Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

AVERAGE FPS
89
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 89 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 41 55 66
1440p QHD 57 73 98 118
1080p Full HD 86 111 149 179

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 55
3840x2160 High 41
3840x2160 Ultra 32
2560x1440 Low 118
2560x1440 Medium 98
2560x1440 High 73
2560x1440 Ultra 57
1920x1080 Low 179
1920x1080 Medium 149
1920x1080 High 111
1920x1080 Ultra 86

Counter-Strike 2 with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis

Counter-Strike 2 is a fast-paced FPS where frame rate consistency directly impacts aiming and reaction time. The measured data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B390 reveals a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics component, making settings and resolution choices critical for achieving a playable experience. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy: lower settings and resolutions yield dramatically higher frame rates, while the gap between presets widens as resolution increases, pointing to the GPU as the primary bottleneck in nearly every scenario.

Settings Recommendations

For this specific combination, the choice of settings is the single most important factor in determining playability. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 179 FPS, which is the highest recorded frame rate for this combo. This is the only preset at this resolution that breaks past the 144Hz refresh rate mark, making it the definitive choice for competitive play. The Medium preset at 1080p provides a still-respectable 149 FPS average, with a minimum of 126 FPS, which remains above the 120Hz threshold for many monitors. However, the data shows a steep performance cliff when moving to High (111 FPS) and an even more severe drop to Ultra (86 FPS). Given that Counter-Strike 2 is a title where visual fidelity is secondary to responsiveness, the Low preset is the optimal choice for this hardware, as it maximizes the frame rate headroom and minimizes input latency.

At 1440p, the situation becomes more demanding. The Low preset still manages an average of 118 FPS, which is playable for most users but falls short of high-refresh-rate targets. The Medium preset drops to 98 FPS, and the High preset yields 73 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is nearly unplayable, with an average of just 57 FPS. For users who prioritize visual quality over maximum frame rate, the Medium preset at 1440p offers a balanced experience, but the data strongly suggests that 1080p Low is the sweet spot for this GPU. The 4K results are largely academic for this combo, as even the Low preset at 3840x2160 only achieves 66 FPS, and the High preset falls to 41 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K produces a slideshow-like 32 FPS average. Therefore, the recommendation is clear: for competitive play, use 1080p with Low settings; for a more visually rich experience, 1440p with Medium settings is the highest acceptable tier before frame rates become too inconsistent.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The CPU's defining feature is its large 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is typical of the X3D series and is designed to reduce memory latency in gaming workloads. The processor supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14317 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11765, while single-thread performance is also solid, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2017.

In the context of Counter-Strike 2, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and handle game logic. The data from this combo suggests that the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is not the limiting factor. The average FPS scales directly with resolution and settings, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. For instance, at 1080p Low, the system produces 179 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 66 FPS — a massive reduction that cannot be attributed to CPU load, as the resolution change does not significantly alter CPU workload. The CPU's 16 threads and high boost clock are more than sufficient to maintain frame rates well above 200 FPS in this engine, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate ceiling is consistently capped by the GPU's rendering capabilities. The processor's average benchmark score of 27896 places it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, and it performs nearly identically to the Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, with delta percentages of 0.1% and 0% respectively. This level of performance confirms that the CPU is a high-end part that will not hold back the system in this title, even at lower resolutions where CPU load is relatively higher.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, manufactured on Intel's 3 nm process. It features 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. The GPU clock speeds are listed with a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2500 MHz. Its memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, meaning it uses a portion of the system's DDR4 RAM, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." The GPU's theoretical performance is rated at 7.680 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has a TDP of 80 W and is an active production part.

