Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the Intel Arc B390 presents a unique combination in Fivem, where the CPU’s strong multi-threaded capabilities are starkly contrasted by the GPU’s limited graphics throughput. The measured data reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound at most settings, with the CPU having ample headroom to spare. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy of performance across the three tested resolutions, with the sweet spot for playability found at 1920x1080.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for this combination in Fivem points to a very specific set of viable configurations. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 88 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. This setting provides the most headroom above the 60 FPS threshold and is the only configuration that approaches high-refresh-rate territory. The Medium preset at the same resolution yields a respectable 70 FPS average, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS, indicating a playable experience with slightly better visual fidelity. The High preset drops to 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target, and the Ultra preset falls further to 43 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the situation becomes more constrained. The Low preset produces an average of 58 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset averages 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS, showing a significant performance dip. Both High (37 FPS) and Ultra (29 FPS) at this resolution are not recommended for a fluid experience. At 3840x2160, all settings are below playable thresholds, ranging from 32 FPS on Low down to 16 FPS on Ultra.

For the best balance of visual quality and smoothness, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the optimal choice. It provides a 70 FPS average, which is a 27% improvement over the High preset’s 56 FPS while still offering a substantial upgrade in visual detail over the Low preset. The data shows that the performance gap between Medium and High is significant (a 14 FPS difference), making Medium the most efficient setting for this combo. The minimum FPS of 59 at this setting also indicates that frame pacing will be more consistent than at higher presets, which is crucial for a multiplayer game where responsiveness matters. For players who prioritize maximum frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 1920x1080 is the only option that delivers a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this combination at rank 2656 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, putting it in the bottom 12% of all configurations. This low ranking is a direct reflection of the GPU’s limited performance, which severely bottlenecks the otherwise capable CPU. The combo’s percentile rank of 9 for the GPU alone suggests that the graphics card is the primary factor dragging down the overall standing. While the Ryzen 5 5600F performs in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, its potential is largely unrealized in this pairing due to the graphics subsystem’s inability to keep pace.

The benchmark results indicate that this combo is not suited for high-refresh-rate competitive play or high-resolution gaming in Fivem. The rank signifies that a vast majority of other tested hardware combinations will deliver higher frame rates. The performance ceiling is clearly defined by the Intel Arc B390, as evidenced by the steep drop in FPS when moving from 1920x1080 to higher resolutions. This pairing would be considered a low-end configuration for Fivem, suitable only for those who accept significant compromises in visual settings and resolution to achieve a playable frame rate. The data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor; rather, the GPU’s performance tier is what anchors this combo to the lower end of the ranking spectrum.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the definitive bottleneck in this system. Its performance is characterized by a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482, which places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. This score is remarkably close to that of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463), a legacy mobile part, with the Arc B390 holding a mere 1.3% advantage. This context is crucial: the B390’s performance level is comparable to entry-level hardware from over a decade ago, making it unsuitable for demanding modern titles like Fivem at higher settings.

The GPU operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. It features 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 12 ray tracing cores. However, the most significant limiting factor is its memory configuration: the VRAM is listed as "System Shared," meaning it relies on shared system memory rather than dedicated GDDR6 or GDDR6X. This architecture results in "System Dependent" bandwidth, which is a severe constraint for a game that requires substantial texture and geometry data to be loaded. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS is theoretically respectable, but the memory bottleneck likely prevents it from being fully utilized.

The impact of this GPU configuration is clearly visible in the Fivem frame rates. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset yields only 43 FPS, while the Low preset reaches 88 FPS. This 45 FPS spread indicates that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are quickly saturated as the render load increases. The situation worsens dramatically at 3840x2160, where the Ultra preset manages just 16 FPS. The data shows that the Arc B390 is not a gaming-oriented part, and its performance in Fivem is consistent with its very low percentile ranking. It is an integrated-class GPU that cannot handle the demands of a modern multiplayer title beyond the most basic settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the performance is as follows: Low averages 88 FPS, Medium averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 and maximum of 80, High averages 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 43 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 51% drop in performance, indicating a steep cost for increased visual fidelity. The Medium preset is the only one that maintains an average above 60 FPS while providing a minimum above 55 FPS, making it the most stable option for consistent gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decline significantly. The Low preset averages 58 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset drops to 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 and maximum of 53. High and Ultra fall to 37 FPS and 29 FPS, respectively. The performance degradation from 1080p to 1440p is substantial, with the Low preset losing 30 FPS (from 88 to 58). This highlights the GPU’s inability to handle the increased pixel count and memory pressure that comes with a higher resolution.

At 3840x2160, the results are largely unplayable. The Low preset is the best performer at 32 FPS, followed by Medium at 25 FPS, High at 20 FPS, and Ultra at 16 FPS. The gap between Medium and Ultra is 9 FPS, but all of these values are below the threshold for a smooth experience. The data shows a clear pattern: this combo can only deliver a consistently playable experience at 1920x1080 with the Low or Medium presets. The 1440p and 4K results are indicative of a GPU that is overwhelmed by the resolution and settings demands.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware in Fivem?

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 with the Medium preset is the optimal choice, providing a 70 FPS average with a minimum of 59 FPS. This is the only configuration that offers a frame rate comfortably above 60 FPS while retaining a moderate level of visual quality. The Low preset at the same resolution is the fastest option at 88 FPS, but sacrifices significant visual detail.

Q: How does this combo perform at 2560x1440 resolution?

A: At 2560x1440, the performance is marginal. The Low preset averages 58 FPS, which is slightly below the ideal 60 FPS mark. The Medium preset drops to 46 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets fall to 37 and 29 FPS respectively. The data suggests that this resolution is not ideal for this hardware, as even the lowest settings fail to maintain a solid 60 FPS.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F or the Intel Arc B390 the limiting factor in this test?

A: The benchmark results indicate that the Intel Arc B390 is the primary limiting factor. The GPU holds a 9th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 85th percentile. The steep frame rate drops when increasing resolution or settings are characteristic of a GPU bottleneck, not a CPU limitation.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1920x1080?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 88 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 43 FPS. This represents a 51% performance decrease when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings, demonstrating the significant graphical load that Fivem places on the GPU.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc B390 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482. This is 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463) and 1.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1460). It also outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446) by 2.5% and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443) by 2.7%. These scores show it is in the same performance tier as these older, low-end parts.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 88, which occurs at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset. This is the only configuration that approaches high-refresh-rate performance. The next highest is 70 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F provides a strong foundation for this system, but its capabilities are largely untapped in Fivem due to the GPU bottleneck. This CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer), with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and has a TDP of 65 W. The processor features a 32 MB shared L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. Its multi-threaded PassMark score is 19236, and its single-thread score is 2872. With an average benchmark score of 36945, it ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating solid overall performance.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, -0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, -0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, -0.5% delta). These figures show that the 5600F is effectively tied with these other processors in raw synthetic benchmarks, with a negligible performance difference of less than 1%. This places the CPU in a competitive position for its class.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and the complex interactions of a multiplayer environment. The PassMark physics score of 1043 and the integer math score of 59339 suggest that the CPU has sufficient processing power for these tasks. However, the measured FPS data shows that the system is not CPU-limited. For example, at 1920x1080, moving from Low to Ultra settings causes the FPS to drop from 88 to 43, a change that is entirely driven by the GPU’s workload. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain more consistent regardless of the graphics settings. The fact that the FPS scales so dramatically with visual quality confirms that the Ryzen 5 5600F is not the limiting component. Its high percentile ranking and robust core configuration mean it has significant headroom, but the Intel Arc B390’s low performance prevents this CPU from delivering higher frame rates in this specific pairing.