Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a performance profile in Fivem that is heavily skewed by the graphics processor. The data indicates a combination where the CPU has substantial headroom, but the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to understand the scaling behavior, the role of each component, and where this combo stands in the broader database.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for this combo shows a steep and consistent performance drop as resolution increases, which is a clear indicator of GPU-bound behavior. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 88 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the average falls to 58 FPS, a reduction of 30 FPS, or roughly 34% lower. At 4K Low, the average drops further to 32 FPS, which is 56 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result, representing a 64% decrease. This pattern of performance halving with each major resolution step is typical of a system where the graphics card is the limiting factor.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K is not linear, but rather exponential in its impact on frame rate. For instance, at High settings, the 1080p average is 56 FPS, which drops to 37 FPS at 1440p and then to 20 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1440p and 4K (17 FPS) is nearly as large as the gap between 1080p and 1440p (19 FPS), despite the smaller pixel count difference. This suggests that the GPU's rendering capabilities are being overwhelmed as the pixel count increases, with the 4K resolution proving particularly demanding for the Intel Arc B390.

What this resolution scaling reveals is that the limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a much flatter performance curve across resolutions, as the CPU's workload would remain constant while the GPU's work increases. The fact that FPS drops so dramatically with resolution indicates that the Intel Arc B390 is running out of processing power, while the Ryzen 9 9900X is likely waiting for the GPU to deliver frames. The data shows a low-end graphics solution struggling to maintain playable frame rates at higher resolutions, with only the 1080p Low setting surpassing the 60 FPS mark.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the decisive factor in this combo's gaming performance. Its benchmark scores are extremely low, placing it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The only benchmark recorded for this GPU is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482, which puts it in direct competition with very old, low-end parts like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM. The data shows this GPU is not designed for demanding modern gaming workloads, and Fivem is no exception.

The GPU's specifications support the observed performance ceiling. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, which are modest figures for a modern graphics card. More importantly, it uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and instead relies on the system's main memory. The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which is a major limiting factor for a game like Fivem that often requires streaming large amounts of data, especially in multiplayer environments. The bus width is also "System Shared," further indicating that the memory subsystem is not optimized for high-bandwidth graphics workloads.

The GPU's architecture, Xe3-LPG, is based on a 3 nm process and includes 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. Its compute capabilities are listed at 7.680 TFLOPS for FP32, which is a low figure. This hardware profile is reflected in the measured FPS, where even at 1080p Low, the average of 88 FPS is the only result that approaches a smooth experience. At Ultra settings, the GPU cannot keep up, with the average FPS falling to 43 at 1080p and a mere 16 at 4K. The data shows that this GPU is the sole reason the combo fails to deliver high frame rates, as its performance is consistently at the bottom of the spectrum, rivaling products from over a decade ago.

CPU Role

In stark contrast to the GPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a high-end processor with substantial performance headroom. The data shows it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores are impressive, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. For example, it scores 32,172 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 22,174 in Geekbench multi-core, and 54,643 in Passmark multithread. These are scores of a powerful desktop processor, far beyond what is needed for a game like Fivem.

The CPU's role in this combo appears to be one of an enabler rather than a driver. Given the GPU's low performance, the Ryzen 9 9900X is likely never the bottleneck. Its 12 cores and 24 threads are more than sufficient for Fivem's workload, which is typically not heavily multi-threaded but does benefit from high single-core performance. The CPU's single-thread scores are also strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 3010 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2253, which ensures that the game's main thread is well-served.

The data suggests that the CPU is essentially idle waiting for the GPU. The difference between the CPU's capabilities and the GPU's output is vast. The Ryzen 9 9900X's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-14900, have similar average scores, indicating it is a top-tier part. In this specific pairing, the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution or setting. The measured FPS falls off a cliff as resolution increases, which is a hallmark of a GPU bottleneck. If the CPU were the issue, the FPS would be lower at 1080p and would not improve as much when lowering settings. The fact that 1080p Low achieves 88 FPS while 4K Ultra achieves only 16 FPS shows that the CPU can push frames, but the GPU cannot render them at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 9900X and the Intel Arc B390 ranks at 2656 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 12% of all systems in the database. This is a poor ranking that is directly attributable to the GPU's performance. The CPU is ranked in the 92nd percentile, but the GPU's 9th percentile ranking drags the entire combo down to a level that is barely competitive with budget systems from years ago.

This ranking indicates a severe mismatch in component tiers. The data shows that the CPU is a top-tier part, but the GPU is a bottom-tier part. The combination results in a system that performs like a low-end machine, despite the presence of a high-end processor. The ranking of 2656 out of 3005 means that the vast majority of other tested combinations, even those with much weaker CPUs, outperform this setup because they are paired with more capable graphics cards. The benchmark results indicate that this combo is not suitable for a smooth Fivem experience at anything but the lowest settings and resolution. The CPU's power is effectively wasted in this configuration, as the GPU cannot take advantage of the processor's ability to feed it frames.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 88, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B390's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482 is 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX's score of 1463, and 2.7% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710's score of 1443.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The data shows the GPU is the bottleneck. The FPS drops dramatically as resolution increases, from 88 FPS at 1080p Low to 32 FPS at 4K Low, while the CPU's high benchmark scores indicate it has significant headroom.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems for Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 2656 out of 3005 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 12% of all systems.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS is 56 at 1920x1080 and drops to 20 at 3840x2160, a difference of 36 FPS.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated video memory?

A: No, the Intel Arc B390 uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it relies on the system's main memory rather than having its own dedicated VRAM.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the only settings that provide a reasonably playable experience are at 1920x1080 with Low or Medium settings. The Low preset at 1080p delivers an average of 88 FPS, which is the only configuration that clears the 60 FPS threshold comfortably. The Medium preset at 1080p also offers a playable experience, with an average of 70 FPS, though it has a minimum FPS of 59, which could lead to occasional stutters. For a smoother experience, the Low preset is the safest choice, as it provides a significant margin over the minimum frame rate.

At 1440p, the experience becomes marginal. The Low preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average of 58 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target. This could be playable for some, but the Medium preset at 1440p drops to an average of 46 FPS, which is not ideal for a fast-paced multiplayer game. At 4K, none of the settings are recommended. Even the Low preset at 3840x2160 only achieves 32 FPS, which is too low for smooth gameplay.

The data shows a clear trade-off between visual quality and performance. The High and Ultra presets are not viable at any resolution in this combo. At 1080p, High yields 56 FPS and Ultra yields 43 FPS, both of which are below the standard for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset at 4K is the worst performer, with an average of 16 FPS, making it unplayable. The recommendation is to use the Low preset at 1080p for the best balance of performance, or Medium if the user can tolerate occasional frame dips. The higher settings and resolutions are not recommended due to the GPU's limitations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's performance across all tested configurations. The following is a detailed breakdown of the average FPS for each resolution and settings preset.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 88 FPS average
• Medium: 70 FPS average, with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 80
• High: 56 FPS average
• Ultra: 43 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 58 FPS average
• Medium: 46 FPS average, with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53
• High: 37 FPS average
• Ultra: 29 FPS average

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 32 FPS average
• Medium: 25 FPS average, with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 29
• High: 20 FPS average
• Ultra: 16 FPS average

This data confirms the severe performance degradation as resolution and settings increase. The only configuration that consistently delivers a high frame rate is 1080p Low. The Medium preset at 1080p is the only other option that approaches a playable level, though its minimum FPS of 59 is borderline. All other combinations fall below 60 FPS, with the 4K and Ultra settings resulting in frame rates that are too low for a competitive multiplayer environment. The data shows that this combo is only suitable for 1080p gaming at the lowest presets.