Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti combination delivers a playable but constrained experience in Fivem, with the measured data showing a clear pattern of GPU-bound performance at higher resolutions and a more balanced workload at 1080p. This pairing, ranking 2588 out of 3005 tested combos, produces its best results at 1080p Medium settings, where it achieves an average of 97 FPS, while the lowest settings push the average to 122 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware in Fivem?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 with Low settings produces the highest average FPS at 122, but 1920x1080 with Medium settings offers a better balance at 97 FPS average with a minimum of 82 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset drops to 51 FPS average, and 3840x2160 High falls to 28 FPS average.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697). It sits 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662).

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards in the benchmark database?

A: The GTX 1660 Ti has an average benchmark score of 7723 and a percentile rank of 41, meaning it performs better than 41% of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 540, scores 0.7% lower at 7673, while the Intel Arc A310 trails by 2.3% with a score of 7550.

Q: How much FPS is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 77 at 1920x1080 to 51 at 2560x1440, a 26 FPS reduction, and then further to 28 at 3840x2160, another 23 FPS reduction. The same pattern appears at Medium settings: 97 FPS at 1080p, 64 FPS at 1440p, and 35 FPS at 4K.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU act as the limiting factor in Fivem performance?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 22, while at 4K Low it is 45, showing that graphical settings have a massive impact on frame rate. The CPU's high benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765, suggest it has ample headroom that goes unused when the GPU is stressed.

Q: What are the key specifications of the Ryzen 5 7400F processor?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael). It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. It supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and provides 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy of playability for this combo in Fivem. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 122 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this configuration. However, the Medium preset at 1080p offers a more compelling experience with an average of 97 FPS and a documented minimum of 82 FPS, suggesting smoother frame pacing than the Low preset, which lacks min/max data.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Medium preset still provides a playable experience at 64 FPS average with a minimum of 54 FPS, while the High preset drops to 51 FPS average. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves a comfortable 60 FPS average; the Low preset reaches 45 FPS average, Medium hits 35 FPS, and High falls to 28 FPS. The Ultra preset is the worst performer at every resolution, ranging from 60 FPS at 1080p down to 22 FPS at 4K.

The data suggests the optimal experience is 1920x1080 with Medium settings. This configuration provides a 97 FPS average, which is 20 FPS higher than the High preset at the same resolution, while retaining a minimum of 82 FPS that keeps gameplay fluid. For users prioritizing frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 1080p achieves 122 FPS, but the lack of min/max data for that mode makes the Medium preset a safer recommendation for consistent performance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a Turing-architecture GPU built on a 12 nm process, featuring a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

In Fivem, the GPU's role is clearly dominant at higher resolutions. The measured FPS shows that at 3840x2160, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 23 FPS (45 vs 22), which is a 51% reduction in performance. This wide spread indicates that the GTX 1660 Ti's compute and memory resources are heavily taxed when pixel count increases. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is a potential constraint at 4K, where texture-heavy scenes may exceed this limit, though the measured data does not explicitly confirm VRAM overflow.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range positioning. It scores 12871 in Passmark G3D and 1061 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a percentile rank of 41 among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 540, scores 0.7% lower, while the Intel Arc A310 trails by 2.3%. These scores place the GTX 1660 Ti in a performance tier where 1080p Medium is the realistic ceiling for maintaining high frame rates in Fivem.

How This Combo Ranks

The Ryzen 5 7400F + GTX 1660 Ti combination ranks 2588 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 14% of all configurations tested. This ranking reflects the GPU's modest performance tier more than the CPU's capabilities, as the Ryzen 5 7400F itself has an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs.

The combo's poor relative standing is understandable when examining the measured FPS data. At 1080p, the combo achieves 77 FPS on High settings, which is respectable, but at 4K it falls to 28 FPS on High, indicating a significant struggle at higher resolutions. The GPU's 41st percentile ranking and its benchmark scores, which are all within 2.3% of its nearest rivals, suggest that this combo's performance is limited by the graphics card rather than the processor.

The data shows that this combo sits in a middle ground: it can handle 1080p gaming well, with the Medium preset hitting 97 FPS average, but it cannot sustain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K. This ranking of 2588 out of 3005 indicates that most other tested combos offer better performance in Fivem, likely due to more powerful GPUs that can handle the game's demands at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael). It operates at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

In Fivem, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU based on the measured data. The processor's strong benchmark scores—including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072—suggest it has ample compute capability for game logic and physics. However, the FPS scaling across resolutions tells a different story: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 122 FPS, but at 4K Low it drops to 45 FPS, a 63% reduction that points to GPU limitation rather than CPU bottleneck.

The CPU's Passmark scores further illustrate its strength: it scores 25645 in multi-thread, 3689 in single-thread, and 45799 in floating-point math. These numbers place it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H in average benchmark score. Given this processing power, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in Fivem at any of the tested settings, leaving the GTX 1660 Ti as the primary constraint on frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Fivem provides a complete picture of this combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 122 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded. The Medium preset delivers 97 FPS average with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 111 FPS. High settings produce 77 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 60 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, performance decreases noticeably. Low settings achieve 81 FPS average, Medium delivers 64 FPS average with a minimum of 54 FPS and maximum of 73 FPS, High produces 51 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS average. The step from 1080p Medium to 1440p Medium represents a 33 FPS loss, while the step from 1440p Medium to 4K Medium is a 29 FPS loss.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings achieve 45 FPS average, Medium delivers 35 FPS average with a minimum of 30 FPS and maximum of 41 FPS, High produces 28 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 22 FPS average. The data shows that only the Low preset at 4K achieves an average above 40 FPS, suggesting that 4K gaming is not a viable option for this hardware combination in Fivem.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling behavior reveals a consistent pattern of performance degradation as pixel count increases. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 77 at 1080p to 51 at 1440p, a 33.8% reduction, and then to 28 at 4K, a further 45.1% reduction from 1440p. This indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the FPS loss scales roughly with the increase in pixel count.

At Medium settings, the scaling is similar but with slightly different magnitudes. The average FPS drops from 97 at 1080p to 64 at 1440p, a 34.0% reduction, and then to 35 at 4K, a 45.3% reduction from 1440p. The consistency of these percentage drops across settings presets suggests that the bottleneck is purely resolution-driven, not settings-driven, which points to the GPU's pixel throughput as the constraint.

The Low preset shows a different scaling pattern: 122 FPS at 1080p, 81 FPS at 1440p, and 45 FPS at 4K. This represents a 33.6% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 44.4% drop from 1440p to 4K. The similarity in percentage drops across all presets indicates that the limiting component is the GPU's rasterization and memory bandwidth, not the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7400F's high single-thread score of 3689 in Passmark and its 83rd percentile ranking suggest it has the headroom to feed the GTX 1660 Ti at all tested resolutions, making the GPU the clear bottleneck in Fivem.