Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

AVERAGE FPS
217
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 217 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 74 102 134 162
1440p QHD 138 180 242 290
1080p Full HD 210 272 364 436

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 162
3840x2160 Medium 134
3840x2160 High 102
3840x2160 Ultra 74
2560x1440 Low 290
2560x1440 Medium 242
2560x1440 High 180
2560x1440 Ultra 138
1920x1080 Low 436
1920x1080 Medium 364
1920x1080 High 272
1920x1080 Ultra 210

Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis

Counter-Strike 2 is a title where frame rate is king, and the combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a data set that reveals a clear hierarchy between CPU and GPU limits. The measured FPS across resolutions and settings confirms this pairing is exceptionally strong for competitive play, though the margins between presets narrow significantly as resolution climbs.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and tells a classic story about where the bottleneck lies. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 436.2 FPS, but at 3840x2160 with Low settings, that figure falls to 161.8 FPS — a 63% reduction. This dramatic scaling indicates that at 1080p, the RTX 3070 is not the limiting factor; the CPU is working hard to feed frames, and the GPU has ample headroom. The data shows that moving from 1080p Low to 1440p Low only drops the average from 436.2 to 289.9 FPS, a 34% decrease, which still leaves plenty of performance for high-refresh monitors.

At High settings, the pattern shifts. The 1080p result is 272.1 FPS, while 1440p yields 180 FPS and 4K drops to 102.4 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings is a 43% loss, which is more moderate than the Low setting drop. This suggests that as visual fidelity increases, the GPU begins to take on a more significant role, but the CPU remains strong enough to avoid severe stutters even at 4K. The Ultra preset tells the most interesting story: 1080p Ultra hits 210 FPS, 1440p Ultra is 138.1 FPS, and 4K Ultra falls to 74.4 FPS. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is 65%, very similar to the Low preset drop, implying that the game's Ultra settings impose a consistent load that scales almost linearly with pixel count, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured data places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at rank 720 out of 1632 tested combos for Counter-Strike 2. That places it in the upper-middle tier of all combinations, which is a nuanced position. While the raw FPS numbers are high, the rank indicates that many other pairings — likely those with newer or more powerful GPUs — can push even higher frame rates. The combo's rank is not a reflection of weakness but rather of the competitive field; the RTX 3070 is an older GPU, and its 72nd percentile among all GPUs means it sits above average but not at the top. The CPU, however, is a strong performer, ranking in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47282.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals shows a tight cluster. The Intel Core i7-13700KF scores 47334, a delta of -0.1%, while the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 47131, a delta of 0.3%. The Intel Core i9-12900F is nearly identical at 47081, a 0.4% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 leads slightly at 47527, a -0.5% delta. These sub-1% differences mean the choice of CPU among these rivals has almost no impact on the overall combo ranking for this game. The GPU's nearest rivals tell a similar story: the AMD FirePro S7150 scores 28409 (-0.6%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 27985 (+0.9%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 27956 (+1%). The RTX 3070's average benchmark score of 28238 places it in a dead heat with these alternatives, suggesting that the combo's rank is more heavily influenced by other factors like driver optimization or memory bandwidth.

Settings Recommendations

Benchmark results indicate that the Low preset is the clear choice for maximizing competitive advantage, but it comes with a caveat about visual clarity. At 1080p Low, the 436.2 FPS average is far beyond what any current display can show, making it a theoretical maximum rather than a practical target. The Medium preset at 1080p offers 363.6 FPS, which still exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end monitors, and it likely provides better visibility of enemy models. For 1440p users, Low at 289.9 FPS is the best bet for pure responsiveness, while Medium at 242.1 FPS remains excellent and may be more visually comfortable for long sessions.

