Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer modification for Grand Theft Auto V, and the combination of an AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 produces a highly resolution-sensitive experience. This pairing lands in the 2887th position out of 3005 tested combos for this game, placing it in the bottom 4% of all configurations measured. The data reveals a system that is consistently GPU-bound across all settings, with the processor's substantial headroom unable to compensate for the graphics card's limitations at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a steep and consistent drop as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, confirming that the GTX 1650 is the dominant limiting factor in this configuration. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo averages 76 FPS, which is the highest result recorded across all resolutions and settings. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same Low preset, average FPS falls to 50, a reduction of 26 FPS (approximately 34%). At 3840x2160 Low, the average drops further to 28 FPS, which represents only a 37% retention of the 1080p Low performance level.

The scaling pattern is even more pronounced at higher quality presets. At High settings, the system delivers 48 FPS at 1080p, 32 FPS at 1440p, and just 18 FPS at 4K. This translates to a 33% performance loss when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 44% loss when moving from 1440p to 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic degradation: 37 FPS at 1080p, 25 FPS at 1440p, and only 14 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 14 FPS is the lowest figure in the entire dataset, representing a 62% drop from the 1080p Ultra score.

These results indicate that the GTX 1650's 4 GB of GDDR5 memory and 128.1 GB/s bandwidth are simply insufficient for Fivem's demands at high pixel counts. The fact that even Low settings at 4K cannot reach 30 FPS (averaging 28 FPS) shows that the GPU is overwhelmed regardless of graphical complexity. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is substantial across all presets, but the 1440p to 4K transition is particularly punishing, suggesting that memory bandwidth constraints become acute beyond 1440p. The 1080p results are the only resolution where this combo achieves playable frame rates, and even then, only Low and Medium presets exceed 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's ranking of 2887 out of 3005 tested combinations places it in the bottom 4% of all systems measured for Fivem. This is a remarkably low position that reflects the GTX 1650's age and entry-level positioning. The GPU itself sits at the 40th percentile among all tested graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 7472. Its nearest rivals in synthetic testing include the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447, 0.3% slower), Intel UHD Graphics 750 (7441, 0.4% slower), and AMD Radeon R7 350 (7425, 0.6% slower). The only faster close competitor is the Intel Arc A310, which scores 7550, a 1% advantage.

The CPU, by contrast, is a much stronger component. The Ryzen 5 7400F sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% slower), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0.2% slower), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% slower). The only faster close competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, which scores 32812, a 0.2% advantage. This massive disparity between CPU and GPU capability explains why the combo ranks so poorly: the processor is capable of far more than the graphics card can deliver, particularly at higher resolutions.

The ranking data suggests that this combination is severely bottlenecked by the GPU in Fivem. Even at 1080p Low, where the system achieves its best result of 76 FPS, the CPU is likely not being fully utilized. The 4K Ultra result of 14 FPS is so far below playable that it indicates the GPU is operating at its absolute limit, while the CPU likely remains under 50% utilization. For context, the combo's rank relative to the 3005 tested configurations means that 118 other combinations performed worse, but the vast majority of systems deliver substantially better Fivem performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. Its 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier make it a versatile desktop part, and it achieved a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU due to the nature of the bottleneck. The processor's strong single-threaded performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3689) is beneficial for the game's simulation and scripting tasks, which are typically single-thread bound. However, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the limiting component at every resolution and settings combination. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads provide ample headroom for Fivem's multi-threaded elements, but this headroom goes largely unused because the GTX 1650 cannot feed frames fast enough.

The CPU's benchmark scores indicate it is more than capable of handling Fivem's CPU demands. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9141 and single-core score of 1290 place it well above the threshold needed for smooth gameplay. The PassMark multithread score of 25645 and physics score of 1660 further confirm its capability. The processor's 32 MB of L3 cache is particularly relevant for Fivem, as the game's open-world assets and NPC logic benefit from larger cache capacities. The Ryzen 5 7400F's position at the 83rd CPU percentile means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in synthetic tests, yet the combo's in-game rank of 2887 shows that this strength is entirely neutralized by the GPU bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the best FPS this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 76 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data that approaches high refresh rate territory, while Medium at 1080p achieves 60 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this combo?

