Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers a robust Fivem experience, with benchmark data showing a strong emphasis on high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K remains viable for high-fidelity play. The 8-core, 16-thread processor provides solid multi-threaded headroom for the multiplayer environment, and the 12 GB VRAM buffer on the graphics card ensures texture-heavy sessions remain stable. Measured results indicate that this pairing is well-balanced, with the CPU’s 84th percentile standing and the GPU’s identical 84th percentile positioning creating a synergistic platform for the game’s demands.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 307th out of 1792 tested configurations, placing it in the top 17% of all recorded system pairings for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in general benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 27220, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i9-9900K, 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-12700H, and 1.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340.

Q: What is the peak average frame rate achievable in Fivem with this hardware?

A: The highest measured average is 287.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 resolution, the system delivers an average of 65.1 FPS on High settings and 52.4 FPS on Ultra settings, indicating playable performance for most users.

Q: How much video memory does the GPU feature, and what type is it?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER comes with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the processor’s boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this specific hardware pairing at rank 307 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, which is a strong result considering the breadth of systems cataloged. This percentile placement indicates that the combination of the Ryzen 7 5700 and RTX 4070 SUPER sits comfortably above the median performer, offering a high-quality experience without requiring the absolute top-tier components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27220 positions it in the 84th percentile of all processors, and the GPU’s average score of 42576 also places it in the 84th percentile of all graphics cards. This alignment suggests that neither component is likely to be a significant bottleneck in Fivem, allowing for a balanced workload distribution.

When examining the CPU’s nearest rivals, the performance gap is minimal. The Ryzen 7 5700 trails the Intel Core i9-9900K by just 0.7% in average score, while it leads the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 by 1.2%. These small deltas indicate that the platform choice has a negligible impact on overall potential performance in this title. Similarly, the GPU’s nearest rivals show a competitive landscape, with the RTX 4070 SUPER performing 0.2% behind the NVIDIA RTX A6000 and 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla M40. The consistency in these scores reinforces that the combo’s rank is driven more by the balance of the two components than by any single piece of hardware excelling beyond its class.

The rank of 307 also suggests that while there are 306 faster combinations, the vast majority of systems in the database (1485 combos) will deliver lower performance. For a multiplayer title like Fivem, where frame consistency and responsiveness are crucial, this ranking implies that the system is well-equipped to handle congested areas or high player counts without falling into unplayable territory. The data shows a clear tier of performance that this combo achieves, making it a reliable choice for users seeking a high-refresh-rate experience.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER plays a pivotal role in dictating the visual fidelity and frame pacing in Fivem. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is a substantial asset, especially for a multiplayer modding platform where custom assets and high-resolution textures are common. The 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming is efficient, reducing the likelihood of hitches when loading new areas or encountering detailed player models. The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process, provides a strong foundation with 7168 shading units and 224 texture mapping units.

Clock speeds are also a key factor in its performance. The GPU has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. These high frequencies allow the card to maintain high throughput in scenarios where the game is not heavily CPU-bound. The pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s are indicative of its capacity to handle the rendering workload at various resolutions. However, the measured FPS data across different settings reveals that the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions, particularly at 4K.

At 3840x2160, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is stark, with average FPS dropping from 102.7 to 52.4. This 50.3 FPS swing demonstrates how the GPU’s compute resources are taxed by the increased pixel count and shading complexity. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient to drive playable frame rates at 4K on High settings, but the data shows that Ultra settings will push it to the edge of smoothness. In contrast, at 1920x1080, the GPU has ample headroom, as evidenced by the 287.5 FPS average on Low settings, which is likely limited by the CPU’s single-thread performance rather than the GPU’s capabilities.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how the combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system exhibits exceptional performance, with average FPS ranging from 141.2 on Ultra to 287.5 on Low. The jump between settings is consistent: Medium delivers 229.8 FPS and High delivers 181.3 FPS. This indicates that the CPU and GPU have significant headroom at this resolution, allowing for high refresh rate monitors to be fully utilized. The gap between Low and Ultra is 146.3 FPS, which suggests that users can sacrifice a significant amount of visual quality to achieve near-maximum refresh rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. The average FPS at Low is 192.8, which is a 32.9% reduction compared to the 1080p Low result. Medium settings yield 151 FPS, High yields 117.9 FPS, and Ultra drops to 94 FPS. This scaling shows that 1440p is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate gaming, with High settings still delivering over 100 FPS average. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 98.8 FPS, indicating that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor in performance.

At 3840x2160, the system transitions from a high-refresh-rate powerhouse to a solid 60 FPS performer. The average FPS on Low is 102.7, which is playable but far from the triple-digit scores seen at lower resolutions. Medium settings drop to 85.8 FPS, while High settings manage 65.1 FPS. Ultra settings bring the average down to 52.4 FPS, which may be below the threshold for competitive play but remains acceptable for immersive single-player or casual sessions. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a 50.3 FPS drop, showing that the GPU is heavily loaded at this resolution.

The data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p, the combo is CPU-limited in many scenarios, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The 1440p results represent the best balance, with the system capable of delivering high visual fidelity alongside strong frame rates. For users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, the 1440p High setting at 117.9 FPS provides a near-ideal experience, while those with 240Hz panels may prefer 1080p Medium at 229.8 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS breakdown, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p 240Hz monitor, the High preset at 181.3 FPS offers a strong balance of visual quality and speed, though Medium at 229.8 FPS is better suited to fully saturate the display’s capabilities. The Low preset at 287.5 FPS exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors, making it a viable option for competitive players who prioritize response time over aesthetics.

For 1440p, the High preset at 117.9 FPS is the recommended starting point for most users. It delivers a smooth experience on 120Hz displays and offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium. Those with 144Hz monitors can consider Medium at 151 FPS to ensure frame rates remain above the refresh threshold, while Ultra at 94 FPS is acceptable for users who value image quality over raw speed and have adaptive sync technology.

At 4K, the choice is more constrained. The High preset at 65.1 FPS is the best option for a balanced experience, providing a stable frame rate that is comfortable on 60Hz displays. Medium at 85.8 FPS is a viable alternative for users who want to maintain higher frame rates, though the visual trade-off is noticeable. Ultra at 52.4 FPS should be reserved for scenarios where frame rate is less critical, such as taking screenshots or exploring static environments. Low at 102.7 FPS is a practical choice for those who prioritize fluidity over all else, even at this high resolution.

In summary, the data indicates that the High preset offers the best overall experience across all resolutions, balancing visual fidelity with frame rate. However, the specific choice should be guided by the refresh rate of the display and the user’s tolerance for visual compromises. The measured results show that this combo has the versatility to adapt to a wide range of preferences, from esports-level responsiveness to cinematic 4K visuals.