Fivem

# Fivem Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a highly capable Fivem experience, with benchmark data showing a clear progression from playable 4K performance to exceptional 1080p frame rates. The measured results place this pairing at rank 1681 out of 3707 tested combos, indicating a solid mid-to-upper tier standing for this multiplayer title. The data reveals that Fivem scales predictably with resolution, and the system's strengths lie in delivering high refresh rate gameplay at 1440p and 1080p, while maintaining respectable 4K capability at medium settings.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a dramatic and consistent drop as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, which is typical for a GPU-bound title at higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 200 FPS, which drops to 132 FPS at 1440p and further to 73 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 45% reduction from 1440p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor as pixel count rises.

The High settings preset tells a similar story, with 126 FPS at 1080p, 83 FPS at 1440p, and 46 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings shows a 45% performance loss, which is nearly identical to the Low preset's scaling. This consistency suggests that the RX 6750 XT's rendering pipeline is handling the resolution increase in a predictable manner, with the GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth proving sufficient to avoid memory-related bottlenecks even at 4K.

At Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 158 FPS at 1080p to 104 FPS at 1440p, and then to 58 FPS at 4K. The 1440p to 4K drop here is 44%, again confirming the GPU-bound nature of higher resolutions. The Ultra preset shows the steepest scaling curve, with 98 FPS at 1080p dropping to 65 FPS at 1440p (a 34% loss) and then to 36 FPS at 4K (a 45% loss from 1440p). This pattern strongly indicates that while the CPU (Ryzen 5 7500F) can maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions, the RX 6750 XT's compute resources become the limiting factor as resolution increases.

The data reveals that 4K gaming at Ultra settings is not viable, with only 36 FPS average, while 4K at High settings produces a borderline playable 46 FPS. The sweet spot for 4K appears to be Medium settings, which delivers 58 FPS and includes measured minimums of 49 FPS and maximums of 66 FPS, suggesting reasonable frame time consistency. At 1440p, all presets except Ultra deliver smooth gameplay, with Low hitting 132 FPS, Medium at 104 FPS, and High at 83 FPS. The 1080p results are uniformly excellent, with even Ultra settings maintaining 98 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, based on the Navi 22 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, is clearly the dominant component in this pairing for Fivem's higher-resolution workloads. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, with a boost clock of 2600 MHz and a game clock of 2495 MHz. These specifications translate to a measured FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS, which is substantial for a card in this class.

The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In the context of Fivem's measured results, this memory configuration proves adequate across all tested resolutions, as evidenced by the consistent frame rate scaling without any anomalous drops that would indicate VRAM capacity or bandwidth limitations. The GPU's 40 ray tracing cores are present but appear irrelevant to Fivem's performance, as the game's workloads are predominantly rasterization-based.

The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its mid-range positioning. With a Passmark G3D score of 20700 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548, the RX 6750 XT sits at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 26011 places it in close competition with the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891, 0.5% slower), AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, 0.6% slower), AMD FirePro D700 (25842, 0.7% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25740, 1.1% slower). This indicates that while the card is not at the top of the performance hierarchy, it comfortably outperforms several older workstation and mobile solutions.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure that Fivem can utilize modern rendering paths. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU's 250 W TDP is well-utilized, with the card maintaining strong performance across all settings. The 4K Ultra result of 36 FPS represents the GPU's limit in this title, while the 1080p Low result of 200 FPS demonstrates headroom that is likely constrained by the CPU or game engine frame rate limits rather than GPU compute.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F plays a critical role in enabling the high frame rates seen at 1080p and 1440p, particularly at lower settings where the GPU is less burdened. This 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) features a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for Fivem's multiplayer workloads, which often involve significant physics and network processing.

The CPU's benchmark results show strong single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. The Cinebench R23 scores of 3218 single-core and 22799 multi-core indicate excellent per-core performance, which is crucial for Fivem given that many game logic tasks are single-threaded. The Geekbench scores of 2374 single-core and 12362 multi-core further corroborate this strength. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3841 and multithread score of 26825 place it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs.

The Ryzen 5 7500F's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.1% slower), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, 0.2% faster), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, 0.2% slower), and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, 0.4% slower). With an average benchmark score of 24964, this CPU sits in a tight cluster of similarly performing processors, suggesting that Fivem's performance at lower resolutions is not uniquely dependent on this specific CPU model but rather benefits from its strong per-core efficiency.

