Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
133
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 133 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 72 82 93 130
1440p QHD 106 122 137 181
1080p Full HD 140 161 175 198

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 130
3840x2160 Medium 93
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Ultra 72
2560x1440 Low 181
2560x1440 Medium 137
2560x1440 High 122
2560x1440 Ultra 106
1920x1080 Low 198
1920x1080 Medium 175
1920x1080 High 161
1920x1080 Ultra 140

Control with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis

# CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer codename) using TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, drawing a 105 W TDP. The processor's defining feature is its large 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is critical for gaming workloads that frequently re-access small data sets. Its 3DMark scores show a balanced profile: 804 in single-thread, 3097 in 4-thread, 5357 in 8-thread, and 6764 in max-thread tests. Cinebench R23 results are 3157 single-core and 22366 multi-core, while Geekbench reports 1849 single-core and 11086 multi-core.

For Control, this CPU's performance envelope is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 5080 at most settings. The game's engine leverages multiple threads for physics, AI, and rendering tasks, but the data shows that frame rates scale more dramatically with GPU settings than with CPU throughput. The 5700X3D's 3DMark 16-thread score of 6764 and max-thread score of 6755 indicate near-perfect scaling beyond 8 threads, meaning Control can utilize the full 16 threads without diminishing returns. However, the single-thread score of 804 suggests that per-core performance is modest compared to newer architectures, which becomes relevant at 1080p where the CPU has more influence.

In the broader CPU landscape, the 5700X3D sits at the 77th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 24709. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D (avg score 24728, delta -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (avg score 24822, delta -0.5%), and the Intel Core i5-12450HX (avg score 24576, delta +0.5%). These deltas are negligible, placing the 5700X3D in a tight performance cluster. For Control specifically, this means the CPU provides consistent frame delivery without being the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

The processor's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR4 is adequate for the game's data streaming needs. The 8 cores and 16 threads align well with Control's multi-threaded design, but the benchmark data reveals that GPU load dominates at 1440p and above. At 1080p Low settings, where the GPU has spare capacity, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant, yet the measured 198 FPS average indicates no significant CPU limitation.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D's cache size impact Control's performance?

A: The 96 MB shared L3 cache is a substantial asset for gaming. Control's engine frequently accesses small, repeated data structures, and this large cache reduces memory latency. The benchmark results show strong frame rates across all resolutions, which is consistent with the cache benefiting gameplay scenarios where the same assets are accessed repeatedly.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and how do its closest rivals compare?

A: The 5700X3D ranks in the 77th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 24709. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, scores 24728 with a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 5700X3D is essentially tied. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822 (-0.5%), and the Intel Core i5-12450HX scores 24576 (+0.5%). These sub-1% differences indicate the 5700X3D performs equivalently to its immediate competitors in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Does the 5700X3D bottleneck the RTX 5080 in Control at any resolution?

A: The data indicates no significant bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 198 FPS average, which is the highest measured in this test set. The frame rate drops by only 8.6% from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings (198 to 181 FPS), suggesting the GPU remains the primary scaling factor. At 4K Low, the average drops to 130 FPS, a further 28.2% decline, confirming that resolution scaling is GPU-bound, not CPU-bound.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance for this game?

A: The 5700X3D's 3DMark 8-thread score of 5357 is 79.2% of its 16-thread score of 6764, showing strong scaling across cores. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 22366 is 7.1 times the single-core score of 3157. Control can leverage this multi-threading capability, and the measured frame rates remain consistently high across all settings, indicating the game benefits from the 8-core / 16-thread configuration.

Q: What is the CPU's production status and release timeline relative to the game?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D has an active production status and was released on 2024-01-07, approximately 4.5 years after Control's release on 2019-08-26. This means the CPU is a modern part running an older game, which explains why the performance headroom is substantial. The CPU's launch MSRP is $249, though this is the only pricing detail available.

Q: How does the CPU's memory architecture affect Control's performance?

A: The 5700X3D supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and ECC capability. Control's memory access patterns are not particularly bandwidth-intensive compared to modern titles, and the measured frame rates show no signs of memory-related stuttering or frame drops. The minimum FPS recorded at 1080p Medium is 148, which is 84.6% of the average 175 FPS, indicating stable frame delivery.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling across resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 161 FPS at 1080p to 122 FPS at 1440p (a 24.2% decrease), then to 82 FPS at 4K (a 32.8% decrease from 1440p). This consistent degradation with resolution increase is characteristic of GPU limitation, as the RTX 5080's rendering workload expands with pixel count.

At Low settings, the scaling is slightly different. The 1080p average is 198 FPS, dropping to 181 FPS at 1440p (an 8.6% decrease) and then to 130 FPS at 4K (a 28.2% decrease from 1440p). The relatively small drop from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings suggests that at 1080p Low, the CPU may be approaching its limit, preventing the GPU from fully stretching its legs. The larger 1440p-to-4K drop confirms that at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the sole limiting factor.

Ultra settings show the most pronounced resolution scaling. The average frame rate falls from 140 FPS at 1080p to 106 FPS at 1440p (a 24.3% decrease), then to 72 FPS at 4K (a 32.1% decrease from 1440p). These percentage drops are nearly identical to those seen at High settings, indicating that the relative performance scaling is consistent regardless of quality preset, with the GPU bearing the full load.

Medium settings exhibit the same trend with a 1080p average of 175 FPS, a 1440p average of 137 FPS (21.7% lower), and a 4K average of 93 FPS (32.1% lower than 1440p). The minimum FPS values at Medium settings provide additional insight: at 1080p the minimum is 148 FPS (84.6% of average), at 1440p it is 117 FPS (85.4% of average), and at 4K it is 79 FPS (84.9% of average). These consistent ratios suggest stable frame pacing with no sudden CPU-induced hitches, even when the GPU is heavily loaded.

