Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 89 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 53 | 60 | 84 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 79 | 86 | 123 |
| 1080p Full HD | 89 | 102 | 118 | 160 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers a solid, high-refresh-rate experience in Control, though it demands careful settings management at higher resolutions. The combination ranks 667th out of 1636 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database. This position reflects a system that can comfortably handle the game’s physics-heavy combat and destructible environments without being a top-tier enthusiast setup. The CPU’s 3D V-Cache and 8-core, 16-thread configuration provide strong foundational performance, while the GPU’s RDNA 3 architecture handles the game’s visual effects with commendable efficiency. Benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern: performance drops predictably as resolution and settings increase, but the system remains playable even at the most demanding presets.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 667 out of 1636 tested combinations indicates a performance profile that sits comfortably above the median but below the elite tier. The CPU itself holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 26574. Its nearest rivals in synthetic tests are tightly clustered: the AMD EPYC 8024P scores 26555 (a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core i9-11900K scores 26546 (0.1% difference), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 scores 26617 (-0.2% difference). This suggests the 5800X3D is essentially performance-equivalent to these chips in general compute, but its 96 MB of shared L3 cache gives it an edge in gaming workloads that depend on rapid data access.
The GPU, meanwhile, sits at the 73rd percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 30097. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which scores 30109 with a 0% delta, indicating a near-exact match in raw compute. The AMD Radeon RX 570 trails at 30158 (-0.2%), while the NVIDIA Tesla M60 and RTX 5070 Mobile are within 0.4% and 0.6% respectively. These narrow margins highlight that the RX 7700 XT is well-positioned in its performance class, though the Control results show that game-specific optimizations can shift the balance. The measured FPS data confirms that this combination is capable of exceeding 60 FPS at most settings, with only the 4K Ultra preset falling below that threshold.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for Control’s high-resolution textures and complex particle effects, though the 4K Ultra results suggest the 12 GB frame buffer becomes a limiting factor at maximum settings. The GPU’s clock speeds are aggressive, with a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. These clocks allow the card to maintain high utilization in Control, which relies heavily on GPU compute for its physics simulations and ray-traced reflections.
The 54 ray accelerators and 3456 shading units are directly relevant to Control, a game known for its real-time ray tracing features. While the measured FPS data does not include ray tracing benchmarks, the GPU’s compute capabilities (35.17 TFLOPS FP32) suggest it can handle the game’s standard rendering pipeline with ease. The 96 ROPs and 216 TMUs ensure adequate pixel and texture throughput for the game’s detailed environments. The GPU’s 245 W TDP is a reasonable draw for this performance class, and the dual-slot cooler should manage thermals adequately. The 550 W suggested PSU provides sufficient headroom for transient power spikes.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data reveals a clear sweet spot for this combination. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 102.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset offers 117.6 FPS, while Low reaches 160 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 88.9 FPS, which is still playable but sacrifices smoothness for marginal visual gains. For most players, the High preset at 1080p offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, as it maintains triple-digit frame rates while retaining the game’s atmospheric lighting and shadow quality.
At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 79.2 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset offers 86.3 FPS, while Low reaches 122.9 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 67.6 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. For 1440p, the Medium or High presets are recommended, as they provide a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while preserving the game’s visual identity. At 3840x2160, the situation changes: High delivers 53.1 FPS, Medium 59.7 FPS, and Low 83.9 FPS. Ultra falls to 47.3 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most users. The data indicates that 4K players should use the Medium preset to stay near 60 FPS, or drop to Low for a smoother experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination shows its strongest performance. Low settings produce an average of 160 FPS, Medium 117.6 FPS, High 102.4 FPS, and Ultra 88.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 44.4% performance drop, which is typical for a game like Control that scales lighting and particle effects aggressively. The gap between Medium and High is relatively small at 15.2 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 13.5 FPS. This suggests that High is the most efficient preset at 1080p, offering 102.4 FPS without the steep cost of Ultra.
At 2560x1440, the results scale as expected. Low produces 122.9 FPS, Medium 86.3 FPS, High 79.2 FPS, and Ultra 67.6 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 36.6 FPS, while the drop from Medium to High is only 7.1 FPS. The High to Ultra drop is 11.6 FPS. The 1440p results show that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck, as the CPU’s 3D V-Cache provides ample headroom for the game’s physics calculations. The 79.2 FPS at High is a strong result for a 1440p monitor, and the 67.6 FPS at Ultra remains playable.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Low produces 83.9 FPS, Medium 59.7 FPS, High 53.1 FPS, and Ultra 47.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 24.2 FPS, while the drop from Medium to High is 6.6 FPS. The High to Ultra drop is 5.8 FPS. The 4K results indicate that the 12 GB frame buffer and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Low and Medium settings, but the game’s Ultra preset likely pushes texture and shadow data beyond what the card can efficiently handle. The 53.1 FPS at High is borderline, and players seeking a locked 60 FPS should opt for Medium.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combination in Control?*
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 at High settings delivers 79.2 FPS, which is the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1920x1080, High delivers 102.4 FPS, while 3840x2160 High drops to 53.1 FPS.
*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Control?*
A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K, the Medium preset delivers 59.7 FPS, while Low reaches 83.9 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 47.3 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 26574 on average, which is within 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 8024P (26555) and the Intel Core i9-11900K (26546). It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 by 0.2% (26617).
Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, High delivers 102.4 FPS, while Ultra drops to 88.9 FPS. The 13.5 FPS difference represents a 13.2% performance loss, which may not justify the visual improvements for all players.
*Q: Does the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM affect Control performance?*
A: The data suggests that 12 GB is sufficient for most settings, but the 4K Ultra preset (47.3 FPS) shows a significant drop compared to High (53.1 FPS), indicating that the frame buffer may be a limiting factor at maximum settings on 4K displays.
Q: How does this combo rank against all tested combinations?
A: The combination ranks 667th out of 1636 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier. This indicates a system that can handle Control well at 1080p and 1440p, but requires settings adjustments for 4K.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 83.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 59.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 53.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 122.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 86.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 79.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 67.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 160.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 117.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 102.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 88.9 |
Control with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + RX 7700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.