Control

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT pairing delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, but the data shows a clear ceiling at 4K where the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture, provide ample processing headroom for this title, while the RX 6700 XT’s RDNA 2.0 architecture handles the graphical load effectively up to certain limits. This analysis breaks down exactly how the measured frame rates behave across resolutions and settings, and where this combo stands relative to other tested configurations.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Cezanne) using a 7 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. Its benchmark scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance: the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 20755, while the single-core score is 2930. The Geekbench multicore score is 8970, with a single-core score of 2016. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 6629, and the max-thread score is 6627, showing consistent scaling across all threads.

In Control, the CPU’s role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The data suggests the 5700G is not the bottleneck at any measured resolution. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 141.8 FPS, which is far above the 60 FPS target, indicating the CPU can push high frame rates without breaking a sweat. However, the delta between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is significant: from 141.8 FPS down to 81.1 FPS, a drop of 60.7 FPS. This indicates that while the CPU is capable, the workload shifts heavily to the GPU as settings increase. The 5700G’s single-thread performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2930, is adequate for this game’s engine, but the real limiter at higher settings is clearly the graphics card.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25626 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (avg score 25706, deltaPct -0.3), Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25532, 0.4), and Intel Core 5 210H (25490, 0.5). These deltas are minimal, meaning the 5700G performs within 0.6% of these alternatives in synthetic tests. For Control, this means the CPU is a reliable mid-range performer that won’t hold back the GPU in most scenarios, but the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences across settings and resolutions.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Control, and at what settings?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 141.8, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only configuration that exceeds 140 FPS, and it demonstrates the CPU’s ability to handle high frame rates when the GPU load is minimized.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 41.9. This is below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the RX 6700 XT is heavily strained at this resolution and settings combination. Even at High settings, 4K only yields 46 FPS, so this resolution is not ideal for smooth gameplay.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the FPS ranges from 106.1 (Low) to 61.3 (Ultra). The gap between Low and Ultra is 44.8 FPS, which is a substantial drop. This suggests the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU’s performance is unlikely to change with settings, while the GPU’s workload increases significantly with higher presets.

*Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested configurations in Control?*

A: The combo ranks 867 out of 1636 tested combos in the game. This places it in the upper-middle portion of the database, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is far from the bottom and capable of delivering playable frame rates at lower resolutions.

Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (33493) and 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 (33294). However, it scores 1% lower than both the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (34050) and AMD Radeon RX 480 (34059), showing that synthetic scores don’t always translate directly to game performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking compared to all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25626. This indicates it outperforms the majority of processors, though its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, is only 0.3% behind in average score, showing close competition in this performance tier.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which points directly to the GPU as the limiting component. At 1080p, the combo achieves 141.8 FPS on Low, 102.7 on Medium, 92.8 on High, and 81.1 on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, these numbers drop to 106.1, 75.2, 65.7, and 61.3 respectively. At 4K, the figures fall further to 72.8, 52.4, 46, and 41.9.

The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial. For Low settings, the FPS goes from 141.8 to 72.8, a reduction of 48.7%. For Medium, it drops from 102.7 to 52.4, a 49% reduction. High settings fall from 92.8 to 46, a 50.4% drop, and Ultra goes from 81.1 to 41.9, a 48.3% decrease. These consistent reductions of roughly half the FPS when quadrupling the pixel count (1080p to 4K has four times the pixels) indicate that the GPU is being pushed to its limits. The CPU, with its 16 threads and high boost clock, is unlikely to be the cause of these drops, as the workload at 4K is overwhelmingly GPU-bound.

The scaling pattern also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings shrinks as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 60.7 FPS. At 1440p, it’s 44.8 FPS. At 4K, it narrows to 30.9 FPS. This is classic GPU-bound behavior: at lower resolutions, the GPU has more headroom to respond to settings changes, but at 4K, it’s already saturated, so the relative impact of settings is smaller. The data confirms that for this combo, 1080p is the sweet spot for high refresh rates, 1440p is viable for 60 FPS on most settings, and 4K is only playable on Low settings, where it hits 72.8 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks 867 out of 1636 tested combinations in Control. This places it in the 53rd percentile of all combos, meaning it performs better than just over half of the configurations tested. The rank reflects the overall average FPS across all measured scenarios, weighted by the game’s demands.

