Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
122
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 122 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 65 74 83 114
1440p QHD 96 105 123 168
1080p Full HD 120 145 160 215

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 114
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 High 74
3840x2160 Ultra 65
2560x1440 Low 168
2560x1440 Medium 123
2560x1440 High 105
2560x1440 Ultra 96
1920x1080 Low 215
1920x1080 Medium 160
1920x1080 High 145
1920x1080 Ultra 120

Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination delivers a robust Control experience, ranking in the 86th percentile (231 out of 1636) of tested hardware combos. The pairing of the 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 processor with the RDNA 3 flagship produces high frame rates across all settings, though the data reveals that the GPU is the primary performance driver. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to determine optimal settings, scaling behavior, and the specific roles of the CPU and GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS achievable with this combo at 1080p?

A: The peak measured average is 215.3 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This drops to 120.3 FPS at the Ultra preset at the same resolution.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 24,063 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. This places it 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 8024P and Intel Core i9-11900K (both with an average score of 26,555 and 26,546 respectively), but it trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 by 0.2% and the Intel Core i9-12900HK by 0.4%.

Q: Is the GPU's 24 GB VRAM a factor in this game's performance?

A: The Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 24 GB of GDDR6 memory is far more than likely needed for Control. The data shows performance scaling from Low to Ultra presets, indicating the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth (960.0 GB/s) handle the workload without obvious capacity bottlenecks.

Q: What is the FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 145.2 at 1920x1080 to 74.1 at 3840x2160. This represents a 49% reduction in frame rate when moving to 4K.

Q: Does the CPU's single-thread performance limit frame rates at lower resolutions?

A: The data shows a large FPS increase at lower resolutions and Low settings (215.3 FPS at 1080p), which suggests the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. The single-thread score of 884 in 3DMark and 3,397 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance, allowing for high frame rates when GPU load is low.

Q: How does the 5800X3D's cache configuration potentially benefit gaming?

A: The CPU features 96 MB of shared L3 cache, a hallmark of the X3D series. This large cache likely helps maintain high average frame rates, as evidenced by the 120+ FPS results at 1080p on Medium and High presets, where CPU overhead is more prominent.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data indicates that the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium yields 159.9 FPS, which is 39.7 FPS higher than High (145.2) and represents a substantial 39.6 FPS gain over Ultra (120.3). This suggests that the visual uplift from Medium to High or Ultra comes at a significant performance cost relative to the frame rate return.

For 2560x1440, the Medium preset's 122.5 FPS average is comfortably above the 96 FPS seen at Ultra, while still providing a high-refresh-rate experience. The gap between Medium and High (105 FPS) is 17.5 FPS, making Medium the clear sweet spot for users with 1440p displays. At 4K, Medium produces 83.1 FPS, which is the only preset above the 60 FPS threshold besides Low. While High (74.1 FPS) and Ultra (65.2 FPS) are playable, Medium provides the best headroom for maintaining smooth gameplay.

The Low preset, while producing the highest frame rates (215.3 FPS at 1080p), is not recommended for general play as it likely sacrifices too much visual fidelity. The data supports Medium as the optimal choice, delivering a 29.6% performance increase over High at 1080p and a 16.7% increase over High at 1440p. For 4K, Medium's 83.1 FPS is 12.1% faster than High, making it the recommended starting point for a quality experience.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly demonstrates that the RX 7900 XTX is the limiting component at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 145.2 at 1080p to 105 at 1440p, a 27.7% decrease, and then to 74.1 at 4K, a further 29.4% decrease. This consistent decline with each resolution step indicates that pixel throughput is the primary constraint.

The scaling pattern is similar across all presets. For Low settings, the drop from 215.3 FPS at 1080p to 168.2 at 1440p is 21.9%, and then to 114.3 at 4K is another 32.0%. The Medium preset shows a 23.7% drop from 1080p to 1440p (159.9 to 122.5) and a 32.2% drop from 1440p to 4K (122.5 to 83.1). Ultra follows the same trend, with a 20.2% reduction to 96 FPS at 1440p and a further 32.1% reduction to 65.2 at 4K.

The larger percentage drops between 1440p and 4K (approximately 30%) compared to 1080p to 1440p (approximately 20-25%) suggest that the GPU's compute resources become increasingly strained as resolution climbs. The CPU, with its high single-thread score of 884 in 3DMark and 3,397 in Cinebench R23, maintains sufficient performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck, as evidenced by the 215.3 FPS result at 1080p Low. This indicates that the RX 7900 XTX's 61.39 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the determining factor for frame rates at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 215.3 FPS, Medium drops to 159.9 FPS, High to 145.2 FPS, and Ultra to 120.3 FPS. The differences between presets are substantial: moving from Low to Medium costs 55.4 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 24.9 FPS. This shows a clear hierarchy where each preset tier has a meaningful impact on frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the results are 168.2 FPS on Low, 122.5 FPS on Medium, 105 FPS on High, and 96 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium is 45.7 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra narrows to just 9 FPS. The 1440p data indicates that the GPU is beginning to become the limiting factor, as the FPS spread between settings tightens compared to 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 114.3 FPS on Low, 83.1 FPS on Medium, 74.1 FPS on High, and 65.2 FPS on Ultra. The performance delta between Low and Ultra is 49.1 FPS, which is a smaller absolute difference than at lower resolutions. Notably, the Ultra preset at 4K produces 65.2 FPS, which is only 45.8% of the 1080p Ultra result of 120.3 FPS. This data point reinforces that 4K Ultra is the most demanding scenario, but still playable. The 74.1 FPS at 4K High is 29.6% higher than the 4K Ultra result, making High a viable alternative for smoother 4K gameplay.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the dominant component in this system for Control. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, coupled with a 384-bit bus and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, provides ample headroom for the game's assets. The GPU's 61.39 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, along with 96 ray tracing cores, drives the high frame rates seen in the measured data. The boost clock of 2498 MHz and game clock of 2365 MHz allow the card to maintain consistent performance across the tested scenarios.

The GPU's benchmark results place it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 44,019. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, which it trails by 2%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, which it leads by 0.8%. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,841 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 189,573 are strong indicators of its rasterization capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 31,238 further supports its position as a high-end card.

The scaling data supports the conclusion that the GPU is the primary performance limiter. The 49% FPS drop from 1080p High to 4K High (145.2 to 74.1) aligns with a 4x increase in pixel count, which is more than the GPU's compute scaling can compensate for. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU, and its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with 96 MB of L3 cache, provide sufficient throughput. The 5800X3D's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,299 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,063 indicate robust multi-threading capabilities, but the game's performance at higher resolutions is clearly dictated by the RX 7900 XTX's rendering power. The 4K Ultra result of 65.2 FPS, while lower than other presets, is still a playable frame rate, confirming that the GPU can handle the game's most demanding settings.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2498 MHz MHz
TDP 355 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 114.3
3840x2160 Medium 83.1
3840x2160 High 74.1
3840x2160 Ultra 65.2
2560x1440 Low 168.2
2560x1440 Medium 122.5
2560x1440 High 105.0
2560x1440 Ultra 96.0
1920x1080 Low 215.3
1920x1080 Medium 159.9
1920x1080 High 145.2
1920x1080 Ultra 120.3

Control with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + RX 7900 XTX

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.