Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
163
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 163 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 93 113 139
1440p QHD 93 150 182 223
1080p Full HD 131 209 255 312

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 139
3840x2160 Medium 113
3840x2160 High 93
3840x2160 Ultra 58
2560x1440 Low 223
2560x1440 Medium 182
2560x1440 High 150
2560x1440 Ultra 93
1920x1080 Low 312
1920x1080 Medium 255
1920x1080 High 209
1920x1080 Ultra 131

Downfall with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT pairing delivers a formidable 1080p and 1440p experience in Downfall, but the data reveals a steep performance cliff at 4K Ultra settings. This combination ranks in the top 23% of all tested configurations, with benchmark results showing a clear pattern where settings impact frame rates far more dramatically than resolution alone.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for this combo shows that Downfall scales with resolution in a predictable but steep manner, particularly at higher settings. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings drops the average frame rate from 209 FPS to 150 FPS, a reduction of 59 frames. Scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings continues this trend, with the average falling from 150 FPS to 93 FPS at 3840x2160. The overall scaling from 1080p High to 4K High represents a 116 FPS loss, indicating that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases.

At Low settings, the resolution scaling is even more pronounced in absolute terms. The combo produces 312 FPS at 1080p, 223 FPS at 1440p, and 139 FPS at 4K. This translates to an 89 FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p and an 84 FPS drop from 1440p to 4K. The near-linear scaling at Low settings suggests that the Radeon RX 9070 XT's raw rasterization throughput is being fully exercised, with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235's Arrow Lake architecture providing sufficient instruction throughput to avoid bottlenecking even at these high frame rates.

Medium settings present the most interesting scaling pattern, as this is the only preset tier with recorded minimum and maximum frame times. At 1080p Medium, the combo averages 255 FPS with a minimum of 217 FPS and maximum of 294 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 182 FPS with a 155 FPS minimum and 210 FPS maximum. The 4K Medium results show an average of 113 FPS with a 96 FPS minimum and 131 FPS maximum. The frame time variance expands slightly at higher resolutions, with the spread between minimum and maximum growing from 77 FPS at 1080p to 55 FPS at 1440p and 35 FPS at 4K.

Ultra settings reveal the most dramatic resolution penalty. The combo achieves 131 FPS at 1080p Ultra but falls to 93 FPS at 1440p Ultra and just 58 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 73 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K Ultra represents a 55.7% reduction in average frame rate, confirming that Ultra settings at 4K push the RX 9070 XT well beyond its comfort zone for this title. The data indicates that at 4K Ultra, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, as the CPU's 14 cores and 24 MB of shared L3 cache are unlikely to be the constraint at 58 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience for this combo depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, all settings tiers deliver playable frame rates, but the jump from High to Ultra costs 78 FPS on average (209 to 131). The Medium preset provides a compelling middle ground with 255 FPS average and a 217 FPS minimum, ensuring smooth gameplay even during demanding scenes. For competitive play at 1080p, Low settings at 312 FPS offer the highest headroom, but the visual fidelity loss may not justify the extra 57 FPS over Medium.

At 2560x1440, the High preset emerges as the sweet spot with 150 FPS average. Medium trails at 182 FPS, while Ultra drops to 93 FPS—still playable but approaching the threshold where frame time consistency becomes a concern. The Low preset at 223 FPS offers the highest performance but sacrifices the visual detail that makes the horror atmosphere of Downfall effective. The data suggests that High at 1440p provides the best balance, as the 150 FPS average leaves ample headroom above typical 144 Hz display refresh rates.

For 3840x2160, the recommendations shift dramatically. Ultra settings at 58 FPS average are technically playable but sit below the 60 FPS threshold that most users consider the minimum for smooth gameplay. High settings at 93 FPS provide a more comfortable margin, while Medium at 113 FPS is the strongest choice for 4K. Low settings at 139 FPS remain available for users prioritizing frame rate above all else, but the visual compromise at 4K resolution negates much of the benefit of running at this pixel density.

The Medium preset across all three resolutions shows the most consistent scaling behavior, with the 1080p to 1440p drop of 73 FPS and the 1440p to 4K drop of 69 FPS being nearly symmetrical. This consistency suggests that the combo's performance at Medium is well-balanced between CPU and GPU utilization, making it the most predictable settings tier for users who adjust resolution without changing presets.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT plays the dominant role in Downfall's performance profile, particularly as resolution and settings increase. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves adequate for all tested configurations—even at 4K Ultra, the frame rate limitation appears to stem from compute throughput rather than memory capacity. The RX 9070 XT's 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units provide the raw geometry and pixel processing power that Downfall demands at higher settings.

The GPU's clock behavior further explains the measured results. With a base clock of 1660 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2970 MHz, the RX 9070 XT demonstrates significant dynamic frequency scaling. The 1310 MHz gap between base and boost clocks indicates that thermal and power headroom substantially influence real-world performance. In Downfall, the scaling from 1080p Ultra (131 FPS) to 4K Ultra (58 FPS) suggests that the GPU sustains higher clocks at lower resolutions where the workload is less intense, while at 4K the sustained load likely drives clocks down toward the game clock frequency.

