Counter-Strike 2

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination lands in the upper tier of tested configurations for Counter-Strike 2, securing rank 628 out of 3719 total combos. This placement puts it in the top 17% of all systems tested, a strong showing that reflects a balanced pairing capable of delivering high frame rates across all settings. The data indicates this combo is well-suited for competitive play, where high and consistent FPS is paramount.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 628 out of 3719 places this pairing firmly in the top percentile of tested systems. This is not a marginal placement; it shows that the combination of the Ryzen 7 5700 and RTX 4070 SUPER is well above the median performer. For context, the CPU itself holds a percentileVsAllCpus of 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU is even stronger, with a percentileVsAllGpus of 83. This synergy is key: a top-tier GPU paired with an above-average CPU creates a system that avoids significant bottlenecks in most scenarios.

The benchmark results confirm this. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25517 is almost identical to its nearest rivals, with deltaPct values hovering near zero. For instance, it is only 0.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and 0.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U. This suggests that the Ryzen 7 5700 is a very consistent performer, providing a stable foundation. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 43223 similarly places it in a tight competitive group, with a deltaPct of -1% compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. This data shows that while the individual components are not top-of-the-line, their combination is exceptionally effective for a game like Counter-Strike 2.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play at with this combo?

A: The data shows that at 1920x1080, the system achieves an average of 587 FPS on Low settings and 364 FPS on High settings. At 2560x1440, it still delivers a very playable 388 FPS on Low and 241 FPS on High. Even at 3840x2160, the average FPS remains above 100 on High settings, making 1440p the sweet spot for high refresh rate monitors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct competitors?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700’s average benchmark score of 25517 is within a 0.3% margin of its nearest rivals. It is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, and a mere 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U. This indicates that in terms of raw processing power, it is a perfectly standard performer in its class.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER a significant step up from other GPUs?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 43223 places it just 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, which is a notable result. It also outperforms the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 0.1%, showing that its performance is competitive with some very high-end hardware.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured FPS data shows an average of 241 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. This is an excellent result for competitive gaming, providing a smooth and responsive experience that is well above the 144Hz refresh rate that many gamers target.

Q: Does the system maintain high FPS even at 4K?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160, the average FPS is 135 on High settings and 180 on Medium settings. This means the combination is capable of 4K gaming at high refresh rates, though not at the extreme frame rates seen at lower resolutions.

Q: Which settings preset offers the highest performance?

A: The Low preset yields the highest average FPS at all resolutions, with a peak of 587 FPS at 1080p. For a balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset is also highly effective, providing an average of 487 FPS at 1080p and 323 FPS at 1440p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, which are the speeds that dictate its single-thread and multi-thread performance. In a game like Counter-Strike 2, which is known for being CPU-intensive, the processor's single-thread performance is crucial for maintaining high frame rates. The benchmark data supports this, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 901 and a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 2916, showing solid per-core capability.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is also robust, as evidenced by a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 20655 and a passmark_multithread score of 24303. While Counter-Strike 2 may not utilize all 16 threads to their maximum potential, having them available ensures that background tasks and the game's engine overhead do not become a bottleneck. The 16 MB of L3 cache is also a beneficial feature, as it allows for faster access to frequently used data, which can help reduce stuttering and improve frame time consistency. The CPU's performance percentile of 78 indicates it is a strong performer, and its 65W TDP suggests it is an efficient choice that won't demand excessive cooling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its maximum potential. With Low settings, the average FPS is a staggering 587. This is a performance level designed for high-refresh-rate esports monitors. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 487 FPS, with a minimum of 414 and a maximum of 561. High settings still deliver an impressive 364 FPS average. Even at Ultra settings, the system maintains an average of 283 FPS, which is more than enough for any competitive scenario.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent. The Low preset delivers an average of 388 FPS, keeping the experience fluid and responsive. The Medium preset provides a good balance, with an average of 323 FPS and a minimum of 274. High settings still allow for a very high 241 FPS average, which is ideal for 144Hz and 165Hz monitors. Ultra settings bring the average down to 187 FPS, but this is still well within the bounds of high-refresh-rate gaming.

The transition to 3840x2160 shows the system's capability in 4K. The Low preset yields an average of 217 FPS, which is remarkable for 4K resolution. Medium settings provide an average of 180 FPS, with a minimum of 153 and a maximum of 207, ensuring a smooth experience. High settings maintain an average of 135 FPS, which is playable for most users. Ultra settings are the most demanding, bringing the average down to 105 FPS, but this is still a solid result for a game that prioritizes frame rate over graphical fidelity.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K is a key indicator of where the bottleneck lies in this system. At 1080p with Low settings, the average FPS is 587. Dropping to 1440p, it falls to 388 FPS, and at 4K it hits 217 FPS. This represents a drop of 34% from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 44% drop from 1440p to 4K. This significant scaling with resolution suggests that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor as the pixel count increases.

However, the story is slightly different when looking at the High settings. At 1080p, the average is 364 FPS. At 1440p, it's 241 FPS, a drop of 34%. At 4K, it's 135 FPS, a 44% drop from 1440p. While the GPU is clearly being taxed more at higher resolutions, the fact that the 1080p and 1440p scores are so high indicates that the CPU is keeping up admirably. If the CPU were a severe bottleneck, we would see a smaller FPS difference between 1080p and 1440p, as the CPU would be limiting the frame rate in both cases. The data instead shows a more linear scaling with resolution, pointing to the GPU as the primary driver of performance differences across resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

For competitive play, where maximum frame rate is the priority, the Low preset is the clear choice. It delivers the highest average FPS at every resolution, peaking at 587 FPS at 1080p. This ensures the least input lag and the smoothest possible visual experience, giving players a significant advantage. The data shows that even at 4K, the Low preset achieves 217 FPS, making it a viable option for those who want the highest refresh rates possible.

For a balanced experience that maintains high frame rates while improving visual fidelity, the Medium preset is the best option. It provides a substantial increase in visual quality over Low while still delivering excellent performance. At 1440p, the Medium preset offers an average of 323 FPS, which is perfect for high-refresh-rate displays. The minimum FPS of 274 also shows that the system is capable of maintaining consistent performance, avoiding significant frame drops during intense firefights.

The High preset is recommended for users who want a more visually polished game without sacrificing too much performance. With an average of 241 FPS at 1440p and 364 FPS at 1080p, it is still an excellent choice for most gaming monitors. The Ultra preset is not recommended for competitive play, as the performance hit is significant, but the data shows it remains playable with an average of 283 FPS at 1080p. Ultimately, the best setting depends on the user's monitor refresh rate and personal preference for visual quality over raw performance.