicate that 4K gaming is only viable on Low or Medium settings, and even then, the minimum FPS at Medium (54) suggests occasional dips below 60.

The between-resolution scaling reveals a consistent pattern: dropping from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 30-35% of the frame rate, while dropping from 1440p to 4K costs another 40-45%. For example, at High settings, the FPS goes from 138 (1080p) to 91 (1440p) to 51 (4K). This nonlinear drop indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly stressed as resolution increases, with the 4K Ultra result (39 FPS) being less than a third of the 1080p Low result (219 FPS).

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 120 W TDP. The CPU features 128 MB of L3 cache, which is the hallmark of the X3D lineup and provides a significant advantage in games that benefit from large cache sizes. Its memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 47737 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6739 in single-core, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 22884 and single-core of 3041. These numbers place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54762. The nearest rivals show that the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is 0.6% faster on average, but the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's single-thread performance (1269 in 3DMark single-thread) is competitive, which matters for Fivem's often single-threaded simulation logic.

The CPU's role in Fivem is evident from the 1080p Low result of 219 FPS. This figure is likely near the engine's frame rate cap or the CPU's limit for issuing draw calls, given that the GPU has plenty of headroom at that resolution. The 12 cores and 24 threads ensure that background tasks and server communication in this multiplayer game do not starve the main rendering thread. The 3D V-Cache (128 MB L3) reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data, which can improve frame pacing in densely populated areas of the game world.

Compared to its rivals, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's average benchmark score is within 2% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and 245KF, and slightly ahead of the Xeon 6505P and Core i7-14700F. This parity means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the choice between these processors would yield similar FPS, but the X3D's cache advantage might tilt the scales in Fivem's favor, particularly when many players or vehicles are on screen.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and frame rate preference. For 1080p, all presets deliver playable frame rates, but the High preset (138 FPS) offers a good balance between visual quality and performance for 144Hz displays. The Ultra preset (107 FPS) is still above 100 FPS and provides the best image quality, making it the recommended choice for 1080p users with high-refresh-rate monitors who prioritize visuals.

At 1440p, the Medium preset (114 FPS average, 97 FPS minimum) is the clear winner for maintaining a smooth experience, as it stays above 90 FPS at all times. The High preset (91 FPS) is also viable for 60Hz displays, but the 71 FPS Ultra result begins to approach the edge of comfort for 75Hz monitors. For users with 144Hz 1440p displays, Medium is the only preset that consistently delivers frame rates near the refresh rate, while those with 60Hz displays can comfortably use High.

For 4K, the choices are more constrained. The Low preset (80 FPS) is the only option that maintains an average above 60 FPS, while Medium (63 FPS) averages above 60 but has a minimum of 54 FPS, which could cause noticeable dips. The High (51 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) presets are not recommended for 4K if a smooth experience is required, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The data suggests that 4K users should either accept Low settings for competitive play or drop to 1440p and use High or Ultra for a better visual experience.

The overall recommendation is to use Medium settings for 1440p as the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, as it provides the highest minimum FPS among the presets that maintain a 60+ FPS average at that resolution. For 1080p, Ultra is recommended given the 107 FPS average, and for 4K, Low is the only preset that guarantees a smooth experience.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K demonstrates how the system's limiting component shifts with resolution. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 219 FPS, which is 2.7 times the 4K Low result of 80 FPS. This scaling factor indicates that the CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p, as the GPU has enough headroom to render frames faster than the CPU can feed them. The 219 FPS figure is likely close to the engine's maximum or the CPU's single-thread limit.

At Medium settings, the FPS drops from 173 (1080p) to 114 (1440p) to 63 (4K). The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 34%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 45%. This increasing percentage drop as resolution rises indicates that the GPU becomes more dominant in limiting performance. The 4K Medium minimum of 54 FPS shows that the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the preset, but the compute throughput (35.17 TFLOPS) is not enough to maintain higher averages.

For High settings, the scaling is 138 (1080p) to 91 (1440p) to 51 (4K), with drops of 34% and 44% respectively. This pattern is consistent with Medium, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At Ultra, the results are 107 (1080p), 71 (1440p), and 39 (4K), with drops of 34% and 45%. The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is less than half of the 1080p Ultra result, showing that the RX 7700 XT cannot handle the pixel count of 4K with maximum settings.

The data suggests that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is never the bottleneck at 4K, as the GPU's performance drops are consistent with its synthetic benchmark standing (67th percentile). Conversely, at 1080p Low, the CPU's 91st percentile ranking is what allows the 219 FPS result, as the GPU would likely be capable of higher frame rates if the CPU could feed them. This analysis indicates that for users who primarily play at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU is a strong investment, while the GPU will need to be upgraded to achieve higher 4K performance.