The GPU's RDNA 4.0 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process node packs 53,900 million transistors into a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². This density allows the RX 9070 XT to maintain high throughput while keeping the 304 W TDP within the bounds of a dual-slot cooler with two 8-pin power connectors. The 48.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute throughput provides ample headroom for the horror game's visual effects, and the 64 ray tracing cores contribute to the game's lighting and shadow calculations at Ultra settings.

The PassMark G3D score of 26,795 for this GPU places it in the 55th percentile among all tested GPUs, which aligns with the measured Downfall performance showing playable frame rates at 1440p High but struggling at 4K Ultra. The GPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Radeon HD 7770M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570, though these comparisons reflect the average benchmark score of 13,543 rather than game-specific performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce 312 FPS average, making this the only configuration in the entire dataset to exceed 300 FPS. Medium settings follow at 255 FPS average, with a measured minimum of 217 FPS and maximum of 294 FPS. High settings achieve 209 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 131 FPS average. The 181 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p demonstrates the significant impact of settings on this GPU-bound scenario.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance hierarchy remains consistent but with reduced absolute values. Low settings produce 223 FPS average, Medium achieves 182 FPS (minimum 155, maximum 210), High reaches 150 FPS, and Ultra falls to 93 FPS. The 130 FPS delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is smaller than at 1080p, indicating that resolution scaling is compressing the settings-based performance differences as the GPU becomes more heavily loaded.

At 3840x2160, the combo shows its limitations. Low settings still manage 139 FPS average, which is respectable for 4K gaming. Medium produces 113 FPS (minimum 96, maximum 131), High achieves 93 FPS, and Ultra drops to 58 FPS. The 81 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is the narrowest across all resolutions, confirming that at this pixel count, even the lowest settings cannot fully relieve the GPU bottleneck.

The Medium preset is the only tier with complete frame time data across all three resolutions. At 1080p, the minimum of 217 FPS represents 85.1% of the 255 FPS average, indicating tight frame pacing. At 1440p, the minimum of 155 FPS is 85.2% of the 182 FPS average, showing similar consistency. At 4K, the minimum of 96 FPS is 85.0% of the 113 FPS average, suggesting that the combo maintains stable frame delivery regardless of resolution when using Medium settings.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT ranks 667th out of 2,928 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the 77.2nd percentile of all configurations. This ranking reflects the combo's strong performance at lower resolutions and settings, tempered by its struggles at 4K Ultra. The top 23% placement indicates that this pairing outperforms the majority of tested systems, but there is meaningful headroom for higher-end combinations to achieve better results.

The CPU's individual benchmark performance shows it sits in the 89th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 46,062. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (0.1% faster), Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.1% slower), AMD EPYC 4364P (0.2% faster), and AMD EPYC 7303 (0.2% faster). These narrow margins confirm that the Core Ultra 5 235 is a mid-pack performer in synthetic CPU tests, providing adequate but not exceptional processing power for Downfall's AI and physics calculations.

The GPU's individual performance places it in the 55th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 13,543. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (0.1% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (0.2% faster), NVIDIA P106-090 (0.5% faster), and AMD Radeon Pro 555 (1% faster). The GPU's percentile ranking is notably lower than the CPU's, suggesting that the RX 9070 XT is the weaker link in this pairing for Downfall specifically, despite its strong rasterization specs on paper.

The discrepancy between the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 55th percentile rankings explains the combo's overall 77th percentile placement in Downfall. The game's performance appears to be more GPU-bound than CPU-bound, which aligns with the measured FPS scaling patterns showing significant drops at higher resolutions and settings. For users seeking to improve this combo's ranking, upgrading the GPU would likely yield larger performance gains than upgrading the CPU.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Downfall?*

A: Based on the measured data, 2560x1440 at High settings provides the best balance with 150 FPS average. At 4K, the combo drops to 93 FPS at High settings, while 1080p High achieves 209 FPS but may be limited by the CPU at such high frame rates.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Downfall?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Medium, the combo averages 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS, which is playable. At 4K High, it averages 93 FPS. However, 4K Ultra averages just 58 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

Q: How much performance does Ultra settings cost compared to High?

A: Across all resolutions, Ultra settings cost significant frame rates. At 1080p, the drop from High to Ultra is 78 FPS (209 to 131). At 1440p, the drop is 57 FPS (150 to 93). At 4K, the drop is 35 FPS (93 to 58).

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this combo?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The RX 9070 XT ranks in the 55th percentile among GPUs, while the Core Ultra 5 235 ranks in the 89th percentile among CPUs. The consistent frame rate drops at 4K Ultra confirm GPU limitation.

Q: What are the minimum frame rates for this combo?

A: Minimum frame rates are only recorded for Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 217 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it is 155 FPS. At 4K Medium, it is 96 FPS. All other settings tiers lack minimum FPS data in the measurements.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 667th out of 2,928 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the top 23% of all configurations. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (0.1% faster), while the GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (0.1% faster).

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2970 MHz MHz
TDP 304 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 139.0
3840x2160 Medium 113.0
3840x2160 High 93.0
3840x2160 Ultra 58.0
2560x1440 Low 223.0
2560x1440 Medium 182.0
2560x1440 High 150.0
2560x1440 Ultra 93.0
1920x1080 Low 312.0
1920x1080 Medium 255.0
1920x1080 High 209.0
1920x1080 Ultra 131.0

Downfall with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RX 9070 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.