Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a strong performance profile in Fivem, placing in the 92nd percentile of tested configurations. The data shows a system that scales predictably across resolutions, with the CPU providing ample headroom for the GPU to operate at its full potential. This analysis breaks down the measured results, component roles, and optimal settings based solely on the provided benchmark data.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 298th out of 3,707 tested combinations, placing it in the top 8% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 51,947. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX by 0.2% and the AMD EPYC 8124P by 0.3%, but leads the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0.4% and the Intel Core i7-14700 by 0.7%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance position relative to its closest competitors?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247. It is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 4080 SUPER, but trails the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1%, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.6%, and the AMD Radeon 8060S by 2.7%.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo, and at what settings?

A: The highest average FPS in the measured data is 306, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: At 4K resolution, what is the difference between Low and Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset delivers an average of 122 FPS, while the Ultra preset delivers 60 FPS. This represents a 62 FPS difference between the two extremes.

Q: Does the data include any minimum FPS values for the High or Ultra presets?

A: No, the measured data only provides minimum and maximum FPS values for the Medium preset at each resolution. For High and Ultra presets, only average FPS is available.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 serves as the primary rendering engine in this combination, and its specifications align with the measured frame rates. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. This capacity is sufficient for the visual demands of Fivem at high resolutions, with the data showing playable frame rates even at 4K.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 2205 MHz and boost of 2505 MHz, contribute to its compute performance. The shading units (9,728) and RT cores (76) handle the game's graphical workloads, while the 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides raw processing capability. The data reflects this power: at 3840x2160 with High settings, the combo averages 77 FPS, and at 2560x1440 with High settings, it reaches 138 FPS.

The RTX 4080's benchmark results show a percentile ranking of 86 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, is essentially tied with a 0.1% delta, indicating the 4080 holds its own against the newer variant. The GPU's 5 nm process node and 45,900 million transistors underscore its architectural efficiency, which is evident in the FPS scaling from 60 FPS at 4K Ultra to 306 FPS at 1080p Low.

The memory subsystem plays a critical role in this game's results. With 16 GB of VRAM, the RTX 4080 avoids capacity bottlenecks, even at 4K Ultra settings where the average FPS drops to 60. The 716.8 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and geometry data are fed to the processor without causing stutters, as evidenced by the consistent frame times in the Medium preset's min/max FPS data (82-110 FPS at 4K).

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X provides the processing foundation for this combo, with 16 cores and 32 threads operating from a 3.40 GHz base clock to a 4.90 GHz boost clock. This Zen 3 architecture, built on a 7 nm process, delivers strong multi-threaded performance that supports the game's simulation and physics workloads. The CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache is particularly relevant for Fivem's multiplayer environment, where numerous entities and scripts require rapid data access.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the 5950X shows its strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017 and Geekbench multicore score of 15,233 indicate robust parallel processing capability. The PassMark multithread score of 45,424 further confirms this, with the CPU achieving a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3,470 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,614, which matters for Fivem's primary game thread.

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores show a tight cluster. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (avgScore 52,073) is only 0.2% ahead, while the Intel Core i9-13900F (avgScore 51,730) is 0.4% behind. This indicates the 5950X competes directly with modern processors, despite being from an earlier generation. The 105W TDP and dual-channel DDR4 memory support (51.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide sufficient memory throughput for the game's demands.

The data suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios. At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 306 FPS, which is likely near the game's engine limit or the GPU's output ceiling. The CPU's ability to feed the GPU is demonstrated by the scaling from 1080p to 1440p: at High settings, FPS drops from 210 to 138, a 34% reduction that aligns with the pixel count increase, indicating the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 298 out of 3,707 places this system in the top 8% of all tested configurations for Fivem. This ranking reflects the synergy between the Ryzen 9 5950X and RTX 4080, which together deliver high frame rates across all measured settings. The percentileVsAllCpus of 91 and percentileVsAllGpus of 86 indicate that both components are individually in the upper echelon, and their combination results in a top-tier gaming experience.

Compared to other combinations in the database, this setup excels at high refresh rate gaming. At 2560x1440, the average FPS exceeds 138 on High settings and reaches 219 on Low, making it suitable for 144Hz monitors. Even at 4K, the combo maintains playable frame rates, with 77 FPS on High and 96 FPS on Medium. These results place it well above the median combo, which would struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 4K High in Fivem.