Given the GPU’s 77th percentile ranking among all GPUs and the CPU’s 83rd percentile, one might expect a higher combo rank. However, the game’s specific engine and its heavy reliance on GPU features like ray tracing and particle effects can skew results. The RX 6700 XT’s nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the RX 6800 (0.7% higher avg score), HD 7950 (-1%), RX 480 (-1%), and RTX A5000 (1.3%). These small deltas suggest the GPU is well-matched with its peers, but the combo rank indicates that other pairings with stronger CPUs or GPUs can achieve higher frame rates in Control specifically.

The rank of 867 out of 1636 means that this combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is also not a weak one. For a game like Control, which is known for its demanding visual effects, this pairing provides a balanced experience at 1080p and 1440p, but it falls short at 4K. The data shows that the combo’s performance is consistent with its hardware tier, and the rank reflects that it sits in the middle of the pack, offering a reasonable experience for most gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p gameplay.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS rows provide clear guidance on which settings preset to use based on resolution and target frame rate. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 81.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and offers the best visual quality. However, if the goal is maximum smoothness on a high-refresh-rate monitor, the Low preset achieves 141.8 FPS, which is nearly double the Ultra frame rate. The Medium preset at 102.7 FPS and High at 92.8 FPS both offer solid options, with High providing a good balance between visual fidelity and performance.

At 1440p, the Ultra preset drops to 61.3 FPS, which is just above 60 FPS and playable, but the High preset at 65.7 FPS offers a slightly better margin. The Low preset at 106.1 FPS is the only one that provides a significant headroom above 60 FPS, making it the best choice for competitive or fast-paced play. The Medium preset at 75.2 FPS is a reasonable middle ground for those who want better visuals without sacrificing too much performance.

At 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset achieves 72.8 FPS, which is the only setting that stays above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 52.4 FPS, High at 46 FPS, and Ultra at 41.9 FPS all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, making them less ideal for smooth gameplay. For 4K, the data strongly recommends the Low preset if frame rate is a priority, as it provides the only playable experience. If visual fidelity is more important, the Medium preset at 52.4 FPS may be acceptable on a VRR display, but the frame rate will be noticeably lower.

Overall, the best experience per the measured rows depends on the user’s priority. For a balanced approach, High settings at 1080p (92.8 FPS) or 1440p (65.7 FPS) offer a good mix of quality and performance. For maximum frame rates, Low settings at any resolution provide the highest FPS, with 141.8 FPS at 1080p being the peak.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 141.8, which is the highest recorded across all configurations. Medium settings drop this to 102.7 FPS, while High settings yield 92.8 FPS. Ultra settings pull the frame rate down to 81.1 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 60.7 FPS, showing significant scaling with settings. All settings at 1080p exceed 60 FPS, making this resolution the most versatile for the combo.

At 2560x1440, performance remains solid but with more variation. Low settings achieve 106.1 FPS, which is still well above 60 FPS. Medium settings produce 75.2 FPS, and High settings reach 65.7 FPS. Ultra settings bring the frame rate down to 61.3 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS mark. The spread from Low to Ultra is 44.8 FPS, indicating that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor at this resolution. All settings at 1440p remain playable, though Ultra is close to the edge.

At 3840x2160, performance drops significantly. Low settings are the only preset that exceeds 60 FPS, achieving 72.8 FPS. Medium settings fall to 52.4 FPS, High settings to 46 FPS, and Ultra settings to 41.9 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 30.9 FPS, which is the narrowest of all resolutions, confirming that the GPU is heavily saturated at 4K. Only Low settings provide a comfortable frame rate, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, making them less suitable for smooth gameplay. The data clearly shows that 4K is the weakest scenario for this combo, and users should either lower settings to Low or consider a different resolution for the best experience.