Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination delivers a wide spread of frame rates in Fivem, ranging from 59 FPS at 4K Ultra to 311 FPS at 1080p Low. The benchmark results indicate that the choice of settings preset is critical to balancing visual fidelity with smoothness, particularly given the game's multiplayer nature where frame time consistency matters.

Settings Recommendations

For a 60 Hz display at 3840x2160, the High preset is the optimal choice. It delivers an average of 76 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and 17 FPS higher than the 59 FPS average of the Ultra preset. The Medium preset at 4K yields 95 FPS, which is smoother but comes at a noticeable visual cost compared to High. Given that the Ultra preset drops below 60 FPS, it is not recommended for standard 60 Hz monitors, though it could be used with variable refresh rate displays that handle lower frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is again the best balance. It produces 138 FPS average, which is well-suited for 120 Hz or 144 Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 107 FPS is also viable for 100 Hz+ displays, but the 31 FPS jump from Ultra to High is substantial. The Medium preset at 172 FPS is excessive for most 144 Hz panels and introduces unnecessary GPU load without proportional visual gains. The Low preset at 218 FPS is only relevant for competitive play at 240 Hz.

For 1920x1080, the High preset at 209 FPS is the recommended choice. It provides a smooth experience on 144 Hz and 165 Hz monitors while maintaining good image quality. The Ultra preset at 162 FPS is still very smooth for 144 Hz, but the High preset offers a better performance-to-visual ratio. The Medium preset at 261 FPS and Low at 311 FPS are overkill for typical displays and should only be used when targeting 360 Hz or higher refresh rates, or when the user prioritizes maximum frame rate above all else.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 256-bit bus, providing 736.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This ample VRAM capacity and bandwidth are well-suited for Fivem, which can be demanding on memory when loading high-resolution textures in multiplayer sessions. The GPU's 10240 shading units and 80 RT cores are not heavily taxed by Fivem's rendering, as the game does not leverage ray tracing extensively.

The RTX 4080 SUPER's clock speeds are 2295 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost. The boost clock is consistently achieved across all tested resolutions, as the GPU's 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler allow sustained performance. The benchmark results show that the GPU is the primary performance driver at 4K, where frame rates scale linearly with settings: 59 FPS at Ultra, 76 FPS at High, 95 FPS at Medium, and 121 FPS at Low. This pattern indicates that the GPU is fully utilized at 4K, with each settings reduction yielding a clear FPS increase.

At 1440p and 1080p, the GPU's role shifts. The 218 FPS at 1440p Low and 311 FPS at 1080p Low suggest that the GPU is still capable of very high frame rates, but the CPU begins to impose limits at lower resolutions and settings. The RTX 4080 SUPER's nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which has an average score of 54247, a delta of only -0.1%. This means the RTX 4080 SUPER is essentially performance-equivalent to the RTX 4080 in raw compute, and the data shows that Fivem performance aligns with this expectation.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming on this combo?

A: The High preset at 3840x2160 produces 76 FPS average, which is the best balance of visual quality and smoothness for 60 Hz displays. The Ultra preset drops to 59 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target.

Q: Can this combo achieve 144 FPS at 1440p?

A: Yes. The High preset at 2560x1440 delivers 138 FPS, very close to the 144 FPS target. The Medium preset reaches 172 FPS, which exceeds 144 FPS, and the Low preset hits 218 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the RTX 4080 in Fivem?

A: The benchmark data does not include direct Fivem comparisons, but the GPU's synthetic average benchmark score is 54209, while the RTX 4080 scores 54247, a delta of -0.1%. This negligible difference suggests nearly identical real-world performance in Fivem.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5800XT a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU becomes a limiting factor at 1080p Low, where FPS reaches 311. This is very high, but the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with a 4.80 GHz boost clock are capable of driving these frame rates. The bottleneck is not severe, as the GPU still achieves over 300 FPS.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 307 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the top 8.3% of all configurations tested.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM get fully utilized at 4K Ultra?

A: The measured FPS data does not include VRAM usage figures. However, the 16 GB GDDR6X buffer with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for Fivem at any settings, as the game does not typically exceed 8-10 GB even at 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination ranks 307 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the 91.7th percentile among all configurations tested, meaning it outperforms approximately 3400 other combinations. The rank is strong but not top-tier, reflecting that Fivem can be CPU-bound in certain scenarios, and the Ryzen 7 5800XT, while capable, is not the fastest CPU available for this game.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, which has an average benchmark score of 29868 (delta 0%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29955 (delta -0.3%). These mobile-class processors are very close in synthetic performance, but the 5800XT's desktop Zen 3 architecture with 32 MB of shared L3 cache provides strong gaming performance. The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 4080, is essentially identical in performance, meaning the combo's rank is primarily determined by the CPU's standing among tested processors.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the nature of the performance bottleneck. At Low settings, FPS drops from 311 at 1080p to 218 at 1440p (a 30% reduction) and then to 121 at 4K (a 61% reduction from 1080p). This steep drop at 4K indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the pixel count increases by a factor of 4 from 1080p to 4K.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is more linear: 162 FPS at 1080p, 107 FPS at 1440p (34% drop), and 59 FPS at 4K (64% drop from 1080p). The consistent pattern across all settings presets shows that the GPU is the dominant bottleneck at 4K, while the CPU plays a larger role at 1080p. The fact that 1080p Low achieves 311 FPS suggests the CPU is capable of driving very high frame rates, but the 4K Ultra figure of 59 FPS is purely GPU-limited. The Medium preset provides the only data points with minimum and maximum FPS: at 1080p, the range is 222-301 FPS; at 1440p, 146-198 FPS; at 4K, 81-110 FPS. These ranges show that frame time consistency is good, with the minimums staying within 71-74% of the maximums.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the Ultra preset yields 59 FPS average. The High preset improves to 76 FPS, a 29% increase. Medium delivers 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS. Low settings produce 121 FPS average, the highest at this resolution.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the Ultra preset averages 107 FPS. High settings reach 138 FPS, a 29% improvement over Ultra. Medium achieves 172 FPS, with a minimum of 146 FPS and maximum of 198 FPS. Low settings hit 218 FPS, the highest at 1440p.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the Ultra preset averages 162 FPS. High settings deliver 209 FPS, a 29% increase over Ultra. Medium reaches 261 FPS, with a minimum of 222 FPS and maximum of 301 FPS. Low settings achieve 311 FPS, the highest frame rate recorded across all tested configurations.

The pattern across all resolutions is consistent: the jump from Ultra to High yields approximately 29% more FPS, while the jump from Medium to Low yields about 19-27% more FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, making it unsuitable for standard 60 Hz displays.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer) on a 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU's synthetic benchmarks show strong single-threaded performance: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 959. Multi-threaded performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 and a PassMark multithread score of 28053.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is most apparent at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 311 FPS, which is primarily CPU-limited. The 8 cores and 16 threads are well-utilized by Fivem's multiplayer server logic and physics calculations. The 4.80 GHz boost clock helps maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, and the 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency when accessing frequently used game data.

The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (avg score 29868, delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (avg score 29713, delta 0.6%). The 5800XT's 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it is a strong performer, but not the absolute fastest. The benchmark results show that the CPU is capable of supporting the RTX 4080 SUPER at 1440p and 4K without significant bottlenecking, as evidenced by the linear scaling of FPS with resolution changes. At 1080p, the CPU does limit maximum frame rates, but the 311 FPS ceiling is still very high and unlikely to be a practical concern for most users.