Fivem

Fivem

AVERAGE FPS
151
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 151 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 71 89 112
1440p QHD 99 128 160 203
1080p Full HD 151 194 243 308

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 112
3840x2160 Medium 89
3840x2160 High 71
3840x2160 Ultra 55
2560x1440 Low 203
2560x1440 Medium 160
2560x1440 High 128
2560x1440 Ultra 99
1920x1080 Low 308
1920x1080 Medium 243
1920x1080 High 194
1920x1080 Ultra 151

Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F posts an average benchmark score of 24964, placing it virtually neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, 0.2% slower), and the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, 0.2% faster). The largest gap is against the Intel Core 5 210H, which trails by 0.4%.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 and GRID M60-1Q both score slightly higher at 31206 and 31220 respectively, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (31532) and TITAN RTX (31676) lead by 1.4% and 1.9%.

Q: What is the best 4K performance recorded for this combo?

A: At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 112, achieved at Low settings. Medium settings deliver 89 FPS, High drops to 71 FPS, and Ultra falls to 55 FPS.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested combinations for Fivem?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F plus RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks 411th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top 11% of all configurations for this game.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU and how does it compare to the CPU?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s, while the Ryzen 5 7500F's dual-channel DDR5 memory provides 83.2 GB/s — an 8x difference favoring the GPU.

Q: Which setting provides the most consistent frame pacing at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings show a min FPS of 136 and max FPS of 184, with an average of 160 FPS. This tighter range suggests more consistent frame delivery compared to other settings at that resolution.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process and packs 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed, yielding 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 2340 MHz, boosting to 2610 MHz, and it features 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. With 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, the card is equipped for ray tracing and AI workloads, though Fivem's measured results suggest rasterization performance is the primary driver.

The 16 GB frame buffer is substantial for a multiplayer game at 4K. Looking at the measured FPS, the GPU's role becomes clear: at 3840x2160, dropping from Ultra to Low settings yields a jump from 55 FPS to 112 FPS — a 57 FPS swing. This scaling indicates the GPU is the dominant component at 4K, as reducing graphical load directly translates to higher frame rates. The Medium preset at 4K shows a min of 75 FPS and max of 102 FPS, suggesting the card handles moderate loads with acceptable consistency.

At 1440p, the GPU still matters, but the picture shifts. High settings produce 128 FPS, while Low hits 203 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 104 FPS, showing that settings have a massive impact on GPU-bound scenarios. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s provide the raw throughput needed for these frame rates. The GPU's percentile ranking of 76 against all GPUs places it in the upper quartile, though its nearest rivals in the database — the Quadro M5000 and GRID M60-1Q — are workstation parts with different optimization profiles.

The card's 285 W TDP and triple-slot design indicate it's a high-power part, but the benchmark data shows it delivers. The 1x 16-pin power connector and 600 W suggested PSU are notable for system builders, though these are configuration details rather than performance metrics. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, which may influence availability but not the measured results here.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) at a 5 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts to 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 via dual-channel, providing 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The socket is AMD AM5, and the chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p, where frame rates are extremely high. At 1920x1080 Low settings, the combo hits 308 FPS — the highest measured result across all resolutions. This suggests the CPU can feed frames quickly enough to saturate the GPU even at low graphical loads. The single-thread performance is strong: the 3DMark single-thread score is 974, and Cinebench R23 single-core hits 3218. Multi-threaded results are equally solid, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 22799 and Geekbench multicore at 12362.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 77 against all CPUs places it above the GPU's 76, indicating the processor is slightly stronger relative to its peers. The nearest rivals show tight clustering: the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935), Ryzen 5 8400F (25005), and Core i7-13620H (24911) are all within 0.2% of the 7500F's 24964 average score. This implies the CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios, as its performance is squarely in line with comparable options.

At 1440p, the CPU still has headroom. The jump from Low (203 FPS) to Medium (160 FPS) to High (128 FPS) shows a linear progression, but even at Ultra (99 FPS), the CPU is likely not the limiting factor. At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes further, as the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration is sufficient for Fivem's multiplayer workloads, which typically scale across a few threads rather than requiring massive core counts. The 32 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, aiding in data locality for game logic.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 411th out of 3707 tested combinations for Fivem, placing it in the 89th percentile of all configurations. This is a strong result, but not top-tier. The ranking suggests that while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and Ryzen 5 7500F are both capable components, there are 410 combos that achieve higher average FPS in this game. Given the GPU's percentile of 76 and CPU's percentile of 77, the combo performs slightly better than either component's individual standing might suggest — a positive synergy.

The rank of 411 out of 3707 means this setup is ahead of roughly 89% of all tested combos. This is notable because Fivem is a multiplayer game that can be sensitive to server-side performance and player count, which often introduces CPU overhead. The Ryzen 5 7500F's strong single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core at 3218) likely helps maintain high frame rates in crowded scenarios. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is also advantageous for high-resolution textures in a game where user-generated content can increase memory demands.

Comparing to the nearest rival combos isn't directly possible from the data, but the CPU's rivals show the 7500F is within 0.4% of similar processors. This tight clustering means the CPU choice among these options would have minimal impact on Fivem performance. The GPU's rivals are workstation-oriented, which are unlikely to be used in gaming rigs, making the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER a more practical choice for this game despite similar benchmark scores.

