Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
87
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 87 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 43 51 58 80
1440p QHD 68 75 85 119
1080p Full HD 86 103 115 157

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 80
3840x2160 Medium 58
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Ultra 43
2560x1440 Low 119
2560x1440 Medium 85
2560x1440 High 75
2560x1440 Ultra 68
1920x1080 Low 157
1920x1080 Medium 115
1920x1080 High 103
1920x1080 Ultra 86

Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, but 4K Ultra demands compromise. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: at 1080p, the combo averages 157.4 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 102.6 FPS on High, and further to 86.2 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, the same preset ladder yields 119 FPS (Low), 75.4 FPS (High), and 68 FPS (Ultra). At 4K, the frame rates compress significantly: 79.5 FPS on Low, 57.9 FPS on Medium, 51.3 FPS on High, and 42.9 FPS on Ultra. This pattern indicates that the RTX 3070’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s Zen 4 architecture has ample headroom.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show that resolution scaling is steep but not uniform across presets. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drop is roughly 25% for Low settings (157.4 to 119 FPS), 26% for High (102.6 to 75.4 FPS), and 21% for Ultra (86.2 to 68 FPS). The transition from 1440p to 4K is more punishing: Low settings fall 33% (119 to 79.5 FPS), High falls 32% (75.4 to 51.3 FPS), and Ultra falls 37% (68 to 42.9 FPS). This non-linear drop suggests that the GPU’s pixel throughput, rated at 165.6 GPixel/s, becomes the limiting factor as pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K.

The gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution reveals the GPU’s workload sensitivity. At 1080p, Low (157.4 FPS) versus Ultra (86.2 FPS) is a 71.2 FPS spread, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently even at high settings. At 1440p, the spread narrows to 51 FPS (119 vs. 68), and at 4K it tightens further to 36.6 FPS (79.5 vs. 42.9). This compression shows that the RTX 3070 is the bottleneck at 4K, where even dropping from Ultra to Low cannot double frame rates. The data implies that for 4K gameplay, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus are saturated, not the Ryzen 5 7500F’s 6 cores and 12 threads.

GPU Role

The RTX 3070’s specifications directly explain its behavior in Control. With 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, the GPU has substantial compute capacity, reflected in its 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance. However, the 8 GB GDDR6 memory, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) on a 256-bit bus, delivers 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. In Control, which features heavy particle effects and destructible environments, this bandwidth is the likely culprit for the 4K Ultra result of 42.9 FPS. The GPU’s 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores are present, but the benchmark data does not isolate ray tracing performance; the measured rows are purely rasterized presets.

The GPU’s clock behavior is straightforward: base 1500 MHz, boost 1725 MHz. These clocks remain consistent across resolutions, meaning the FPS variance is not due to clock throttling but to memory pressure. The 4K Low result of 79.5 FPS versus 1440p Low of 119 FPS shows a 39.5 FPS drop, which is larger than the 1080p to 1440p drop of 38.4 FPS. This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is waiting on memory fetches, not compute. The RTX 3070’s 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs (avg benchmark score 28238) places it above the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (27985, +0.9% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (27956, +1% delta), but below the AMD FirePro S7150 (28409, -0.6% delta). In practical terms, the GPU is a mid-to-high tier part that excels at 1080p and 1440p but struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra in this title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal preset depends on the target resolution and frame rate. At 1080p, all presets are playable: Low (157.4 FPS), Medium (115.2 FPS), High (102.6 FPS), and Ultra (86.2 FPS). For a 60 Hz display, High offers a 42.6 FPS headroom over the threshold, making it the best balance of visual quality and performance. For 144 Hz displays, Medium (115.2 FPS) is the highest preset that stays above 100 FPS, while High (75.4 FPS) is still above 60 FPS. At 1440p, the situation changes: Low (119 FPS) and Medium (84.5 FPS) are smooth, High (75.4 FPS) is playable, but Ultra (68 FPS) dips close to 60 FPS territory. For a 1440p/144 Hz monitor, Medium is the recommended ceiling.

At 4K, the data suggests a strict tiering. Low (79.5 FPS) is the only preset that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for smooth gameplay. Medium (57.9 FPS) and High (51.3 FPS) are below 60 FPS, and Ultra (42.9 FPS) is only suitable for 30-40 Hz displays or for players who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate. The 4K High to Ultra gap (51.3 to 42.9 FPS, an 8.4 FPS difference) is smaller than the Medium to High gap (57.9 to 51.3, a 6.6 FPS difference), suggesting diminishing returns at the top end. For 4K gaming, the data indicates that Low settings are necessary to maintain a consistent 60+ FPS, as the GPU’s memory bandwidth cannot sustain higher presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 745th out of 1636 tested combinations in Control, placing it in the 54th percentile of all combos. This mid-pack ranking reflects a balanced pairing: the Ryzen 5 7500F is a strong CPU (82nd percentile among all CPUs) while the RTX 3070 is above average (72nd percentile among all GPUs). The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24974, +0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (25057, -0.3% delta), and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25064, -0.3% delta), showing the 7500F is essentially tied with these parts. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro S7150 (28409, -0.6% delta), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (27985, +0.9% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (27956, +1% delta), again a tight cluster.

The ranking of 745/1636 suggests that while this combo is not a top-tier performer in Control, it is far from a weak pairing. The measured data shows the combo can deliver 102.6 FPS at 1080p High and 75.4 FPS at 1440p High, which are strong results for a mid-range system. The 4K Ultra result of 42.9 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold, but the combo’s overall rank is dragged down by this resolution. In comparison to other combos in the database, the 7500F + RTX 3070 is a coherent match: the CPU’s 3.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clocks provide enough single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score 974) to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions. The combo’s rank indicates it outperforms roughly half of all tested configurations, making it a dependable choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p High settings?

A: The combo averages 102.6 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold and suitable for 144 Hz displays.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K Ultra in Control?*

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 42.9 FPS, which is below 60 FPS. For 4K, Low settings (79.5 FPS) are required for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT?

A: The RTX 3070 has a higher average benchmark score (28238 vs. 27985) with a delta of +0.9% relative to the RX 6600 XT, indicating a slight performance edge.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests no. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 157.4 FPS, and at 1080p Ultra it drops to 86.2 FPS, showing the GPU is the limiting factor at high settings.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p 60 Hz displays?

A: High settings (75.4 FPS) provide a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Ultra (68 FPS) is also playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 745th out of 1636 combos in Control, placing it in the upper-middle range. The CPU ranks in the 82nd percentile and the GPU in the 72nd percentile among their respective parts.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 1725 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 79.5
3840x2160 Medium 57.9
3840x2160 High 51.3
3840x2160 Ultra 42.9
2560x1440 Low 119.0
2560x1440 Medium 84.5
2560x1440 High 75.4
2560x1440 Ultra 68.0
1920x1080 Low 157.4
1920x1080 Medium 115.2
1920x1080 High 102.6
1920x1080 Ultra 86.2

Control with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + RTX 3070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.