The evidence for CPU limitation appears in the 1080p results. At 1080p Low, the system produces 200 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it produces 98 FPS. This 102 FPS difference is attributable to the GPU's increasing workload, yet the fact that 1080p Low exceeds 200 FPS indicates the CPU can feed the GPU at very high frame rates. However, the 4K Low result of 73 FPS versus the 1080p Low result of 200 FPS shows a 64% drop, which is far larger than the pixel count difference (4x), suggesting that the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K while the CPU has significant headroom.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and 5 nm process node (TSMC) contribute to efficient operation, though the measured FPS data does not directly quantify power efficiency. The CPU's ECC memory support and DDR5 memory compatibility (dual-channel) position it as a modern platform component, with the AMD Socket AM5 ensuring future upgrade paths.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1681 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 55th percentile of all tested pairings. This rank reflects a balanced system that is neither at the top tier nor in the lower echelons, but rather sits comfortably in the middle-to-upper range of performance.

The rank is driven by the GPU's 71st percentile standing and the CPU's 77th percentile standing, yet the combined rank is lower than either individual component's percentile. This discrepancy suggests that Fivem's performance is not perfectly correlated with raw component benchmarks, and that the game's specific optimization characteristics may favor certain architectural features. The GPU's nearest rivals (R9 M395X, FirePro W7100, FirePro D700, RTX 3080 Ti Mobile) are largely older or mobile parts, indicating that the RX 6750 XT is well-positioned among desktop GPUs, while the CPU's rivals are similarly modern parts.

The measured FPS data provides context for this rank. At 1080p, the system achieves 126 FPS at High settings, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 1440p, the High preset yields 83 FPS, still comfortably playable. At 4K, the system requires Medium settings to achieve 58 FPS, which is borderline for competitive play but acceptable for casual sessions. This performance profile suggests that the combo is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a secondary consideration.

Compared to the 3707 total combos, a rank of 1681 means roughly 45% of tested systems outperform this one in Fivem, while 55% perform worse. This is a solid result for a mid-range GPU paired with a strong mid-range CPU, and the data indicates that the system is well-balanced without obvious bottlenecks at typical gaming resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings presets vary by resolution, with the goal of maintaining at least 60 FPS while maximizing visual quality.

At 1080p, the High preset at 126 FPS is the recommended choice. This provides a 53% improvement over the Ultra preset's 98 FPS while delivering most of the visual fidelity. The Low preset at 200 FPS is excessive for most displays, and the Medium preset at 158 FPS is viable for high-refresh-rate monitors, but High offers the best balance of visual quality and performance headroom. The Ultra preset's 98 FPS is still smooth, but the marginal visual gains over High may not justify the 22% performance cost.

At 1440p, the High preset at 83 FPS is the clear recommendation. This exceeds the 60 FPS target by 38% and provides excellent visual quality. The Medium preset at 104 FPS is also viable for users prioritizing frame rate, while the Ultra preset at 65 FPS is just above the 60 FPS threshold but leaves little room for frame time spikes. The Low preset at 132 FPS is unnecessary for most users, as High provides a 37% improvement in visual quality at a 37% FPS cost.

At 4K, the Medium preset at 58 FPS is the only viable option for smooth gameplay, and even then, it falls slightly below the 60 FPS target. The measured minimum of 49 FPS for this preset indicates occasional dips that may be noticeable. The High preset at 46 FPS is playable but not ideal, and the Ultra preset at 36 FPS is not recommended. For 4K users, the Low preset at 73 FPS is an alternative that sacrifices visual quality for frame rate stability, but Medium provides the best compromise between the two.

Overall, the data indicates that High settings at 1080p and 1440p, and Medium settings at 4K, offer the best measured experience for this combo. Users with high-refresh-rate displays should consider the Medium preset at 1080p (158 FPS) or 1440p (104 FPS) to maximize smoothness.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 1440p with High settings delivers 83 FPS, which is smoother than 4K and offers better visual fidelity than 1080p. For maximum frame rates, 1080p Low achieves 200 FPS, but 1440p High provides the best overall balance of visual quality and performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but only at Medium settings, which produce 58 FPS average with a 49 FPS minimum. High settings at 4K yield 46 FPS, which is borderline playable, while Ultra settings at 36 FPS are not recommended for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT compare to its nearest rivals in Fivem?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 26011 is 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, 0.6% higher than the AMD FirePro W7100, 0.7% higher than the AMD FirePro D700, and 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. This indicates it leads all four nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests minimal CPU bottlenecking at 1080p Low, where the system reaches 200 FPS. At 1080p Ultra (98 FPS), the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 indicates strong per-core performance that supports high frame rates.

Q: What settings should I use for a 60 Hz display?

A: For a 60 Hz display, the data recommends High settings at 4K (46 FPS is close but slightly under), or Medium settings at 4K (58 FPS) for a stable experience. At 1440p, even Ultra settings (65 FPS) exceed 60 FPS, so all presets are viable.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 1681 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the upper half of all tested systems. The CPU ranks at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU at the 71st percentile of all GPUs, indicating a balanced pairing.