Archeage

Archeage

AVERAGE FPS
81
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 38 56 63
1440p QHD 45 66 98 110
1080p Full HD 67 98 145 163

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 63
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 High 38
3840x2160 Ultra 26
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 98
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Ultra 45
1920x1080 Low 163
1920x1080 Medium 145
1920x1080 High 98
1920x1080 Ultra 67

Archeage with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis

# Archeage with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Archeage. Benchmark data shows this combo ranks 1222nd out of 2761 tested configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier for this MMORPG. The most striking finding is the dramatic performance cliff at 4K Ultra settings, where average FPS collapses to 26, while 1080p Low settings achieve 163 FPS. This indicates a system that scales predictably with resolution but struggles to maintain high frame rates at maximum graphical fidelity.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a system increasingly bound by the GPU as pixel count rises. At Low settings, the progression is 163 FPS at 1920x1080, dropping to 110 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 63 FPS at 3840x2160. That represents a 61% reduction from 1080p to 4K on Low settings, suggesting the RTX 5060's 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus become limiting factors at higher resolutions. The scaling from 1440p to 4K on Low (110 to 63 FPS, a 43% drop) is steeper than the 1080p to 1440p drop (163 to 110, a 33% reduction), indicating that pixel throughput demands accelerate disproportionately at 4K.

Medium settings tell a similar story. The measured rows show 145 FPS at 1080p, 98 FPS at 1440p, and 56 FPS at 4K. The 1080p-to-1440p drop is 47 FPS (32%), while the 1440p-to-4K drop is 42 FPS (43%). This pattern confirms that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become increasingly strained as resolution climbs. At High settings, the same trend continues: 98 FPS at 1080p, 66 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. The 4K High result falls below the 40 FPS threshold commonly considered minimum for smooth gameplay.

Ultra settings expose the most severe scaling penalty. At 1080p Ultra, the system manages 67 FPS, which drops to 45 FPS at 1440p, and plummets to 26 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below 30 FPS, making it effectively unplayable for action-oriented content. The scaling from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra (45 to 26 FPS, a 42% drop) mirrors the pattern seen at other settings, but the absolute numbers are so low that even the percentage improvement from lowering resolution does not rescue the experience.

The data indicates that Archeage at this hardware combination is primarily GPU-limited at resolutions above 1080p. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, does not appear to be the bottleneck, as evidenced by the consistent FPS improvements when lowering graphical settings at each resolution. If the CPU were the limiting factor, reducing resolution would yield diminishing returns; instead, the FPS scales nearly linearly with pixel count, a hallmark of GPU-bound rendering.

GPU Role

The RTX 5060's specifications directly explain the measured performance envelope. With 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, the card has enough throughput for 1080p and 1440p gaming but struggles at 4K, particularly with higher-quality textures and effects. The base clock of 2280 MHz and boost clock of 2497 MHz provide the computational foundation, but the 48 ROPs and 120 TMUs are modest for 4K rasterization, which explains why 4K Ultra averages only 26 FPS.

The GPU's benchmark scores contextualize its position. The PassMark G3D score of 20891 and average benchmark score of 26331 place it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3% delta), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.8%), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011, +1.2%). These deltas are all within 1.2% of the RTX 5060's average score, indicating that this card sits in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences matter less than memory capacity and bandwidth.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 113321 suggest the GPU handles modern APIs competently, yet the DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 PassMark scores (225 and 200 respectively) reveal that older API workloads, like those potentially found in Archeage's engine, may not fully utilize the Blackwell architecture's strengths. The DirectX 12 score of 77 is notably lower, which could indicate driver overhead or engine-specific inefficiencies. The GPU compute score of 10899 and FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS provide adequate compute headroom, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity is the most likely constraint at 4K, where texture streaming and draw calls demand more memory than the card can supply without thrashing.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows point to Medium settings as the optimal balance for most users. At 1920x1080 Medium, the system delivers 145 FPS average with a minimum of 123 and maximum of 167, providing smooth gameplay with some visual fidelity. At 2560x1440 Medium, the average drops to 98 FPS with a minimum of 83 and maximum of 112, still comfortably above 60 FPS. Even at 4K Medium, the 56 FPS average with 47 FPS minimum is borderline playable, though users with 60 Hz displays will notice occasional dips.

High settings offer diminishing returns relative to Medium. At 1080p High, the 98 FPS average is 47 FPS lower than Medium, yet the visual difference in a fast-paced MMORPG may not justify the performance loss. At 1440p High, 66 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for crowded zones or large-scale PvP encounters. At 4K High, the 38 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS standard, making this setting combination unsuitable for competitive play.

Ultra settings are only viable at 1080p, where 67 FPS is acceptable for casual play. At 1440p Ultra, 45 FPS is marginal, and at 4K Ultra, 26 FPS is effectively unplayable. The data strongly suggests that users should avoid Ultra settings at any resolution above 1080p with this hardware. For 4K displays, Low settings at 63 FPS provide the only smooth experience, but the visual compromises are severe. Medium settings at 1440p offer the best quality-to-performance ratio, delivering near-100 FPS with decent visual fidelity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full settings range from 67 FPS at Ultra to 163 FPS at Low. Medium achieves 145 FPS average (min 123, max 167), while High produces 98 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 18 FPS (163 to 145), while the gap from Medium to High is 47 FPS (145 to 98), and from High to Ultra is 31 FPS (98 to 67). This nonlinear scaling indicates that each settings tier imposes progressively larger rendering costs, likely tied to shadow quality, draw distance, and texture filtering.

