Control
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 55 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 32 | 36 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 42 | 48 | 54 | 76 |
| 1080p Full HD | 55 | 63 | 71 | 101 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
# Control with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc B570
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the Intel Arc B570 produces a Control experience that is firmly playable at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K. The combination ranks 2307 out of 2888 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower third of all system configurations, which aligns with the Arc B570's mid-range positioning. The measured data shows a clear pattern: this setup is limited by the GPU at higher resolutions, while the 12-core, 24-thread Ryzen 9 7900X provides ample headroom across all tested settings.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals where the bottleneck resides. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 101 at 1920x1080 to 76 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 25 FPS, and then further down to 51 at 3840x2160, representing a 50% drop from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the Intel Arc B570's rendering throughput becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases.
The pattern persists across all settings presets. At High settings, the average FPS moves from 63 at 1080p to 48 at 1440p and finally to 32 at 4K — a 31 FPS total reduction. At Ultra settings, the numbers are 55, 42, and 28 respectively, showing a similar proportional decline. The fact that the frame rate roughly halves when going from 1080p to 4K at every preset suggests that the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are being saturated by the increased resolution demand.
Interestingly, the scaling between 1080p and 1440p is less severe than between 1440p and 4K. For Medium settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 17 FPS (71 to 54), while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 18 FPS (54 to 36). This relatively linear degradation indicates that the GPU's fill rate and texture throughput are evenly taxed as resolution increases, with no sudden cliff until Ultra settings at 4K, where the average dips to 28 FPS.
The CPU's role in this scaling is minimal. With a boost clock of 5.60 GHz and a strong single-thread score of 2016.5 in Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 9 7900X is unlikely to constrain frame delivery at any resolution. The data confirms this: the FPS differences between resolutions are entirely consistent with GPU load scaling, not CPU limitations.
Settings Recommendations
For 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 101 FPS average, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay, but the Medium preset at 71 FPS offers a better balance of visual quality and performance. The High preset at 63 FPS remains playable, while Ultra drops to 55 FPS — still acceptable for most players. Given that the Medium preset provides a minimum FPS of 61 and maximum of 82, it offers the most consistent experience at this resolution without sacrificing too much visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts. Low settings produce 76 FPS average, which is smooth, but Medium at 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS is borderline for fast-paced action. High at 48 FPS may feel slightly sluggish during intense combat sequences. For a more consistent experience, Low settings are the safest choice at 1440p, as they maintain a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Medium preset is viable for players who prioritize visual quality over absolute smoothness, given its 46 FPS minimum.
At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more constrained. Low settings yield 51 FPS average, which is playable but not ideal. Medium drops to 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 FPS, while High and Ultra fall to 32 and 28 FPS respectively. For 4K, Low settings are the only reasonable option, and even then, the frame rate hovers near the lower edge of playability. Players seeking higher visual quality at 4K would need a more powerful GPU than the Arc B570.
Across all resolutions, the measured data indicates that Medium settings offer the best compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate stability, as evidenced by the consistent minimum FPS values recorded (61 at 1080p, 46 at 1440p, 31 at 4K). The absence of minimum FPS data for Low, High, and Ultra presets in the measurements means that Medium is the only preset with documented frame time consistency, making it the most reliable choice for smooth gameplay.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz provide substantial single-thread performance, which is critical for game engines like Control that rely heavily on a few primary threads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2016.5 and multi-core score of 29300 indicate a processor that can handle both lightly-threaded game logic and heavily-threaded background tasks without becoming a bottleneck.
In the context of Control's measured FPS, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU. The fact that FPS scales almost entirely with resolution and settings — rather than showing any CPU-related anomalies — suggests that the Ryzen 9 7900X is never the limiting component in this configuration. Even at 1080p Low settings, where CPU load is typically highest relative to GPU load, the system achieves 101 FPS average, which is likely near the Arc B570's maximum output at that preset rather than a CPU ceiling.
The processor's 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for game assets, and its DDR5 memory support ensures low latency access to frequently used data. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and 2-thread score of 2137 further confirm that the CPU can deliver high per-core performance, which is essential for maintaining consistent frame times in action-adventure games with complex physics and AI.
Compared to the nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database, the Ryzen 9 7900X sits within 0.6% of the Intel Xeon 634 and 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 7313P in average benchmark score, while being 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-14700F. This tight clustering indicates that the CPU's performance is well within the expected range for high-end desktop processors, and its 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it is not a weak link in this gaming configuration.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Control with this CPU-GPU combo?
A: Based on the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution. At Medium settings, the system achieves 71 FPS average with a minimum of 61 FPS, providing a smooth and consistent experience. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset drops to 54 FPS average with a 46 FPS minimum, which is acceptable but less ideal for fast-paced gameplay.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 perform at 4K in Control?