The benchmark results for this GPU are stark, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of just 1482. This score places the Arc B390 in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and GT 625 OEM, which are entry-level parts from a decade ago. The delta percentages against these rivals are small, ranging from 1.3% to 2.7%, indicating that the Arc B390 is at the very bottom of the performance spectrum. In Counter-Strike 2, this translates to the frame rates seen in the measured data. The GPU is the undisputed bottleneck across all tested configurations. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 179 FPS, which is a playable number, but the GPU's limitations become apparent as settings increase. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 30 FPS (179 to 149), and the jump to High costs another 38 FPS (149 to 111). At 4K, the GPU is completely overwhelmed, with even the Low preset producing only 66 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The system-shared memory configuration is a significant drawback, as it creates contention between the CPU and GPU for memory bandwidth, further limiting performance in memory-intensive scenarios. The data shows that the Arc B390 is a GPU designed for basic tasks and light gaming, and its performance in a competitive FPS like Counter-Strike 2 is only acceptable at the lowest settings and resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Intel Arc B390 ranks 2535th out of 2870 tested combos in Counter-Strike 2. This places the system in the bottom 12% of all configurations, which is a poor result for a system built around a high-end CPU. The ranking is heavily skewed by the GPU's weak performance. While the CPU is a top-tier part, its contribution to this specific game's frame rate is minimal because the GPU cannot keep up. The data suggests that this combo is severely unbalanced, with the CPU's potential being largely untapped due to the graphics bottleneck. For context, the CPU alone scores in the 80th percentile of all processors, but the combo's rank in-game is driven down by the GPU's 9th percentile standing. This mismatch is evident in the frame rate data: at 1080p Low, the system produces 179 FPS, but a system with a mid-range discrete GPU would likely double that figure. The rank of 2535 indicates that most other tested combinations, including those with older or lower-end CPUs, will outperform this setup in Counter-Strike 2 simply because they have a more capable graphics solution. The only scenarios where this combo is competitive are at 1080p with Low settings, where it can maintain a playable frame rate, but even then, it is far from the top of the leaderboard.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern across resolutions. At the Low preset, the average frame rate drops from 179 FPS at 1080p to 118 FPS at 1440p, and then to 66 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 44% drop from 1440p to 4K. At the Medium preset, the average FPS goes from 149 at 1080p to 98 at 1440p and 55 at 4K. The High preset shows a similar trend, with 111 FPS at 1080p, 73 at 1440p, and 41 at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most punishing, with 86 FPS at 1080p, 57 at 1440p, and 32 at 4K.

This scaling behavior is a textbook example of a GPU-limited scenario. The frame rate drops are roughly proportional to the increase in pixel count. For instance, going from 1080p (1920x1080) to 4K (3840x2160) quadruples the number of pixels, and the FPS at Low settings drops from 179 to 66, which is a 63% reduction — slightly less than the 75% reduction expected from a pure pixel-count scaling, but still indicative of a heavy GPU workload. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain relatively constant across resolutions, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with resolution. The data shows that this is not the case, confirming that the Arc B390 is the limiting component. The fact that the FPS does not drop to exactly 25% of the 1080p value at 4K suggests that there is some overhead from the system-shared memory and other factors, but the overall trend is clear. For users of this combo, the resolution scaling means that playing at 1080p is mandatory for a smooth experience, and dropping to 4K is only feasible for static screenshots or non-gameplay scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this CPU and GPU combo in Counter-Strike 2?

A: The data shows that the Low preset at 1080p provides the highest average frame rate of 179 FPS, making it the only configuration that consistently exceeds 144 FPS. Higher presets at this resolution drop significantly, with Medium at 149 FPS, High at 111 FPS, and Ultra at 86 FPS.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D or the Intel Arc B390 the bottleneck in this system?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck. Frame rates scale dramatically with resolution and settings, which is characteristic of a GPU limitation. The CPU's performance is high, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14317, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482 is in the 9th percentile, severely capping the system's gaming performance.

Q: How does this combo's performance rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 2535th out of 2870 tested combos in Counter-Strike 2, placing it in the bottom 12% of all configurations. This poor rank is almost entirely due to the GPU's weak performance, despite the CPU being in the 80th percentile of all processors.

Q: Can this system play Counter-Strike 2 at 4K resolution?

A: According to the measured data, 4K playability is limited. Even at the Low preset, the average frame rate is 66 FPS, which is above 60 FPS but not ideal for competitive play. The Medium preset drops to 55 FPS, and High and Ultra presets produce 41 FPS and 32 FPS respectively, which are not playable for a fast-paced FPS.

Q: Does lowering the resolution from 1080p to 4K have a significant impact on frame rate?

A: Yes, the impact is substantial. At the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 179 at 1080p to 118 at 1440p and 66 at 4K. This represents a 63% reduction in FPS from 1080p to 4K, confirming that the GPU's rendering capabilities are the limiting factor.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B390's average benchmark score of 1482 is only 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and 2.7% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710. This indicates that the Arc B390 is at the entry-level tier of GPU performance, comparable to decade-old discrete graphics cards.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B390

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 80 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Intel Arc B390 in Counter-Strike 2

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 66.0
3840x2160 Medium 55.0
3840x2160 High 41.0
3840x2160 Ultra 32.0
2560x1440 Low 118.0
2560x1440 Medium 98.0
2560x1440 High 73.0
2560x1440 Ultra 57.0
1920x1080 Low 179.0
1920x1080 Medium 149.0
1920x1080 High 111.0
1920x1080 Ultra 86.0

Counter-Strike 2 with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike 2 with Arc B390 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Arc B390

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.