At 2560x1440, the same settings ladder shows 110 FPS at Low, 98 FPS at Medium (min 83, max 112), 66 FPS at High, and 45 FPS at Ultra. The Medium-to-High drop of 32 FPS is proportionally similar to the 1080p result, but the Low-to-Medium gap narrows to just 12 FPS (110 to 98), suggesting that at 1440p, the GPU begins to feel memory bandwidth pressure even at lower settings.

At 3840x2160, the results are 63 FPS at Low, 56 FPS at Medium (min 47, max 64), 38 FPS at High, and 26 FPS at Ultra. The Low-to-Medium drop is only 7 FPS, while Medium-to-High costs 18 FPS, and High-to-Ultra costs 12 FPS. The 4K results show that even the lowest settings cannot reach 60 FPS, and the minimum FPS of 47 at Medium indicates occasional stutters that would be noticeable in combat.

The complete dataset shows that the RTX 5060 can handle 1080p at any settings, 1440p at Medium or lower, and 4K only at Low settings. The only measured frame time variance is at Medium settings, where the 1080p range (123-167) and 1440p range (83-112) demonstrate consistent frame pacing, while the 4K range (47-64) shows wider fluctuations, likely due to memory pressure.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Archeage at 4K smoothly?

A: Only at Low settings, where it averages 63 FPS. At Medium settings, the average drops to 56 FPS with a minimum of 47 FPS, which may cause noticeable stutters. High and Ultra settings at 4K produce 38 FPS and 26 FPS respectively, which are not suitable for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware combo?

A: 2560x1440 at Medium settings offers the best balance, delivering 98 FPS average with an 83 FPS minimum and 112 FPS maximum. This provides smooth gameplay while maintaining acceptable visual quality. 1920x1080 at Medium achieves 145 FPS but the visual upgrade to 1440p is substantial for only a 47 FPS cost.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rival GPUs?

A: The RTX 5060's average benchmark score of 26331 is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3%). It sits 0.8% below the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553) and 1.2% above the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011). These differences are negligible in real-world gaming.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Archeage?

A: The data suggests it is sufficient at 1080p and 1440p, where the 8 GB GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 4K, the 26 FPS Ultra result and the 47 FPS minimum at Medium indicate that memory capacity or bandwidth becomes a limiting factor, as frame rates drop disproportionately compared to lower resolutions.

Q: What settings should I choose for 1440p gaming?

A: Medium settings are recommended, providing 98 FPS average with a minimum of 83 FPS. High settings drop to 66 FPS average, which is still playable but leaves less headroom for busy areas. Ultra at 45 FPS is not recommended for fast-paced gameplay.

Q: How does the CPU performance affect Archeage?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, ranks at the 89th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46062. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030, +0.1% delta) and Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098, -0.1%), indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck in this configuration.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 provides substantial processing headroom for Archeage, a game that is not typically CPU-intensive in isolated benchmarks but can become demanding in crowded multiplayer environments. With 14 cores and 14 threads, the CPU offers parallel processing capability that handles background tasks and game logic simultaneously. The base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz deliver strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085 and PassMark single-thread score of 4516.

The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are equally robust. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and R20 score of 6202 demonstrate sustained performance under load. The PassMark multi-thread score of 37816 and physics score of 2570 indicate that the CPU can handle complex simulations and physics calculations without becoming a bottleneck. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample data locality for game assets, reducing memory access latency.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46062, places it in the upper echelon of processors. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.2% of its score: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46030 (+0.1%), Intel Core i9-13900HX at 46098 (-0.1%), AMD EPYC 4364P at 45970 (+0.2%), and AMD EPYC 7303 at 45960 (+0.2%). This tight clustering suggests that any of these CPUs would deliver virtually identical gaming performance in Archeage, confirming that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates in this configuration.

The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 is adequate for feeding the 14 cores, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes ensures the RTX 5060's PCIe 5.0 x8 connection is not a limiting factor. The CPU's 17,800 million transistors on a 3 nm TSMC process with a 65 W TDP indicate efficient power delivery, though the lack of an unlocked multiplier limits overclocking potential. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU is present but irrelevant for gaming when the discrete GPU is installed. Overall, the CPU role in this Archeage configuration is supportive rather than decisive, as the measured FPS scaling with resolution and settings clearly attributes performance variation to the GPU.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2497 MHz MHz
TDP 145 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Archeage

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 63.0
3840x2160 Medium 56.0
3840x2160 High 38.0
3840x2160 Ultra 26.0
2560x1440 Low 110.0
2560x1440 Medium 98.0
2560x1440 High 66.0
2560x1440 Ultra 45.0
1920x1080 Low 163.0
1920x1080 Medium 145.0
1920x1080 High 98.0
1920x1080 Ultra 67.0

Archeage with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs

See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Archeage with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs

See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RTX 5060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.