A: The Arc B570 delivers 51 FPS average at 4K with Low settings, which is playable. However, at Medium settings the average drops to 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 FPS, and at High and Ultra settings the averages fall to 32 and 28 FPS respectively, which are below the threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: Is the Ryzen 9 7900X bottlenecking the Arc B570 in this game?
A: No, the data does not indicate CPU bottlenecking. The frame rates scale consistently with resolution and settings changes, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance. The Ryzen 9 7900X's strong single-thread performance (2016.5 in Cinebench R23) and 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs suggest it has ample headroom for this game.
Q: What settings preset provides the most consistent frame times?
A: The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values across all resolutions. At 1080p, it ranges from 61 to 82 FPS; at 1440p, from 46 to 62 FPS; and at 4K, from 31 to 42 FPS. This consistency makes Medium the most reliable preset for avoiding frame rate hitches.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?
A: This combination ranks 2307 out of 2888 tested combos in Control, placing it in the lower third of all system configurations. This ranking is consistent with the Arc B570's mid-range GPU positioning, as indicated by its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs.
Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 1440p in Control?
A: Only at Low settings, where the measured average is 76 FPS. At Medium settings, the average is 54 FPS, and at High settings it is 48 FPS. To consistently stay above 60 FPS at 1440p, players must use Low settings or reduce the resolution.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and uses the BMG-G21 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC with 19,600 million transistors. Its base and boost clocks are both 2500 MHz, providing a consistent clock speed across workloads. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical resource for a game like Control that streams high-resolution textures and effects.
The measured FPS data shows that the Arc B570's performance in Control is heavily influenced by both resolution and settings. At 1080p, the GPU can push 101 FPS at Low settings, but this drops to 55 FPS at Ultra — a 46% reduction. At 4K, the range narrows to 51 FPS at Low and 28 FPS at Ultra, indicating that the GPU's compute and memory resources are increasingly strained as pixel count rises.
The GPU's 2304 shading units and 80 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, which are moderate figures for a mid-range card. The 18 ray tracing cores suggest some RT capability, though the measured data does not include ray tracing-specific results. The 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for 1080p gaming at high settings, but the 4K results indicate that this GPU is not designed for ultra-high-resolution gaming.
The Arc B570's nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher average score) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% lower average score). This clustering places the B570 in a competitive mid-range segment, and the Control FPS data confirms that it performs as expected for this tier: capable at 1080p, acceptable at 1440p with reduced settings, and limited at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are: Low 101, Medium 71 (minimum 61, maximum 82), High 63, and Ultra 55. The 30 FPS spread between Low and Ultra demonstrates the GPU's sensitivity to settings changes at this resolution, with each preset step costing approximately 8-15 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low 76, Medium 54 (minimum 46, maximum 62), High 48, and Ultra 42. The reduction from 1080p is significant — 25 FPS at Low, 17 FPS at Medium, 15 FPS at High, and 13 FPS at Ultra — showing that resolution scaling has a larger impact than settings scaling at this level.
At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low 51, Medium 36 (minimum 31, maximum 42), High 32, and Ultra 28. The 4K results show the GPU's limits clearly: even at Low settings, the frame rate barely exceeds 50 FPS, and Ultra settings produce an average below 30 FPS, which is generally considered unplayable for action games.
The Medium preset's minimum FPS values (61 at 1080p, 46 at 1440p, 31 at 4K) provide the only documented frame time data in the measurements, indicating that this preset offers the most predictable performance. The lack of minimum FPS data for other presets means their frame time consistency cannot be assessed from this dataset, but the average FPS values suggest that Low settings are the most reliably smooth across all resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2307 out of 2888 tested combos in Control, placing it in the 20th percentile of all configurations. This ranking is notably lower than the individual component percentiles — the CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU ranks in the 65th percentile among all GPUs — which indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing.
The gap between the CPU's high percentile and the combo's low percentile suggests that this processor is significantly more capable than what the Arc B570 can utilize in this game. The data shows that the Ryzen 9 7900X's 12 cores and 24 threads are largely underutilized, as Control's frame rates are consistently GPU-bound across all tested resolutions and settings.
For players considering this combo, the ranking implies that upgrading the GPU would yield substantial performance gains in Control without requiring a CPU change. Conversely, the Ryzen 9 7900X's strong benchmark scores (29300 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 19267 in Geekbench multi-core) indicate that it would pair well with a more powerful GPU in other games or workloads. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation: the combo's performance ceiling is defined by the Arc B570's capabilities, not the CPU's.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + Intel Arc B570 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 36.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 32.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 76.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 48.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 42.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 101.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 71.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 63.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 55.0 |
Control with Ryzen 9 7900X + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.