A: The GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The GTX 1650 ranks at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 7400F ranks at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The FPS drops dramatically with resolution increases, which is characteristic of GPU-bound systems.

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K?

A: Technically yes, but not at playable frame rates. At 4K Low settings, the average FPS is 28, dropping to 18 FPS at High and 14 FPS at Ultra. None of these results approach the 30 FPS minimum that most consider playable.

Q: How does the GTX 1650 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GTX 1650 has an average benchmark score of 7472. The Intel Arc A310 is 1% faster with a score of 7550, while the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447), Intel UHD Graphics 750 (7441), and AMD Radeon R7 350 (7425) are all within 0.6% slower.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?

A: Low settings at 1080p delivers 76 FPS, while Medium delivers 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS. High drops to 48 FPS, and Ultra falls to 37 FPS. Medium at 1080p offers the best balance of visual quality and playability.

Q: Does the CPU's strong benchmark performance translate to Fivem?

A: No, the CPU's performance is largely wasted in this combo. The Ryzen 5 7400F's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 are strong, but the GTX 1650 cannot produce enough frames to utilize this headroom, especially at resolutions above 1080p.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is an entry-level graphics card based on the Turing architecture, built on TSMC's 12 nm process. It features 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, with a base clock of 1485 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 128.1 GB/s of bandwidth. Its FP32 performance is rated at 2.984 TFLOPS, with a pixel rate of 53.28 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 93.24 GTexel/s. The card is end-of-life, with a launch MSRP of 149 USD, and it sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 7472.

In Fivem, the GTX 1650's limitations are starkly exposed. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface are the primary bottlenecks at higher resolutions. At 4K, the card cannot maintain 30 FPS even at Low settings, and the Ultra preset produces just 14 FPS. The memory bandwidth of 128.1 GB/s is insufficient for the high-resolution textures and draw distances that Fivem requires, leading to severe frame rate drops. The card's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 305 and PassMark G3D score of 7880 illustrate its modest compute capability, which is further confirmed by its nearest rival comparisons showing it is only 1% faster than the Intel Arc A310 and roughly 0.6% faster than the AMD Radeon R7 350.

The GPU's performance at 1080p is more reasonable, with Low settings achieving 76 FPS and Medium achieving 60 FPS. However, the card's 4 GB VRAM becomes a liability even at 1080p when using High or Ultra presets, as the frame rate drops to 48 FPS and 37 FPS respectively. The measured data shows that the GTX 1650's compute capabilities are adequate for 1080p gaming at lower presets, but the memory subsystem cannot keep up with more demanding settings. The card's DirectX 12 PassMark score of 35, which is actually lower than its DirectX 11 score of 58, suggests that the architecture struggles with modern API workloads. This is consistent with the observed FPS behavior, where the GPU's limitations become more pronounced as graphical complexity increases.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, which is the only resolution where this system delivers consistently playable results, Medium settings provide the best balance of visual quality and performance. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay with only occasional dips. Low settings at 1080p achieve 76 FPS average, which is better for competitive play but sacrifices visual fidelity. High at 1080p drops to 48 FPS, which is borderline acceptable, while Ultra at 37 FPS may cause noticeable stutter.

For 2560x1440, the data shows that Low settings are the only viable option, delivering 50 FPS average. Medium at 1440p averages 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 FPS, which may be tolerable for less demanding situations but will struggle in busy multiplayer areas. High at 1440p drops to 32 FPS, and Ultra to 25 FPS, both of which are below comfortable playability thresholds. At 3840x2160, no preset is recommended. Even Low settings only achieve 28 FPS, which is below the 30 FPS minimum standard, and all other presets fall well short of playable levels, with Ultra at 14 FPS.

The data strongly suggests that Fivem players using this combo should stick to 1080p resolution for the best experience. Within that resolution, Medium is the recommended preset because it maintains 60 FPS average while providing better textures and effects than Low. The minimum FPS of 51 at Medium ensures that frame times remain consistent enough to avoid major hitches. For users prioritizing frame rate over visuals, Low at 76 FPS is the clear choice. The 1080p High preset at 48 FPS is a compromise that some may accept, but the 1080p Ultra at 37 FPS is not recommended due to the risk of visible frame pacing issues. The GTX 1650's 4 GB VRAM is the key constraint, and Medium settings at 1080p appear to keep memory usage within acceptable limits based on the measured stability.