Control

# Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Control, a 2019 Action Adventure title. Across the measured configurations, the combo produces average frame rates ranging from 32.2 FPS at 4K Ultra to 117.9 FPS at 1080p Low. The data shows this pairing sits at rank 1175 out of 1636 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the field. The CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM capacity shape the results, with settings and resolution having a far larger impact on playability than the processor's headroom.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from the 7000 series, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 via a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and the chip uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform with PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

In Control, the CPU's role is modest because the game's performance ceilings at higher resolutions are primarily set by the GPU. Benchmark results show the Ryzen 5 7500F achieves a single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and a multi-thread score of 6376 in the 16-thread test, with Cinebench R23 scores of 3218 single-core and 22799 multi-core. These figures indicate strong per-core capability, which supports consistent frame pacing in an action game like Control. The CPU's percentile rank is 82 among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24993. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (deltaPct 0.1) and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (deltaPct -0.3), meaning the 7500F performs nearly identically to those parts in synthetic tests. For this game, the data suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck at any measured setting, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution and GPU load.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. It features 4864 shading units, 152 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, with a 200 W TDP and a suggested 550 W power supply.

The RTX 3060 Ti's role in Control is dominant, as the measured FPS values show a clear dependency on GPU load rather than CPU capability. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 20349, with a percentile rank of 69 among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 25120. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700M (deltaPct -0.2) and AMD Radeon RX 6600 (deltaPct -0.5), indicating the 3060 Ti is slightly below those parts in raw compute metrics. In Control, the 8 GB VRAM capacity becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings, as evidenced by the steep drop from 1080p to 4K. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 16.20 TFLOPS provides adequate raw power, but the data shows that memory bandwidth and capacity constrain performance more than compute at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?

A: The measured data shows 1920x1080 provides the highest average frame rates across all settings, ranging from 67 FPS at Ultra to 117.9 FPS at Low. At 2560x1440, average FPS ranges from 51.8 (Ultra) to 91.4 (Low), while 3840x2160 drops to between 32.2 (Ultra) and 59.9 (Low).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24993, which is 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-11850H (24974) and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (25057). In practical terms, these differences are negligible for gaming performance.

Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM sufficient for Control at 4K?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 8 GB is not sufficient for smooth 4K play. At 3840x2160, the average FPS is 39.5 at High and 32.2 at Ultra, indicating the GPU struggles with memory capacity and bandwidth at this resolution.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has a percentile rank of 69, meaning it outperforms 69% of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 25120, placing it just below the AMD Radeon RX 6600 with a deltaPct of -0.5.

Q: How does the combo rank overall in Control compared to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 1175 out of 1636 tested combinations in Control, placing it in the 72nd percentile of the tested pool. This suggests it performs below the median of all tested systems for this specific game.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS drops from 117.9 at Low to 67 at Ultra, a difference of 50.9 FPS. This indicates that Ultra settings impose a significant rendering load that nearly halves the frame rate compared to Low.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1175 out of 1636 tested combinations places this system in the lower third of the performance spectrum for Control. With a rank percentage of 71.8% (meaning it outperforms roughly 28% of tested combos), this pairing is not optimized for the game's highest visual demands. The data shows that the gap between this combo and higher-ranked systems likely stems from the GPU's 8 GB VRAM limitation and its mid-tier compute performance, rather than the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7500F's synthetic scores (82nd percentile) are significantly higher than the GPU's (69th percentile), indicating the processor has headroom to support a more powerful graphics card. In Control, the combo's rank reflects the GPU's inability to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra, where it drops to 32.2 FPS. The measured results suggest that users seeking better rankings would need a GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth, as the CPU side is not the limiting factor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. Low settings produce an average of 117.9 FPS, Medium yields 81.3 FPS, High drops to 77.7 FPS, and Ultra reaches 67 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 50.9 FPS, showing that settings scaling has a pronounced effect at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, frame rates decrease but remain playable. Low settings average 91.4 FPS, Medium 62.8 FPS, High 53.4 FPS, and Ultra 51.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 39.6 FPS, indicating that resolution scaling begins to flatten the settings curve as the GPU becomes more constrained.

At 3840x2160, performance drops significantly. Low settings average 59.9 FPS, Medium 41.7 FPS, High 39.5 FPS, and Ultra 32.2 FPS. The Ultra result is below the generally accepted 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and even Low settings barely reach 60 FPS. Across all resolutions, the data shows a consistent pattern: Low settings provide the highest frame rates, while Ultra imposes the heaviest load, and the absolute performance gap between settings shrinks as resolution increases.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience per the measured rows, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, High settings (77.7 FPS) offer a strong balance between visual quality and smoothness, while Medium (81.3 FPS) provides a slight FPS boost with minimal visual compromise. Ultra at 67 FPS is playable but approaches the lower bound for high-refresh displays.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings (62.8 FPS) are the recommended choice, as they maintain a stable frame rate above 60 FPS while preserving moderate visual fidelity. High settings (53.4 FPS) are acceptable for slower-paced moments but may feel less fluid during action sequences. Low settings (91.4 FPS) are the only option for achieving high refresh rates at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the data suggests that Low settings (59.9 FPS) are the only viable option for approaching smooth gameplay. Medium (41.7 FPS) and High (39.5 FPS) are playable but noticeably less fluid, while Ultra (32.2 FPS) is not recommended for action scenes. Users prioritizing visual quality over frame rate may choose Medium at 4K, but the measured results indicate that this combo is best suited to 1080p or 1440p with Medium or High settings for a responsive Control experience.