Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

AVERAGE FPS
161
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 161 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 74 99 120
1440p QHD 103 133 178 214
1080p Full HD 156 201 269 323

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 120
3840x2160 Medium 99
3840x2160 High 74
3840x2160 Ultra 58
2560x1440 Low 214
2560x1440 Medium 178
2560x1440 High 133
2560x1440 Ultra 103
1920x1080 Low 323
1920x1080 Medium 269
1920x1080 High 201
1920x1080 Ultra 156

Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis

Counter-Strike 2 is a game where the performance gap between resolutions reveals a classic tension between CPU and GPU workloads. For the Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600, the measured frames per second (FPS) drop is steep but not uniform across all settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 323 FPS, but dropping to 4K Low reduces that figure to 120 FPS, a reduction of 203 FPS. This is a substantial 62.8% loss, yet the absolute numbers remain high enough for competitive play. The pattern shifts when looking at the Ultra preset: 1080p delivers 156 FPS, while 4K falls to 58 FPS, a 98 FPS drop or 62.8% decrease. The consistency of this percentage drop across Low and Ultra suggests that the scaling is primarily driven by the resolution’s pixel count rather than the specific graphical workload.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor. The i7-13700K’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1136, allows the RX 7600 to stretch its legs, but the gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is only 167 FPS (323 vs 156). This is a smaller relative difference than at 4K, where Low and Ultra differ by 62 FPS (120 vs 58). At 4K, the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the bottleneck, as the RX 7600’s 2048 shading units are tasked with filling 8.3 million pixels per frame. The benchmark results suggest that the Radeon RX 7600 is not powerful enough to maintain the same frame rate headroom at 4K that it has at 1080p, even with a very capable CPU feeding it data.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for this combo shows that resolution scaling is heavily dependent on the settings preset. Looking at the Medium preset, which includes min and max FPS data, the transition from 1080p to 1440p sees the average FPS drop from 269 to 178, a 91 FPS decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the average falls further to 99 FPS, another 79 FPS drop. This progressive decline is linear in nature, suggesting that the RX 7600’s memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is being saturated as pixel count increases. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus is adequate for textures at these settings, but the bandwidth limits the fill rate.

The Low preset shows the most extreme scaling. At 1080p, the combo pushes 323 FPS, but this drops to 214 FPS at 1440p and 120 FPS at 4K. The 4K figure is still playable, but the 203 FPS difference between 1080p and 4K indicates that the GPU is the clear bottleneck at higher resolutions. Conversely, the Ultra preset shows the smallest absolute drop from 1080p to 4K (156 to 58 FPS), but the percentage drop is similar to Low. This suggests that Ultra settings introduce additional GPU load that scales with resolution, but the CPU’s role diminishes as the GPU becomes the primary constraint. Benchmark results indicate that for this specific pairing, 1080p is where the i7-13700K can fully express its capabilities, while 4K moves the workload squarely into the RX 7600’s domain.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a mid-range graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 33 chip. Its base clock is 1720 MHz, boosting up to 2655 MHz, and it features 32 ray tracing cores alongside 2048 shading units. In Counter-Strike 2, this hardware configuration yields a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310, which places it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows that the GPU’s clock speed, which can reach 2655 MHz under boost, is critical for maintaining high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the average of 323 FPS demonstrates that the GPU can keep up with the CPU’s output, but at 4K Ultra, the 58 FPS average indicates the GPU is overwhelmed.

The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is sufficient for Counter-Strike 2 at these settings, as the game does not appear to exceed this limit based on the measured results. However, the memory bus width of 128 bit and bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s become limiting factors at higher resolutions. The pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s are modest figures, and the data reflects this in the 4K results. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 15171 is close to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, which scores 15199, a delta of -0.2%. This close competition suggests that the RX 7600 is positioned to deliver similar performance to that card, but in this specific game, the driver optimization and architecture play a significant role. The measured FPS at 1440p Ultra (103 FPS) shows that the GPU can handle competitive resolutions well, but it is not a 4K powerhouse.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 2543 out of 3719 combos for Counter-Strike 2. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all possible configurations, which is surprising given the high FPS numbers achieved. The rank of 2543 indicates that while the combo delivers smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, there are many other combinations that achieve higher average FPS in this title. The i7-13700K is a high-end CPU, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, but the RX 7600’s 57th percentile GPU ranking drags down the overall combo performance.

The data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this ranking. The i7-13700K’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, has a similar average benchmark score of 46971, with a delta of -0.2%, indicating they are nearly identical in general compute. However, in Counter-Strike 2, the GPU’s role is more prominent. The combo’s rank of 2543 is likely due to the RX 7600’s modest performance relative to other GPUs that could be paired with this CPU. For context, the GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3050 OEM, has a delta of -0.2% in average benchmark score, but in-game performance can vary. The measured data shows that this combo is capable of high refresh rates at 1080p, but the rank suggests that other combos with more powerful GPUs will dominate. The percentile ranking of the CPU (89%) versus the GPU (57%) clearly indicates that the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve 144 Hz?

A: At 1440p with High settings, the combo averages 133 FPS, which is below 144 Hz. However, at 1080p with High settings, it averages 201 FPS, so 1080p is the resolution to target for 144 Hz monitors.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its closest rival in this game?

