Control
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 143 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 71 | 82 | 96 | 132 |
| 1440p QHD | 112 | 127 | 143 | 200 |
| 1080p Full HD | 143 | 164 | 186 | 258 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers a robust Control experience, with performance scaling that clearly identifies the GPU as the primary workload driver across most configurations. The measured data positions this combo in the 95th percentile of tested systems, with performance characteristics that shift dramatically based on resolution and quality presets.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario, though the magnitude of the drop varies significantly by settings preset. At High settings, average FPS falls from 163.8 at 1920x1080 to 127.0 at 2560x1440, a 22.5% reduction, and then to 82.4 at 3840x2160, representing a 49.7% decline from the 1080p baseline. This pattern indicates the RTX 5080 is being progressively saturated as pixel count increases, with the CPU's 6-core Zen 4 architecture maintaining sufficient headroom even at lower resolutions.
The Low settings data tells a different story. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 257.6 FPS, which drops to 199.9 at 1440p and 132.3 at 4K. The 1080p Low result is notably high, suggesting the frame rate is approaching a ceiling where even the Ryzen 5 7500F's 5.00 GHz boost clock becomes a contributing factor. The 48.6% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is slightly less severe than the High preset, implying that at lower graphical loads, the CPU's role expands, though the GPU still dominates overall throughput.
Ultra settings exhibit the steepest scaling curve. Average FPS starts at 142.6 at 1080p, drops to 111.5 at 1440p, and falls to 70.8 at 4K. The 4K Ultra result represents only 49.7% of the 1080p Ultra figure, showing that the most demanding settings amplify pixel-count sensitivity. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is 13.6 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 11.6 FPS, indicating diminishing returns as settings increase.
Settings Recommendations
The measured rows indicate that the High preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 4K, High delivers 82.4 FPS, which is 11.6 FPS above Ultra and 13.6 FPS below Medium, but the visual quality improvement over Medium typically justifies the slight performance cost. At 1440p, High achieves 127.0 FPS, substantially above the 60 FPS threshold with room to spare for demanding scenes.
For users prioritizing frame rate, the Low preset at 1440p provides 199.9 FPS, which is 72.9 FPS higher than High at the same resolution. This represents a significant competitive advantage in action sequences. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 142.8 FPS, which falls between High and Low, making it a viable middle ground for those who want improved visuals without sacrificing responsiveness.
At 1080p, the Ultra preset's 142.6 FPS is still highly playable, and the High preset's 163.8 FPS offers an excellent combination of fidelity and speed. The data suggests that Ultra at 1080p is the highest quality setting that maintains consistently high frame rates, while 4K Ultra at 70.8 FPS is acceptable for slower-paced exploration but may feel less fluid during intense combat sequences.
GPU Role
The RTX 5080's specifications directly inform its performance in Control. With 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, the card provides 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the game's texture and particle demands at 4K. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores support the game's real-time rendering features, while the 10752 shading units handle traditional rasterization workloads.
The memory clock runs at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed, and the boost clock reaches 2617 MHz. These figures correlate with the observed scaling: the GPU's compute resources are the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the consistent frame rate drops when moving from 1440p to 4K across all presets. The 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides substantial raw compute, but Control's engine appears to scale predictably with pixel count.
The 360 W TDP and 750 W suggested PSU indicate this is a high-power configuration, though the benchmark data does not include thermal or power throttling information. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures adequate bandwidth for the GPU's memory subsystem, and the dual-slot design with a 16-pin connector accommodates the power delivery requirements.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 257.6 FPS on Low, 185.9 FPS on Medium, 163.8 FPS on High, and 142.6 FPS on Ultra. The step from Low to Medium costs 71.7 FPS, while the step from Medium to High costs 22.1 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 21.2 FPS. This distribution shows that the largest performance penalty occurs when moving from Low to Medium, after which the incremental costs are relatively consistent.
At 2560x1440, results are 199.9 FPS on Low, 142.8 FPS on Medium, 127.0 FPS on High, and 111.5 FPS on Ultra. The Low to Medium gap widens to 57.1 FPS, while Medium to High narrows to 15.8 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 15.5 FPS. The 1440p results show a more linear progression, with each settings tier exacting a more uniform toll.
At 3840x2160, the figures are 132.3 FPS on Low, 96.0 FPS on Medium, 82.4 FPS on High, and 70.8 FPS on Ultra. The Low to Medium drop is 36.3 FPS, Medium to High is 13.6 FPS, and High to Ultra is 11.6 FPS. The 4K results demonstrate that the GPU's rendering capacity is most strained at this resolution, with even Low settings producing sub-144 FPS averages.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific configuration ranks 74th out of 1636 tested combos for Control, placing it in the top 4.5% of all systems benchmarked. The CPU itself sits in the 82nd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 24993. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H with a deltaPct of 0.1, and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X at -0.3 deltaPct, indicating the 7500F performs nearly identically to these alternatives in synthetic tests.
The GPU percentile is even stronger, at 89th among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 59188. The RTX 5080's nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Arc A570M is 1.6% ahead, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 trails by 1.9%. These margins are narrow, but the RTX 5080's advantage in real-world gaming is evident in the measured FPS data.
The combo rank of 74 reflects the synergy between the CPU and GPU in Control specifically. While the CPU is not the top performer in its class, its 6-core, 12-thread configuration with 32 MB of L3 cache provides sufficient processing power to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at most settings. The 4K Low result of 132.3 FPS is particularly telling, as it shows the system can maintain high frame rates even at the most demanding resolution when graphical settings are reduced.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 132.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 96.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 82.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 70.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 199.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 142.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 127.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 111.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 257.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 185.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 163.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 142.6 |
Control with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.