The ranking data implies that for users seeking higher Fivem performance, the bottleneck likely lies elsewhere — perhaps in faster GPUs or CPUs with higher boost clocks. However, for a balanced 6-core/12-thread CPU paired with a high-end GPU, this combo delivers solid results that should satisfy most players at high refresh rates.

Settings Recommendations

At 1080p, the data shows that Low settings produce 308 FPS, Medium 243 FPS, High 194 FPS, and Ultra 151 FPS. For competitive play, Low settings maximize frame rates, but the jump from Low to Medium costs 65 FPS (21%), while High to Ultra costs 43 FPS (22%). The Medium preset at 1080p shows a min of 206 FPS and max of 279 FPS, indicating good consistency. For most players, Medium offers a strong balance between visual quality and performance, as the 243 FPS average is well above the refresh rate of most monitors.

At 1440p, the recommendations shift. Low hits 203 FPS, Medium 160 FPS, High 128 FPS, and Ultra 99 FPS. The Medium preset's min of 136 FPS and max of 184 FPS show a 48 FPS range, which is tighter than at 1080p. This makes Medium the recommended setting for 1440p if the goal is to maintain a high refresh rate, while High is acceptable for those prioritizing visuals at 128 FPS. Ultra at 99 FPS is still playable but may not satisfy users with 144 Hz monitors.

At 4K, the choices are more constrained. Low delivers 112 FPS, Medium 89 FPS, High 71 FPS, and Ultra 55 FPS. The Medium preset's min of 75 FPS and max of 102 FPS suggest it can hold above 60 FPS in most scenarios, making it the best option for a smooth 4K experience. Low is viable for users targeting 120 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant. Ultra at 55 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold, so it's not recommended for consistent gameplay.

The best overall experience depends on resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p and 1440p, Medium provides a robust combination of frame rate and visual fidelity. At 4K, Medium is the sweet spot, with Low as a fallback for higher FPS. The data indicates that the combo scales linearly with settings, so users can tune based on their preferences without unexpected drops.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest performance. Low settings average 308 FPS, which is the peak across all resolutions and settings. Medium averages 243 FPS with a min of 206 and max of 279. High drops to 194 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 151 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 157 FPS reduction, representing a 51% performance loss at the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, the results show a proportional decline. Low averages 203 FPS, Medium 160 FPS (min 136, max 184), High 128 FPS, and Ultra 99 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 104 FPS, which is a 51% drop — identical to the 1080p scaling. This consistency suggests the GPU is handling the resolution increase uniformly.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low averages 112 FPS, Medium 89 FPS (min 75, max 102), High 71 FPS, and Ultra 55 FPS. The gap from Low to Ultra is 57 FPS, a 51% reduction. Interestingly, the percentage drop from Low to Ultra is the same across all resolutions (51%), indicating that settings have a consistent multiplicative effect on performance.

The Medium settings at each resolution provide the only min/max data: 1080p shows 206-279 FPS, 1440p shows 136-184 FPS, and 4K shows 75-102 FPS. The ranges suggest that at 4K, the frame pacing is more variable, with a 27 FPS swing, while at 1080p it's 73 FPS. This implies that at higher resolutions, the GPU's workload is more consistent, but the average FPS is lower.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are substantial across all settings. At Low, the average FPS falls from 308 to 112, a 63.6% reduction. At Medium, it drops from 243 to 89, a 63.4% reduction. High goes from 194 to 71, a 63.4% reduction. Ultra falls from 151 to 55, a 63.6% reduction. The consistency of these percentages — all within 0.2% of 63.5% — indicates that the performance scaling is purely resolution-driven, with no setting interacting with resolution in a non-linear way.

This uniform scaling suggests the limiting component is the GPU. From 1080p to 1440p, the FPS drops by about 33% (e.g., Low from 308 to 203, a 34.1% reduction). From 1440p to 4K, the drop is about 45% (e.g., Low from 203 to 112, a 44.8% reduction). The larger drop from 1440p to 4K reflects the 2.25x pixel count increase, which overwhelms the GPU's capabilities.

The CPU's role in this scaling is minimal. At 1080p Low, the 308 FPS suggests the CPU can push frames well beyond typical monitor refresh rates. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we'd expect the FPS to plateau at higher settings, but the linear scaling indicates the GPU is the constraint. The Ryzen 5 7500F's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU even at 1080p, as evidenced by the high frame rates.

The data implies that for users targeting 4K, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the limiting factor, and settings must be lowered to achieve playable frame rates. At 1440p, the combo is well-balanced, with the GPU handling the load while the CPU keeps pace. At 1080p, the GPU is underutilized, and users could potentially benefit from a lower-cost GPU without sacrificing FPS, though the 7500F's strong single-thread performance ensures no CPU-side bottlenecks. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for 4K textures, but the GPU's raw compute power — 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 — is what determines the frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2610 MHz MHz
TDP 285 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in Fivem

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 112.0
3840x2160 Medium 89.0
3840x2160 High 71.0
3840x2160 Ultra 55.0
2560x1440 Low 203.0
2560x1440 Medium 160.0
2560x1440 High 128.0
2560x1440 Ultra 99.0
1920x1080 Low 308.0
1920x1080 Medium 243.0
1920x1080 High 194.0
1920x1080 Ultra 151.0

Fivem with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fivem with RTX 4070 Ti SUPER + Other CPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.