Barony

# Barony with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + Intel Arc B580

Barony is a roguelike title from 2015, and the measured performance data for this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B580 reveals a system that can handle the game with considerable headroom at most settings. The combo ranks 2789th out of 3717 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database, yet the actual frame rates tell a story of a pairing that is more than adequate for Barony's demands. The data shows a system where the GPU is likely the primary driver of performance, given the CPU's modest single-thread scores and the game's relatively light overall load, though the CPU's six cores and twelve threads ensure no bottlenecks at typical gaming resolutions.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, specifically the Renoir die, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP on the AMD Socket AM4 platform. The CPU's cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Its memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The processor also integrates Radeon Vega 7 graphics, though in this configuration it works alongside the discrete Intel Arc B580.

For Barony, the CPU's single-thread performance appears to be the more critical factor, and the benchmark data shows a 3dmark_single_thread score of 726 and a passmark_single_thread score of 2653. These scores suggest that the processor is not exceptionally strong in lightly-threaded workloads, which matters because roguelike games often rely on a few threads for game logic, AI, and procedural generation. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are more robust, with 3dmark_max_threads at 4889 and cinebench_r23_multicore at 13593, but Barony is unlikely to leverage all 12 threads effectively given its genre and release date. The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 71 indicates it performs better than 71% of all CPUs in the database, yet its nearest rivals—such as the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE with an average score of 17482 (0.1% delta) and the Intel Core 7 150U with 17395 (0.6% delta)—are similarly positioned, confirming it sits in a mid-range tier.

Looking at the measured FPS data, the CPU does not appear to be the limiting factor at any resolution. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 277 FPS average, which is a very high frame rate that would stress even strong CPUs, yet the system achieves it without apparent issues. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 42 FPS, but this is more likely due to GPU load rather than CPU limitations, since the frame rate scales consistently with resolution and settings changes. The CPU's boost clock of 4.20 GHz is adequate for maintaining high frame rates in a game like Barony, which is not known for heavy physics or complex simulations. The data implies that the Ryzen 5 4600G provides sufficient processing power for this title, with headroom to spare even when paired with a capable discrete GPU.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B580 is a graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, specifically the Battlemage generation, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 20 ray tracing cores. The card has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. Its clocks are set at a base of 2670 MHz and boost of 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The GPU's FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. The card has a TDP of 190 W and requires a 450 W suggested PSU, connecting via PCIe 4.0 x8.

For Barony, the GPU's role becomes increasingly important as resolution and settings rise. The card's 12 GB VRAM is far more than this game needs, given its 2015 release and lightweight textures, so memory capacity is not a concern. The GPU's benchmark scores show a passmark_g3d score of 15748 and a geekbench_vulkan score of 109672, indicating solid DirectX and Vulkan performance. The GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 68 means it outperforms 68% of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with an average score of 23061 (-0.2% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with 22895 (0.6% delta), which suggests the Arc B580 performs in a similar bracket to these older, well-known cards.

The measured FPS data shows that the GPU scales predictably with settings. At 1080p Low, the card delivers 277 FPS average, but this drops to 127 FPS at 1080p Ultra, showing a 54% reduction from Low to Ultra. At 1440p, the averages range from 175 FPS at Low to 80 FPS at Ultra, and at 4K, they range from 91 FPS at Low to 42 FPS at Ultra. The GPU is clearly the performance limiter at higher settings, as the CPU can maintain high frame rates at lower settings, but the card's capabilities are taxed more heavily as resolution and graphical fidelity increase. The 4K Ultra result of 42 FPS suggests that Ultra settings at 4K are not ideal for this GPU in Barony, while 1080p and 1440p provide much smoother experiences.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p High settings for this combo?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 177 FPS, which is a very smooth experience for Barony. This is significantly higher than the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the system has ample performance headroom at this resolution and settings level.

Q: How does the combo rank compared to other tested systems in Barony?

A: The combo ranks 2789th out of 3717 tested combinations, placing it in the 75th percentile of all tested systems. While this rank might seem low, the actual frame rates are quite playable, suggesting that the ranking is influenced by many high-end systems in the database rather than any deficiency in this pairing.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 175 FPS at Low settings to 80 FPS at Ultra settings, a reduction of 95 FPS or 54%. This shows that Ultra settings impose a significant load on the Intel Arc B580, but the frame rate remains above 60 FPS, making it still playable.

Q: Does the CPU's integrated graphics affect performance in this setup?

A: The CPU includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, but in this configuration with the discrete Intel Arc B580, the integrated GPU is not used for rendering. The measured FPS data reflects only the discrete GPU's performance, and the CPU's processing power is what matters for game logic and physics.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows a minimum FPS of 175 at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with an average of 206 FPS and a maximum of 237 FPS. This indicates that even in the most demanding moments, the frame rate never drops below 175 FPS, providing a very stable experience.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, scores 23061, a delta of -0.2%. This means the Arc B580 is essentially on par with the RX 580 2048SP in overall benchmark performance, though actual in-game results may vary.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this pairing in Barony is 2789 out of 3717 tested combinations, which positions it in the lower third of all systems in the database. This rank is likely influenced by the CPU's mid-range standing—the Ryzen 5 4600G has a percentileVsAllCpus of 71—and the GPU's similar position, with a percentileVsAllGpus of 68. However, the ranking does not reflect the actual gaming experience, as the measured FPS data shows that this system can achieve very high frame rates at most settings.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has an average score of 17482 with a delta of 0.1%, meaning the Ryzen 5 4600G performs nearly identically to that chip. The Intel Core 7 150U scores 17395 (0.6% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 17614 (-0.6% delta), all within a tight band. This suggests that the CPU is solidly mid-pack, and its ranking in the combo is not due to any outlier weakness. For the GPU, the nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061 (-0.2% delta), followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.6% delta) and the RTX 3080 at 23172 (-0.7% delta). The Arc B580 sits right between the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in benchmark scores, which is notable given the generational differences.