The ranking is particularly notable given the CPU's age. The Ryzen 9 5950X was released in November 2020, yet it still competes with newer processors in benchmark scores. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Core i7-14700, both of which are newer parts, yet the 5950X holds its own with deltas under 1%. This suggests that Fivem's performance is more dependent on the GPU than the CPU, allowing the 5950X to remain relevant.

The RTX 4080's ranking (86th percentile) is slightly lower than the CPU's (91st percentile), but its performance in Fivem is exceptional. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the RTX 4080 SUPER, are within 2.7% in benchmark scores, indicating a tight competition. In actual Fivem gameplay, the 4080's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth provide a substantial advantage over cards with less memory, particularly at 4K where the High preset uses significant VRAM.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 210 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate monitor. The Low preset pushes this to 306 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss may not justify the increase. The Medium preset at 263 FPS offers a balanced compromise, with the measured min FPS of 223 ensuring smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves 138 FPS, which is ideal for 144Hz displays. The Ultra preset drops to 107 FPS, still playable but less responsive. For competitive play, the Medium preset at 173 FPS (with a min of 147) offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. The Low preset at 219 FPS is available for those prioritizing maximum frame rates.

For 3840x2160, the data shows that the High preset at 77 FPS is the sweet spot for visual quality and smoothness. The Medium preset at 96 FPS (min 82, max 110) provides a better frame rate with a minor reduction in visual fidelity, making it the recommended choice for 60Hz monitors with some headroom. The Ultra preset at 60 FPS is playable but leaves no room for frame drops, while the Low preset at 122 FPS sacrifices too much visual quality for the resolution.

The Medium preset appears to be the most consistent option across all resolutions, as it is the only preset with min/max FPS data. At 1080p, the min of 223 FPS ensures no noticeable stutters; at 1440p, the min of 147 FPS maintains smoothness; and at 4K, the min of 82 FPS keeps gameplay fluid. This consistency makes Medium the safest recommendation for users who cannot tolerate frame drops.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 306 (Low) to 163 (Ultra). The High preset achieves 210 FPS, while Medium reaches 263 FPS with a min of 223 and max of 302. These numbers indicate that the combo is capable of driving high refresh rates at 1080p, with even Ultra settings exceeding 144 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the FPS drops are significant but expected. The Low preset averages 219 FPS, a 28% reduction from 1080p Low. High settings average 138 FPS, which is a 34% drop from 1080p High. Medium averages 173 FPS (min 147, max 199), and Ultra averages 107 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p suggests the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor, as the FPS reduction is close to the pixel count increase (1.78x).

At 3840x2160, the performance is still respectable but shows the GPU's limits. Low settings average 122 FPS, which is a 44% drop from 1080p Low. High settings average 77 FPS, a 63% drop from 1080p High. Medium averages 96 FPS (min 82, max 110), and Ultra averages 60 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 60 FPS is exactly at the threshold for smooth gameplay, but the absence of min/max data for this preset suggests potential variability.

The Medium preset at 4K provides the most complete data set, with a narrow range of 82-110 FPS. This 28 FPS spread indicates stable performance, which is crucial for a smooth experience. In contrast, the High and Ultra presets at 4K only show average FPS, making it impossible to assess frame time consistency. The data suggests that Medium is the "safe" choice for 4K, offering both good performance and predictable frame delivery.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component in this system. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 210 at 1080p to 138 at 1440p (a 34% decrease) and then to 77 at 4K (a 44% decrease from 1440p). The pixel count increases by 1.78x from 1080p to 1440p and by 2.25x from 1440p to 4K. The FPS drops are smaller than the pixel count increases, indicating that the GPU is not fully saturated at lower resolutions.

At Low settings, the scaling is more linear: 306 FPS at 1080p, 219 FPS at 1440p, and 122 FPS at 4K. This represents a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 44% drop from 1440p to 4K. The fact that Low settings show a smaller percentage drop than High settings suggests that at Low settings, the CPU or game engine becomes a limiting factor at 1080p, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential.

The Ultra preset shows the steepest scaling curve: 163 FPS at 1080p, 107 FPS at 1440p, and 60 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 44% drop from 1440p to 4K. The consistent percentage drops across presets indicate that the GPU is the primary scaling factor, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom even at 1080p Ultra.

At 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is 62 FPS (122 vs 60). This wide gap indicates that the GPU's workload increases significantly with graphical fidelity, and the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to handle the data. The 4K Medium result of 96 FPS (with a min of 82) suggests that the combo can maintain high frame rates at 4K if the user is willing to compromise on settings, with the data showing a clear trade-off between visual quality and performance.