Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B580 reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p with High settings, the combo produces an average of 388 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops that average to 267 FPS, a reduction of approximately 31%. The jump to 4K yields an average of 158 FPS, which is another 41% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep decline indicates that the rendering load is scaling heavily with pixel count, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario at these higher resolutions.

The pattern holds across all settings presets. For instance, at Low settings, the average FPS falls from 527 at 1080p to 363 at 1440p and then to 214 at 4K. At Medium settings, the averages are 449, 309, and 182 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, respectively. The Ultra preset similarly scales down from 332 FPS at 1080p to 228 FPS at 1440p and 135 FPS at 4K.

This scaling behavior suggests that at 1080p, the system is likely not fully saturating the GPU's capabilities, as the frame rates are exceptionally high. However, the consistent and large percentage drops at each higher resolution step point to the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor as the pixel workload increases. The data shows that the Intel Arc B580's rendering pipeline is being taxed more heavily at 4K, where the average FPS across all settings remains well above 100, but the margin for maintaining ultra-high refresh rates narrows considerably.

The difference between the Low and Ultra presets at each resolution is also telling. At 1080p, the gap is 195 FPS, with Low at 527 and Ultra at 332. This gap widens to 135 FPS at 1440p and narrows to 79 FPS at 4K. The narrowing gap at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU's compute and memory resources are becoming the dominant constraint, making the difference in settings less impactful on the final frame rate. This is a classic sign of a system transitioning from a balanced load at lower resolutions to a GPU-bound state at 4K.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its benchmark results, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13593 and a single-core score of 1919, place it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. This level of single-thread performance is crucial for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, a title known for being sensitive to CPU speed.

In this specific combo, the CPU's role appears to be providing a solid foundation that does not bottleneck the GPU at high frame rates. The data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the average FPS reaches 527, which is an extremely high number. For the CPU to feed the GPU enough data to achieve this, its single-core performance must be adequate. The Geekbench single-core score of 1460 and 3DMark single-thread score of 726 indicate a capable processor for this task.

However, the CPU's influence becomes less apparent as the resolution increases. At 4K, the average FPS drops to 214 on Low settings, which is a significant reduction from the 1080p figure. This suggests that while the CPU can handle the game logic and draw calls at lower resolutions, the GPU's rendering speed becomes the limiting factor at higher pixel counts. The CPU is likely not the primary bottleneck at 4K, as the frame rate is more heavily influenced by the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth.

The processor's 8 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support provide adequate bandwidth for feeding the GPU. The data does not show any signs of severe CPU stuttering or frame pacing issues, as the minimum FPS recorded at Medium settings across all resolutions is reasonably close to the average. For example, at 4K Medium, the minimum FPS is 155 against an average of 182, and at 1080p Medium, the minimum is 381 against an average of 449. This consistency indicates that the CPU is maintaining stable performance without major drops.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. Its core clocks are listed at 2670 MHz for both base and boost. In terms of raw compute, it offers 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s. These specifications suggest a GPU designed for high-throughput rendering, which aligns with the measured FPS data.

The GPU's role in this combo is to deliver the high frame rates seen in the benchmarks. The data indicates that the Arc B580 is the dominant component in determining performance, particularly at higher resolutions. Its 12 GB of VRAM is likely sufficient for CS:GO at all tested settings, as the game is not known for being VRAM-hungry. The memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s is a substantial resource that helps maintain performance at 4K, where the average FPS remains above 135 on the Ultra preset.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 23021. Its performance is closely matched to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, based on the deltaPct values of -0.2% and 0.6%, respectively. This context shows that the Arc B580 is a mid-to-high-tier performer, which is reflected in its ability to push high frame rates in CS:GO.

