Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT pairing delivers a highly capable Fivem experience, placing in the 52nd percentile of all tested combinations. The data reveals a system that scales predictably across resolutions, with performance that shifts from being heavily GPU-bound at 4K to increasingly CPU-reliant at 1080p. Benchmark results indicate that this combo is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gameplay, while 4K remains playable but requires careful settings management.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall standing of this CPU and GPU combo in the Fivem benchmark database?

A: This combination ranks 1937 out of 3707 total tested combos, placing it in the 52nd percentile. This indicates it performs slightly better than the median system tested, offering a solid mid-range experience for Fivem.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F's CPU performance compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, putting it on par with the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.1% faster) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, 0.2% slower). It also edges out the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911) by 0.2% and the Intel Core 5 210H (24872) by 0.4%.

Q: In the same synthetic benchmark context, how does the RX 6700 XT stack up against its GPU rivals?

A: The RX 6700 XT's average benchmark score is 27425. This is virtually identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (27435, 0.0% delta). It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27565) and 1.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839), but 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (27135).

Q: What is the peak average FPS achievable with this combo at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 191 FPS at 1920x1080 with the "Low" settings preset. This indicates the system has a substantial performance headroom at the lowest settings, likely becoming CPU-limited at this point.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo, and under what conditions?

A: The lowest average frame rate is 34 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 (4K) resolution with the "Ultra" settings preset. This shows that the most demanding configuration pushes the GPU to its limits, resulting in a less fluid experience.

Q: Are there any recorded frame time variance data points for this combo?

A: Yes, the "Medium" preset is the only one with min and max FPS data across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, frames range from 128 to 173 FPS; at 1440p Medium, they range from 84 to 114 FPS; and at 4K Medium, they range from 47 to 63 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture, manufactured on a 5nm process by TSMC. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz, which can boost up to 5.00 GHz, and it carries a 65 W TDP. For Fivem, a multiplayer game that often needs to manage many entities and player interactions, the single-thread performance is critical. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 974 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 suggest strong per-core capability, which helps maintain high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck.

The processor's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache can be beneficial in game scenarios where frequently accessed data needs to be quickly available to all cores. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, ensuring the rest of the system can keep up with the processor's demands. In the context of Fivem's measured FPS, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings.

At 1080p Low, the combo hits 191 FPS, a figure that is significantly higher than the 4K Low result of 70 FPS. This stark difference suggests that at 1080p with minimal graphical load, the frame rate is being capped or heavily influenced by the CPU's ability to process the game's logic and draw calls. The Ryzen 5 7500F's percentile rank of 77 against all CPUs, combined with its average benchmark score of 24964, demonstrates that it is a competent gaming processor. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13620H, scores nearly identically (24911), indicating similar overall processing capabilities for this type of workload.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, fabricated on a 7nm process. It features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 40 ray-tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2321 MHz and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2424 MHz. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a strong asset for Fivem, which often features custom assets and mods that can consume significant VRAM.

The GPU's raw compute power is rated at 13.21 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. Its performance in synthetic benchmarks places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 27425. This places it in direct competition with high-end mobile GPUs, as evidenced by its near-identical score to the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (27435). The 12 GB VRAM buffer is crucial for maintaining stability at higher resolutions and with higher texture quality settings. The data suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K resolution.

