Control

Control, a 2019 action-adventure title, is a demanding benchmark for any system, and this analysis examines the pairing of an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X processor with an AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT graphics card. The measured frame rate data provides a clear picture of how this combination handles the game's supernatural physics and visual effects across common resolutions and quality settings. This combination ranks at 1422 out of 3720 tested system configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all tested combos for this title. The following report breaks down the GPU and CPU roles, analyzes the measured FPS data, and provides actionable settings recommendations based solely on the provided facts.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings in Control?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 102 frames per second.

Q: How does the frame rate at 4K (3840x2160) Ultra compare to the 1080p Ultra result?

A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 45, which is exactly half of the 1080p Ultra average of 89 FPS, indicating a significant performance drop at higher resolutions.

Q: Which resolution and settings combination yields the highest measured average FPS?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 162, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 123 at Low settings to 67 at Ultra settings, a substantial decrease of 56 FPS.

Q: What is the rank of this specific CPU and GPU combination among all tested combos for Control?

A: The combo ranks 1422 out of 3720 total tested combinations, placing it in the 61st percentile of all systems tested for this game.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 50, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Medium settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the primary driver of visual performance in Control. This GPU is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. Its core operates at a base clock of 1435 MHz and boosts up to 2544 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz. The GPU has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines, which are all leveraged heavily by Control's particle effects and lighting.

The GPU's 12 GB frame buffer is a critical asset for this game, especially at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the VRAM capacity is sufficient to handle the high-resolution textures and complex scenes without significant stuttering, as evidenced by the playable average FPS figures. The memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is also a key factor; as resolution increases, the demand on memory bandwidth grows, and this figure supports the observed performance scaling from 1080p to 4K. The GPU's compute capabilities, rated at 35.17 TFLOPS for FP32, are responsible for the game's physics simulations, which can heavily impact frame times in chaotic encounters.

In terms of standing among its peers, the RX 7700 XT holds a percentile rank of 67 among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, which it trails by a mere 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700, which it leads by 1.7%. This data suggests that the RX 7700 XT's raw performance is competitive with these cards, though its specific strengths in Control may vary based on driver optimizations and architectural differences.

How This Combo Ranks

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT achieves a rank of 1422 out of 3720 tested combinations for Control, placing it in the top 38% of systems. This rank is a composite measure of the system's overall ability to run the game smoothly, factoring in both CPU and GPU performance. Given that this game is from 2019, the rank reflects a strong level of performance, though it is not at the absolute top tier, which would be reserved for the most powerful and latest hardware.

The rank indicates that this system is well-balanced for Control, as it is neither severely CPU-bound nor GPU-bound in a way that would cause it to fall behind other configurations in the database. The 1422nd position out of 3720 suggests that while many high-end systems will outperform it, it also sits comfortably ahead of a large number of older or lower-end builds. This reflects the 5800X's strong single-threaded performance and the 7700 XT's solid rasterization capabilities, which are the primary requirements for this title.

When looking at the CPU's performance relative to others, the Ryzen 7 5800X is in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 29123 compares closely with rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, which has an average score of 29093 and a delta of 0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, with a score of 28940 and a delta of 0.6%. This data reinforces that the CPU is a strong performer that will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, including Control.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates across the board. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 162 FPS, which drops to 115 FPS at Medium, 102 FPS at High, and 89 FPS at Ultra. The Medium setting shows a minimum FPS of 98 and a maximum of 133, indicating some frame time variance but generally smooth gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The average FPS at Low is 123, at Medium is 87, at High is 77, and at Ultra is 67. The Medium setting at this resolution shows a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. At 3840x2160, the demands are significantly higher. The average FPS at Low is 83, at Medium is 59, at High is 52, and at Ultra is 45. The 4K Medium setting records a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 68 FPS.

The data shows a consistent performance hierarchy: lowering settings from Ultra to Low yields a significant FPS increase at every resolution. For instance, at 1080p, the jump from Ultra to Low is from 89 to 162 FPS, an increase of 82%. At 1440p, the same settings change results in a jump from 67 to 123 FPS, an 83% increase. This indicates that the game's quality presets have a substantial impact on the GPU workload, and the RX 7700 XT's performance scales predictably with these changes.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides ample processing power for Control. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, coupled with the Zen 3 architecture, ensures strong single-threaded performance, which is often the most critical factor for game logic and frame pacing. The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache is beneficial for reducing memory latency, which can improve performance in complex scenes with many objects.

In Control, the CPU is responsible for handling the game's physics engine, AI, and other background tasks. While the GPU is often the bottleneck at higher resolutions, the 5800X's performance ensures it can keep up with the GPU at lower resolutions where frame rates are very high. The 3DMark single-thread score of 943 and the multi-thread score of 7578 indicate a balanced processor capable of handling both the game's main thread and its supporting threads effectively.

The CPU's overall strength is also reflected in its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15476 and a single-core score of 1574.5. These figures, along with its 81st percentile ranking, confirm that the 5800X is a capable gaming processor that will not be a limiting factor in this configuration. Its performance is closely matched with its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, showing that it is a competitive part in its segment.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and frame rate priorities. For 1920x1080, the High preset is an excellent choice, delivering an average of 102 FPS. This provides a high level of visual fidelity while maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold, offering a smooth and responsive experience. For users with high refresh rate monitors, the Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 115 FPS, could be a better option to push frame rates higher.

At 2560x1440, the High preset, with an average of 77 FPS, is the recommended balance for a smooth experience. This setting offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium while still maintaining a playable frame rate. The Ultra preset at 1440p, at 67 FPS, is also viable for those who prioritize visual quality over a higher frame rate buffer. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset, with an average of 59 FPS, is the most balanced choice, as it provides a playable experience with a minimum FPS of 50. The High preset at 4K, averaging 52 FPS, is also acceptable but may feel less consistent.

The data suggests that the High preset is generally the best "sweet spot" for this GPU, offering a substantial improvement in visual quality over Medium with a manageable performance cost. The Ultra preset provides diminishing returns in visual quality for a significant FPS hit, making it less desirable for competitive or high-refresh-rate gaming. The Low preset offers the highest frame rates but sacrifices too much visual fidelity for most users.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is a key indicator of the system's bottleneck. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 102 at 1080p to 77 at 1440p, a 24.5% decrease, and then to 52 at 4K, a 49% decrease from the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering resolution has a direct and significant impact on the frame rate.

The drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings is a 50 FPS reduction, illustrating the massive increase in pixel count that the GPU must process. This confirms that the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. The CPU's role becomes less significant as resolution increases, as the GPU's workload grows exponentially with each pixel rendered.

However, the scaling is not perfectly linear, suggesting that the CPU still plays a part in overall performance. For instance, the FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p is 25 FPS, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is also 25 FPS. This consistent drop indicates a steady increase in GPU workload, but the system's ability to maintain playable frame rates at 4K, even at Low settings with 83 FPS, shows that the combination is well-equipped to handle Control at any resolution. The system is clearly GPU-limited at 4K, but the CPU is still strong enough to avoid creating a secondary bottleneck that would cause stuttering or inconsistent frame times.