The overall pattern indicates that the RTX 5080 is the primary performance determinant across all tested configurations. The 5700X3D provides sufficient headroom to keep the GPU fed at 1080p and 1440p, while at 4K the GPU's raw pixel throughput becomes the clear constraint. The scaling percentages align closely with theoretical pixel-count increases, confirming that the CPU is not introducing any measurable bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured frame rates span from 140 FPS at Ultra settings to 198 FPS at Low settings. The Medium preset delivers 175 FPS average with a minimum of 148 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS. High settings produce 161 FPS average. The spread from Low to Ultra is 58 FPS, representing a 29.3% performance penalty for maxing out quality at 1080p. Notably, the Medium preset's maximum of 201 FPS exceeds the Low preset's average of 198 FPS, indicating that the Medium settings can occasionally push above the Low preset's sustained performance.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 106 FPS at Ultra, 122 FPS at High, 137 FPS at Medium, and 181 FPS at Low. The Medium preset records a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 158 FPS. The resolution upgrade from 1080p to 1440p costs between 8.6% (Low settings) and 24.3% (Ultra settings) of performance. The Low preset at 1440p (181 FPS) still outperforms the Ultra preset at 1080p (140 FPS) by 29.3%, showing that lowering quality can offset resolution demands.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 72 FPS at Ultra, 82 FPS at High, 93 FPS at Medium, and 130 FPS at Low. The Medium preset reports a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 107 FPS. The 4K resolution imposes a significant burden: compared to 1080p, the frame rate at Ultra settings drops by 48.6% (from 140 to 72 FPS), and at High settings by 49.1% (from 161 to 82 FPS). The Low preset at 4K (130 FPS) is the only configuration that maintains a high refresh rate experience at this resolution.

Across all resolutions, the Low settings consistently deliver the highest frame rates, with the gap between Low and Ultra widening as resolution increases. At 1080p, the Low-to-Ultra delta is 58 FPS; at 1440p, it is 75 FPS; and at 4K, it is 58 FPS. This non-linear pattern suggests that at 1440p, the GPU's workload scaling amplifies the settings impact, while at 4K, the pixel throughput limit compresses the differences.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves a rank of 316 out of 3720 tested combos in Control. This places the combo in the top 8.5% of all configurations tested for this game. The high ranking reflects the synergistic balance between the CPU's large cache and the GPU's substantial compute resources.

The RTX 5080 itself ranks in the 87th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 56083. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S (avg score 55757, delta +0.6%), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (avg score 55698, delta +0.7%), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (avg score 57367, delta -2.2%). The GPU's performance is tightly clustered with these competitors, with deltas under 2.3% in either direction.

The combo's rank of 316 out of 3720 suggests that while this pairing is strong, other configurations achieve higher frame rates in Control. Given that the CPU sits at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile, the combo's top 8.5% placement indicates that the pairing performs slightly better than the geometric mean of its components' individual percentiles would suggest. This is likely due to the 5700X3D's 96 MB L3 cache, which provides a gaming-specific advantage that generic CPU benchmarks may not fully capture.

The deltaPct values for the GPU's nearest rivals show that the RTX 5080 is not the absolute fastest card, but its combination with the 5700X3D yields competitive results. The 2.2% delta to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (which scores higher) and the 0.6-0.7% deltas to lower-scoring cards indicate that the GPU's performance is within a narrow margin of its immediate competitors. This suggests that the combo's ranking is influenced more by the CPU-GPU pairing efficiency than by raw component performance alone.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset at 1080p delivers an average of 198 FPS, which is the fastest measured configuration. At 1440p, the Low preset still achieves 181 FPS, making it an excellent choice for high-refresh-rate monitors. Even at 4K, Low settings produce 130 FPS, which is playable on most displays.

The Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1080p, it delivers 175 FPS average with a minimum of 148 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense scenes. At 1440p, the Medium preset averages 137 FPS with a minimum of 117 FPS, maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The 4K Medium configuration (93 FPS average, 79 FPS minimum) is the highest quality setting that remains consistently above 60 FPS at 4K.

The High preset is a reasonable choice for 1440p gaming, providing 122 FPS average, but at 4K it drops to 82 FPS, which may cause occasional dips below 60 FPS in demanding sequences. The Ultra preset is only recommended for 1080p displays, where it achieves 140 FPS average. At 1440p Ultra (106 FPS) and 4K Ultra (72 FPS), the visual fidelity gains come at a substantial performance cost.

For the best overall experience, the Medium preset at 1440p is recommended. It delivers 137 FPS average, which exceeds the refresh rate of most 120 Hz and 144 Hz monitors, while maintaining a minimum of 117 FPS that prevents noticeable stuttering. This configuration leverages the RTX 5080's capabilities without overburdening it, and the 5700X3D's cache ensures consistent frame delivery. Players with 4K displays should choose the Medium preset (93 FPS) to stay above 60 FPS, while those prioritizing maximum performance can use Low settings at any resolution.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4100 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2617 MHz MHz
TDP 360 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 130.0
3840x2160 Medium 93.0
3840x2160 High 82.0
3840x2160 Ultra 72.0
2560x1440 Low 181.0
2560x1440 Medium 137.0
2560x1440 High 122.0
2560x1440 Ultra 106.0
1920x1080 Low 198.0
1920x1080 Medium 175.0
1920x1080 High 161.0
1920x1080 Ultra 140.0

Control with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X3D + RTX 5080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.