The High preset is a balanced option, delivering 272.1 FPS at 1080p and 180 FPS at 1440p, both of which are playable on 144Hz or 165Hz panels. However, the data suggests that Ultra is not worth the cost. At 1080p Ultra, the average drops to 210 FPS, and at 1440p it falls to 138.1 FPS, which is below the threshold for 144Hz monitors. At 4K, Ultra's 74.4 FPS is barely acceptable for casual play but poor for a competitive shooter. The recommendation based on the measured rows is to prioritize Low or Medium at 1080p or 1440p, with High as a fallback if visual fidelity is more important than raw frame rate.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured averages provides a detailed map of performance. At 1920x1080, the Low preset leads with 436.2 FPS, followed by Medium at 363.6 FPS, High at 272.1 FPS, and Ultra at 210 FPS. The 1440p results show Low at 289.9 FPS, Medium at 242.1 FPS, High at 180 FPS, and Ultra at 138.1 FPS. At 4K, the order remains consistent but the gaps widen: Low at 161.8 FPS, Medium at 134.2 FPS, High at 102.4 FPS, and Ultra at 74.4 FPS.

These numbers reveal that the difference between Low and Medium is relatively small at 1080p (436.2 vs. 363.6, a 20% gap) but grows at 4K (161.8 vs. 134.2, a 21% gap). The jump from Medium to High is larger, costing about 25% of the frame rate at 1080p and 24% at 4K. The most punishing transition is from High to Ultra, which loses 23% of FPS at 1080p and 27% at 4K. This pattern suggests that Ultra settings introduce effects that disproportionately tax the GPU, while the CPU remains capable of sustaining high frame rates even at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a critical piece of this puzzle, and its specifications explain the scaling behavior. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, the GPU delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for Counter-Strike 2 at all tested resolutions, but the 4K Ultra results suggest that the GPU's compute capabilities, not memory, are the bottleneck. The GPU's boost clock is 1725 MHz, and its 5888 shading units provide 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. These figures indicate a capable mid-range card that can handle 1080p and 1440p with ease but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 28238, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (scoring 27985) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (scoring 27956), are within 1% of its performance. This tight grouping suggests that the RTX 3070 does not have a unique advantage in this game; rather, the CPU is what boosts the combo. The GPU's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores are largely irrelevant for Counter-Strike 2, which does not heavily utilize ray tracing or DLSS in the measured presets, so the raw rasterization performance is what matters.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS measured for this combo?

A: The highest average is 436.2 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations for Counter-Strike 2?

A: It ranks 720 out of 1632 total combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU is more likely the limiting factor at 1080p, as the FPS drops significantly when moving to 1440p, indicating the GPU has headroom.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low achieves 289.9 FPS while Ultra achieves 138.1 FPS, a difference of 151.8 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 3070's 8 GB memory limit performance at 4K?

A: The measured results show 4K High at 102.4 FPS and 4K Ultra at 74.4 FPS, which suggests the GPU's compute power, not memory capacity, is the primary constraint.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700K compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Core i7-13700K scores 47282, which is within 0.5% of its closest rivals, including the AMD EPYC 4364P (47131) and the Intel Core i9-12900F (47081).

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-13700K is the anchor of this pairing, and its specifications are tailored for high-FPS gaming. With 16 cores and 24 threads, the CPU has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, allowing it to handle the single-threaded nature of Counter-Strike 2's engine with ease. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache is another asset, reducing latency for frequently accessed game data. The CPU's benchmark results back this up: a single-thread score of 1136 in 3DMark and a 5505 in Cinebench R23 single-core, both of which are strong indicators of gaming performance.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores are equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39000 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 17731. These numbers are far beyond what Counter-Strike 2 requires, meaning the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck except at very low resolutions and settings where the GPU is idle. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47282, places it just 0.1% behind the Core i7-13700KF and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. This margin is negligible, so the CPU choice is not a differentiator in this combo. Instead, the data shows that the Core i7-13700K provides a solid foundation that allows the RTX 3070 to reach its full potential at 1080p and 1440p, while at 4K, the GPU's limitations become the primary constraint.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-13700K

Cores / Threads 16 / 24
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1725 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Counter-Strike 2

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 161.8
3840x2160 Medium 134.2
3840x2160 High 102.4
3840x2160 Ultra 74.4
2560x1440 Low 289.9
2560x1440 Medium 242.1
2560x1440 High 180.0
2560x1440 Ultra 138.1
1920x1080 Low 436.2
1920x1080 Medium 363.6
1920x1080 High 272.1
1920x1080 Ultra 210.0

Counter-Strike 2 with ii7-13700K + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-13700K + RTX 3070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.