This is clearly illustrated by the FPS drop from 70 FPS at 4K Low to 44 FPS at 4K High. The GPU is being tasked with rendering four times the pixels of 1080p, and its performance scales accordingly. In contrast, at 1080p, the GPU has more headroom to render frames quickly, allowing the CPU to become the determining factor for the maximum frame rate. The RX 6700 XT's performance relative to the RTX 3090 is notable; despite the 3090 having a slightly higher average score (27565, -0.5% delta from the 6700 XT), the 6700 XT delivers a playable experience in Fivem across the board.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo's performance trajectory. At 1920x1080, the system is capable of very high frame rates. With the "Low" preset, it achieves an average of 191 FPS. Moving to "Medium" drops the average to 151 FPS, with a minimum of 128 and maximum of 173 FPS. The "High" preset yields 120 FPS, and the "Ultra" preset brings the average down to 93 FPS. This progression shows a smooth performance curve, with each settings tier costing roughly 25-30 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but scales down as expected. The "Low" preset delivers an average of 126 FPS. The "Medium" preset averages 99 FPS (min 84, max 114), and "High" drops to 79 FPS. The "Ultra" preset at 1440p results in an average of 62 FPS. This resolution offers a sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors, as even the "High" preset maintains a frame rate above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The "Low" preset averages 70 FPS, which is playable but a far cry from the 1080p results. "Medium" averages 55 FPS (min 47, max 63), placing it right at the edge of smoothness. "High" drops to 44 FPS, and "Ultra" falls to 34 FPS. The 4K results indicate that while 4K is possible, users will need to compromise on visual fidelity to maintain a consistent frame rate. The delta between 1080p Low (191 FPS) and 4K Low (70 FPS) is stark, highlighting the massive rendering load increase at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo's rank of 1937 out of 3707 tested configurations places it squarely in the middle of the pack. Being in the 52nd percentile means it outperforms just over half of all systems tested in Fivem. This is a respectable position, especially considering the hardware's specifications. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking against all CPUs is higher than the GPU's 72nd percentile, suggesting the processor is a relative strength of this pairing.

The synthetic benchmark scores for the components are remarkably close to their rivals. The CPU sits within a 0.4% margin of its nearest competitors, indicating that its processing power is on par with a broad group of mid-to-high-end chips. Similarly, the GPU's score is within a 1.5% margin of its rivals, which include the powerful RTX 3090. This suggests that in a game like Fivem, the combination of the Ryzen 5 7500F and RX 6700 XT provides a balanced platform, and its overall rank is a result of this equilibrium rather than one component dominating.

The ranking implies that this system is a dependable choice for Fivem. It is not at the bleeding edge of performance, but it is far from entry-level. In practical terms, this rank means the system will handle the game's default environments with ease and provide the headroom needed for moderately populated servers or some custom content. The data shows a mid-tier pairing that maximizes value through balance rather than raw top-end power.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's resolution and performance targets. For 1920x1080, the "High" preset at 120 FPS is an excellent choice for those with 120Hz or 144Hz monitors, offering a substantial visual upgrade over "Medium" while maintaining a very smooth experience. The "Ultra" preset at 93 FPS is still highly playable and is recommended for users who prioritize image quality over pushing the maximum refresh rate.

For 2560x1440, the "High" preset at 79 FPS is the standout recommendation. It strikes an ideal balance, delivering a significant improvement over the "Medium" preset's 99 FPS in visual quality while staying comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The "Ultra" preset at 62 FPS is also viable for those who want the best visuals and have a 60Hz monitor, but the "High" preset provides a more consistent experience.

At 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. The "Low" preset at 70 FPS is the only option that consistently breaks the 60 FPS barrier. The "Medium" preset at 55 FPS is a playable compromise for 4K, offering a better visual experience than "Low" at the cost of some fluidity. The "High" and "Ultra" presets, at 44 and 34 FPS respectively, are generally not recommended for a smooth gameplay experience. For 4K users, the "Low" or "Medium" presets are the pragmatic choices.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 191 FPS. This drops by 34% to 126 FPS at 1440p Low, and then by another 44% to 70 FPS at 4K Low. This scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, demanding significantly more from the rendering hardware.

The trend is similar across other settings. For the "High" preset, the FPS drops from 120 at 1080p to 79 at 1440p (a 34% decrease) and then to 44 at 4K (a 44% decrease). This consistent pattern across settings confirms that the RX 6700 XT's rendering capacity is the bottleneck as resolution climbs. The CPU's role is less pronounced in these scaling factors, as its workload does not increase proportionally with resolution.

The data implies that the Ryzen 5 7500F has sufficient processing headroom to feed the GPU at higher resolutions, as the FPS drop is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's pixel rendering workload. However, at 1080p, the gap between the CPU's potential and the GPU's output narrows. The 191 FPS at 1080p Low suggests the CPU is nearing its practical limit for this game's engine, as the GPU could likely render frames faster if the CPU could provide more data. This indicates a well-matched pairing, where the CPU is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking at mainstream resolutions, but the GPU's performance ceiling is the defining factor for high-resolution gaming.