Fivem

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER lands at rank 1098 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. That places this configuration in the 61st percentile of all tested combinations, meaning roughly 61% of tested combos perform better in this multiplayer title. This is a mid-pack result for a pairing that combines an 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a GPU that sits at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards.

The ranking suggests this combo is neither a standout performer nor a laggard in Fivem. The CPU, which holds the 83rd percentile among all processors, clearly outranks the GPU in relative standing. This disparity hints that the RTX 2070 SUPER may be the limiting factor in achieving higher frame rates, particularly at demanding settings. The combo's position near the middle of the distribution indicates that many other pairings — likely those with newer GPUs or higher-end cards — can push Fivem to higher performance levels.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock runs at 1605 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These specifications place the GPU at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 22206.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes evident when examining the measured FPS across settings. At 1080p, the RTX 2070 SUPER delivers 177.7 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 86.4 FPS on Ultra — a reduction of over half. The 8 GB VRAM capacity appears sufficient for this title, as even the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K doesn't show signs of memory-related stuttering in the data, though the average FPS of 28.8 at that resolution indicates the GPU is heavily taxed.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A400 (0.5% lower average score), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (0.9% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (2.5% higher). These close margins suggest the RTX 2070 SUPER sits in a competitive performance band, with small differences separating it from both older and newer cards.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations in Fivem?

A: This combo ranks 1098 out of 1792 tested, placing it in the 61st percentile. It outperforms roughly 39% of tested combos while trailing the majority, indicating a solid but not exceptional standing.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: At 1080p, the combo achieves playable frame rates across all settings, with Low hitting 177.7 FPS and Ultra reaching 86.4 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 57 FPS, while 4K Ultra falls to 28.8 FPS, suggesting 1080p is the sweet spot for this pairing.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X3D has an average benchmark score of 26574, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD EPYC 8024P and Intel Core i9-11900K, and 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7600. It trails the Intel Core i9-12900HK by 0.4%.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more likely to limit performance in Fivem?

A: The data shows the CPU ranks at the 83rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile. This gap suggests the RTX 2070 SUPER is more likely to be the bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions and settings where GPU load increases.

Q: How much does the RTX 2070 SUPER differ from its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 22206. The NVIDIA RTX A400 scores 0.5% lower, the GTX TITAN Z scores 0.9% higher, and the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 2.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 outperforms it by 2.5%.

Q: What settings provide the largest FPS jump at 1080p?

A: Moving from Ultra to High at 1080p increases FPS from 86.4 to 108.4, a gain of 22 FPS. Dropping from High to Medium adds another 27 FPS (135.4), and Low pushes to 177.7 FPS, showing diminishing returns at the highest presets.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern for optimal settings. At 1080p, the High preset delivers 108.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and represents a balanced choice. This preset offers a 25.5% improvement over Ultra's 86.4 FPS while maintaining visual quality. For players prioritizing frame rate, Medium at 135.4 FPS provides a substantial boost with only a moderate visual compromise.

At 1440p, High produces 70 FPS, which remains playable for most users, while Medium hits 90.5 FPS for those seeking smoother motion. Ultra at 1440p drops to 57 FPS, which may be acceptable for some but risks feeling less fluid in a multiplayer environment. The data suggests that High or Medium at 1440p offers the best balance for this resolution.

At 4K, only Low settings achieve a playable 65.7 FPS, while Medium drops to 48.2 FPS and High falls to 42.6 FPS. Ultra at 4K becomes nearly unplayable at 28.8 FPS. Given these numbers, 4K gaming with this combo requires significant settings compromises, making it a less attractive option compared to lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo's performance spans a wide range. Low settings produce an average of 177.7 FPS, representing the highest measured value across all resolutions and settings. Medium achieves 135.4 FPS, High reaches 108.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 86.4 FPS. This spread of 91.3 FPS between Low and Ultra demonstrates how significantly settings impact performance at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages decrease proportionally. Low delivers 112.3 FPS, Medium hits 90.5 FPS, High achieves 70 FPS, and Ultra falls to 57 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 55.3 FPS, showing that resolution constraints begin to flatten the settings curve.

At 3840x2160, performance drops substantially. Low manages 65.7 FPS, Medium reaches 48.2 FPS, High produces 42.6 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra here is 36.9 FPS, indicating that at 4K, even the lowest settings struggle to maintain high frame rates. The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in settings costs roughly 20-30% performance, with the penalty growing at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Its 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a distinctive characteristic of this Zen 3 (Vermeer) architecture chip, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. The CPU's average benchmark score of 26574 places it at the 83rd percentile among all processors, with a multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 24063 and a single-thread score of 3397.

In Fivem, the CPU's substantial thread count and large cache likely contribute to maintaining high frame rates at 1080p, where the GPU has less work per frame. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 177.7 FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently. However, the CPU's nearest rivals — including the Intel Core i9-11900K and AMD Ryzen 5 7600 — post nearly identical average scores, indicating that this generation of processors offers similar gaming performance headroom.

The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by Geekbench at 2116, is adequate for Fivem's likely multi-player workloads, which often involve complex scripting and physics calculations. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7299 and max-thread score of 7285 demonstrate strong multi-core capability that can handle concurrent game logic and rendering tasks.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component in this combo. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 177.7 FPS, but at 1440p Low, it drops to 112.3 FPS — a reduction of 36.8%. Moving to 4K Low, performance falls to 65.7 FPS, representing a 63.0% drop from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern is typical of GPU-bound scenarios, where pixel count increases directly impact frame rates.

Comparing settings at each resolution shows how the bottleneck shifts. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 91.3 FPS, suggesting the GPU has headroom at lower settings. At 1440p, this difference narrows to 55.3 FPS, and at 4K, it shrinks to 36.9 FPS. This convergence indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and settings adjustments have less impact on overall performance.

The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance allows the GPU to stretch its legs, but at 4K, the RTX 2070 SUPER's compute capabilities — 9.062 TFLOPS FP32 and 113.3 GPixel/s pixel rate — become the limiting factor. Users seeking higher frame rates at 4K would need to either reduce settings to Low or consider a GPU upgrade, as the CPU's 83rd percentile standing suggests it has more to give.