A: The RX 7600’s average benchmark score is 15171, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, a delta of -0.2%. In Counter-Strike 2, the measured FPS data shows the RX 7600 handles the game well, but this benchmark comparison suggests they are similar in overall compute.

Q: Is the i7-13700K bottlenecking the RX 7600 at 1080p?

A: No, the data indicates the CPU is not a bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 323 FPS, which is a very high frame rate. The i7-13700K’s single-thread score of 1136 in 3DMark supports that it can feed the GPU effectively.

Q: What is the performance drop from 1080p to 4K on Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 156, and at 4K Ultra, it drops to 58 FPS. This is a 98 FPS decrease, which represents a 62.8% reduction in performance.

Q: Does the combo have enough VRAM for 4K gaming?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The measured data at 4K shows playable frame rates on Low (120 FPS), but the game may not be fully utilizing the VRAM capacity, as the bottleneck appears to be bandwidth rather than capacity.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combos?

A: It ranks 2543 out of 3719 tested combinations for Counter-Strike 2, placing it in the lower-middle tier. This is because the GPU is a mid-range part, while the CPU is high-end.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache are substantial, and its 3DMark max-thread score of 12412 indicates strong multi-threaded performance. In Counter-Strike 2, the CPU’s role is to process game logic and draw calls, and the data shows it excels at this. The 1080p Low average of 323 FPS reflects the single-thread performance, as the game’s engine is known to be heavily single-threaded. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2116 and Geekbench single-core score of 2529 both support this.

The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it is faster than 89% of processors on the market. However, the combo’s in-game rank of 2543 out of 3719 shows that raw CPU power is not enough to compensate for the GPU’s limitations. The data reveals that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary driver of performance, as the FPS scales well with lower settings. At 4K, the CPU’s advantage is less pronounced because the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The i7-13700K’s memory support for DDR4 and DDR5, coupled with a dual-channel memory bus, allows for fast data transfer, which is crucial for feeding the GPU at high frame rates. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz is particularly effective in this game, as it provides the high single-thread speed necessary for maintaining high FPS in CPU-bound scenarios.

Settings Recommendations

For this combo, the measured data suggests that the High preset offers the best balance between visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p High, the average FPS of 201 is well above the 144 Hz threshold for competitive gaming, and even at 1440p High, the 133 FPS average is playable for most users. The Low preset, while delivering higher FPS (323 at 1080p), sacrifices visual fidelity, which may not be necessary given the High preset’s excellent results. The Ultra preset, on the other hand, pushes the GPU to its limits, with 1080p Ultra averaging 156 FPS and 1440p Ultra dropping to 103 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 58 FPS is below the 60 FPS target, making it less desirable.

The Medium preset provides a middle ground, with 269 FPS at 1080p and 178 FPS at 1440p, but the High preset is only 68 FPS slower at 1080p and 45 FPS slower at 1440p, while offering better visuals. The data implies that High is the sweet spot for this hardware. For users with 1080p monitors, High settings will provide a buttery-smooth experience. For 1440p users, High is still viable, but they may need to accept frame rates slightly below 144 Hz. The Low preset is recommended for extreme competitive play where maximum FPS is prioritized over visuals, but the High preset’s 201 FPS at 1080p is already sufficient for most esports scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo is comprehensive, covering three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 323 FPS, while Medium averages 269 FPS, High averages 201 FPS, and Ultra averages 156 FPS. The Medium preset provides min and max FPS data of 228 and 309, respectively, indicating good frame time consistency. At 2560x1440, Low averages 214 FPS, Medium averages 178 FPS (min 151, max 205), High averages 133 FPS, and Ultra averages 103 FPS. The 1440p results show a more pronounced drop when moving from Medium to High, a 45 FPS difference, compared to the 59 FPS drop from Low to Medium.

At 3840x2160, the performance is significantly lower. Low averages 120 FPS, Medium averages 99 FPS (min 84, max 114), High averages 74 FPS, and Ultra averages 58 FPS. The 4K data reveals that the RX 7600 is not designed for high-refresh-rate 4K gaming, as even the Low preset cannot maintain 144 FPS. The jump from 1440p to 4K is steepest on the High preset, where the average drops from 133 to 74 FPS, a 59 FPS decrease. The Ultra preset at 4K is only 58 FPS, which is marginal for smooth gameplay. The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is excellent, 1440p is good, and 4K is playable but not optimal for this combo. The Medium preset at 4K, with its 99 FPS average, is the most playable 4K option, but the High preset’s 74 FPS is a significant drop.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-13700K

Cores / Threads 16 / 24
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2655 MHz MHz
TDP 165 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Counter-Strike 2

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 120.0
3840x2160 Medium 99.0
3840x2160 High 74.0
3840x2160 Ultra 58.0
2560x1440 Low 214.0
2560x1440 Medium 178.0
2560x1440 High 133.0
2560x1440 Ultra 103.0
1920x1080 Low 323.0
1920x1080 Medium 269.0
1920x1080 High 201.0
1920x1080 Ultra 156.0

Counter-Strike 2 with ii7-13700K + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike 2 with RX 7600 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-13700K + RX 7600

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.