The scaling pattern observed across resolutions is a direct result of the GPU's workload. At 1080p, the GPU is not fully utilized, allowing for frame rates as high as 527 FPS on Low settings. As resolution increases, the GPU's shading units, TMUs, and ROPs are more heavily taxed, causing the frame rate to drop. The Ultra preset at 4K, with an average of 135 FPS, shows that the GPU is still capable of providing a playable experience, but it is clearly working harder to do so compared to 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 527 on Low to 332 on Ultra. The Medium preset records an average of 449 FPS with a minimum of 381 and a maximum of 516. The High preset yields 388 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors with ease, even at the highest settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 363 on Low, 309 on Medium, 267 on High, and 228 on Ultra. The Medium preset again provides the only min/max data, with a minimum of 262 and a maximum of 355 FPS. This shows that at 1440p, the system still delivers excellent performance, comfortably above the 144 Hz threshold for most monitors on all but the Ultra preset, which remains well above 200 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more moderate. The Low preset averages 214 FPS, Medium averages 182 FPS with a minimum of 155 and a maximum of 210, High averages 158 FPS, and Ultra averages 135 FPS. While these numbers are lower than at 1080p and 1440p, they are still highly playable for a competitive title like CS:GO. Even the Ultra preset at 4K maintains an average above 135 FPS, which is sufficient for smooth gameplay on standard 60 Hz displays and is close to the threshold for 144 Hz monitors.

The data shows a consistent trend: the difference between settings presets is most pronounced at 1080p and diminishes at 4K. This is because the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck at higher resolutions, making the relative cost of higher quality settings less impactful on the overall frame rate. The minimum FPS figures, where available, suggest good frame pacing, with no severe drops indicating potential stuttering.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 388.

Q: How does the performance at 4K Ultra compare to 1080p Ultra?

A: The average FPS at 4K Ultra is 135, while at 1080p Ultra it is 332. This represents a significant drop of approximately 59% when moving to the higher resolution.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p Low settings?

A: At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 527. Given that the GPU's performance scaling is steep at higher resolutions, it is likely that the CPU is playing a more significant role at this low resolution, as the GPU is less taxed.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The minimum FPS recorded at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 262, with an average of 309 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580's performance compare to its rivals?

A: Based on average benchmark scores, the Arc B580 is 0.2% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and 0.6% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, according to the nearestRivals data.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in this game among tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 2781 out of 3719 tested combinations in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p monitor, the High preset provides an average of 388 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate display. The Ultra preset, at 332 FPS, also offers an excellent experience with minimal visual compromise. The data shows that even at 1080p Ultra, the system maintains a very high frame rate, so users can prioritize visual quality without significant performance loss.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 267 FPS, which is ideal for 240 Hz monitors. The Medium preset, at 309 FPS, is also a strong choice for those seeking maximum frame rates, as it offers a significant boost over High while likely maintaining good visual fidelity. The Ultra preset, with 228 FPS, is still playable on high-refresh-rate screens, but the performance gain from dropping to High is noticeable.

For 4K resolution, the data suggests that the Low preset, with an average of 214 FPS, is the best option for competitive play, as it maximizes the frame rate. The Medium preset, at 182 FPS, offers a good balance between visual quality and performance. The High and Ultra presets, at 158 and 135 FPS respectively, are viable for 60 Hz displays, but they may not be ideal for fast-paced competitive play where higher frame rates are advantageous. The recommendation is to use the Medium preset at 4K for a good balance, or Low if frame rate is the absolute priority.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2781 out of 3719 tested combos in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. This places the system in the lower half of all tested configurations, specifically in the 25th percentile of performance. While the measured FPS numbers are high in absolute terms, the ranking indicates that many other CPU-GPU pairings are capable of producing even higher frame rates in this game.

The rank is a reflection of the combo's overall performance relative to the full database of systems. The CPU, while having a solid single-core score, is not a top-tier processor. Its 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs shows it is above average but not elite. Similarly, the GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is a solid mid-range performer. When combined, they achieve high frame rates, but not the absolute highest possible.

The data suggests that this combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, where it delivers excellent results. At 4K, it still provides a playable experience, but it is not among the top performers. The rank of 2781 out of 3719 highlights that while the combo is capable, there are many other systems that can extract more performance from CS:GO, likely due to more powerful CPUs or GPUs. Nonetheless, for the target resolutions of 1080p and 1440p, this pairing offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU performance, as evidenced by the high average FPS figures.