The combo rank of 2789 means that about 928 other tested combinations perform better in Barony, but many of those likely feature high-end CPUs and GPUs that are overkill for this game. The data implies that the limiting factor for this combo's rank is not the hardware's raw capability but rather the presence of more powerful systems in the database. For a 2015 roguelike, this pairing delivers frame rates that far exceed playability thresholds at 1080p and 1440p, making the rank somewhat misleading in terms of real-world usability.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo depends on the resolution and the user's preference for frame rate versus visual quality. At 1080p, even Ultra settings deliver an average of 127 FPS, which is well above the smooth 60 FPS threshold. The Low setting at 1080p reaches 277 FPS, while Medium achieves 206 FPS and High hits 177 FPS. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors, Medium or High settings at 1080p offer the best balance, providing frame rates above 170 FPS while maintaining reasonable visual fidelity.

At 1440p, the choices become more nuanced. Low settings yield 175 FPS, Medium gives 130 FPS, and High provides 112 FPS, all of which are smooth. Ultra at 1440p drops to 80 FPS, which is still playable but begins to approach the edge of what some users might consider optimal. For a balance between visual quality and performance, High settings at 1440p are recommended, as they offer a solid 112 FPS average with better graphics than Medium or Low.

At 4K, the data shows that Ultra settings are not ideal, with an average of 42 FPS that dips below the 60 FPS threshold. High settings at 4K produce 58 FPS, which is borderline, while Medium reaches 68 FPS with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS. Low settings at 4K achieve 91 FPS, making it the only 4K setting that provides a clearly smooth experience. For 4K users, Low or Medium settings are recommended, with Medium offering a better visual experience at a still-acceptable 68 FPS average. Overall, the sweet spot for this combo is 1080p High or 1440p High, where the system delivers high frame rates without sacrificing too much graphical quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the system delivers the following average frame rates: Low at 277 FPS, Medium at 206 FPS (with a minimum of 175 FPS and maximum of 237 FPS), High at 177 FPS, and Ultra at 127 FPS. These numbers show a clear progression where each increase in settings reduces performance by approximately 50-70 FPS, with the largest drop occurring between Low and Medium.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 175 FPS, Medium at 130 FPS (minimum 111 FPS, maximum 150 FPS), High at 112 FPS, and Ultra at 80 FPS. The pattern is similar to 1080p, but the absolute numbers are lower, reflecting the increased pixel count. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 95 FPS, which is slightly less than the 150 FPS gap at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 91 FPS, Medium at 68 FPS (minimum 58 FPS, maximum 78 FPS), High at 58 FPS, and Ultra at 42 FPS. This is the most demanding resolution, and the data shows that only Low settings maintain a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium offers a playable 68 FPS average, but High and Ultra fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra dipping to 42 FPS. The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings at each resolution, showing 175 FPS at 1080p, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 4K, which indicates that frame pacing is generally stable but can dip at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about which component is limiting performance. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 277 at 1080p to 175 at 1440p (a 37% drop) and then to 91 at 4K (a 48% drop from 1440p, or 67% from 1080p). This scaling suggests that at Low settings, the CPU is still contributing significantly to frame rates, as the GPU is not heavily taxed, but the resolution increase still impacts performance as the GPU must render more pixels.

At Medium settings, the progression is 206 FPS at 1080p, 130 FPS at 1440p (a 37% drop), and 68 FPS at 4K (a 48% drop from 1440p, or 67% from 1080p). This is nearly identical to the Low setting scaling, indicating that the GPU is handling the increased load similarly across resolutions. At High settings, the numbers are 177 FPS at 1080p, 112 FPS at 1440p (a 37% drop), and 58 FPS at 4K (a 48% drop from 1440p, or 67% from 1080p). The consistent percentage drops across settings suggest that the scaling is resolution-driven rather than settings-driven.

At Ultra settings, the progression is 127 FPS at 1080p, 80 FPS at 1440p (a 37% drop), and 42 FPS at 4K (a 48% drop from 1440p, or 67% from 1080p). Again, the same percentage pattern emerges. This uniformity indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor across all settings, as the relative performance drop from 1080p to 4K is consistent regardless of graphical load. The CPU's role is less prominent, as its performance does not appear to bottleneck at any resolution, given that the frame rates scale smoothly with resolution changes. The data implies that the Intel Arc B580's memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s and pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s are the key factors in determining 4K performance, while the CPU's six cores and 3.70 GHz base clock are sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at high frame rates.