Archeage

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with Intel Arc B390 produces a profoundly GPU-limited experience in Archeage. The data shows a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a 4.90 GHz boost clock and 64 MB of L3 cache, yet the Intel Arc B390, an integrated graphics solution with a 300 MHz base and 2500 MHz boost clock, restricts performance to an average of 71 FPS at best in the measured scenarios. This combination ranks 3297th out of 3708 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 11% of all configurations. The benchmark results indicate that the processor's capabilities are largely untapped, as the GPU's System Shared memory and 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 throughput create a bottleneck that dominates every resolution and preset tested. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, examines the GPU and CPU roles, and provides actionable settings recommendations based solely on the provided facts.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS recorded for this combo in Archeage?

A: The highest average FPS is 71, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next best is 64 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, followed by 48 FPS at 2560x1440 with Low settings.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rival in GPU benchmarks?

A: The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482, which is 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (score 1463) and 1.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (score 1460). It also leads the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446) by 2.5% and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443) by 2.7%.

Q: What is the combo's rank relative to all other tested combinations in this game?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + Intel Arc B390 combo ranks 3297th out of 3708 tested combos. This places it in the bottom portion of the database, indicating that most other pairings deliver higher performance in Archeage.

Q: Does the CPU show strength in multi-threaded or single-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU's benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 and a Geekbench multicore score of 15233. Its single-thread scores are lower by comparison, with a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 1614 and a Geekbench singlecore score of 2083.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect performance?

A: The Intel Arc B390 uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. The memory bus width and bandwidth are also listed as "System Shared" and "System Dependent" respectively, indicating that performance is tied to the system's main memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The lowest average FPS is 11, recorded at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. The next lowest is 17 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, and 20 FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 3297 out of 3708 is a stark indicator of where this pairing sits in the performance hierarchy for Archeage. This position, within the bottom 11% of all tested combinations, signals that the Intel Arc B390 integrated GPU is the primary limiting factor. The data suggests that the vast majority of other CPU+GPU pairings in the database achieve higher frame rates, which is consistent with the Arc B390's GPU percentile of 9, meaning it performs better than only 9% of all GPUs. In contrast, the CPU's percentile is 91, outperforming 91% of all CPUs. This disparity between a top-tier CPU and a bottom-tier GPU creates an extreme bottleneck, where the system's overall capability is effectively capped by the weakest component.

The implications are clear when examining the nearest rivals of the GPU. The Arc B390's average benchmark score of 1482 is only 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, a legacy mobile GPU. This indicates that the Arc B390 is not just a low performer; it is in a class with hardware from a much older generation. The CPU, on the other hand, has an average benchmark score of 51947, which is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700 (score 52301) and 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-13900F (score 51730). These rival comparisons show a CPU that competes with modern high-end desktop processors, yet its potential is completely squandered by the GPU in this combo. The rank of 3297 is not a reflection of the CPU's ability but rather the GPU's inability to translate that processing power into playable frame rates in Archeage.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. Its clock speeds are modest, with a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2500 MHz. The GPU's memory configuration is entirely System Shared, meaning it relies on the system's main memory instead of dedicated VRAM. This has a direct impact on performance in a game like Archeage, which likely requires frequent texture and asset loading; the "System Dependent" bandwidth is a critical weakness, as it ties performance to the memory bandwidth of the host system rather than a dedicated high-speed VRAM bus.

With 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, the Arc B390 has a raw compute capability of 7.680 TFLOPS FP32. While this sounds numerically significant, its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482 places it at the 9th percentile of all GPUs. This low percentile is reflected in the measured FPS data, where even at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo only reaches 71 FPS. The GPU's role as the primary bottleneck is evident; it cannot push frame rates high enough to leverage the CPU's power. The fact that the GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and GT 710, both ancient by modern standards, confirms that the Arc B390 is not a gaming-oriented solution, making it a poor match for Archeage's demands.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves its best results. With Low settings, the average FPS is 71, which is the highest recorded in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 64 FPS, with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 73. High settings yield an average of 43 FPS, while Ultra settings dramatically reduce performance to an average of 29 FPS. This shows a clear scaling pattern where each step up in settings from Low to Ultra reduces performance, but the jump from High to Ultra is particularly steep, representing a 14 FPS drop.

At 2560x1440, the performance degradation is significant. Low settings produce an average of 48 FPS, which is a 23 FPS drop from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 43 FPS (with a min of 36 and max of 49), while High settings average 29 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution fall to an average of 20 FPS, which is barely playable. The 3840x2160 resolution shows the most severe limitations. Low settings average 28 FPS, Medium settings average 25 FPS (with a min of 21 and max of 28), and High settings average 17 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K are nearly unplayable, with an average of just 11 FPS. This data reveals that the combo can only approach playable frame rates at 1080p with Low or Medium settings, and even then, it struggles to maintain a consistent 60 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the user's target resolution and tolerance for frame rate drops. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance, with an average of 64 FPS and a minimum of 54 FPS. This is the only configuration that provides a playable experience while maintaining visual quality above Low. The Low preset achieves 71 FPS, but the visual fidelity is likely too poor for a modern MMORPG. High settings at 1080p drop to 43 FPS, which is a significant downgrade, and Ultra at 29 FPS is not recommended for any gameplay that requires responsiveness.

For users with 2560x1440 monitors, the situation is more complex. The Low preset at 48 FPS is the only option that remains above 45 FPS, but it sacrifices visual quality. The Medium preset at 43 FPS (with a min of 36) is a viable alternative if the user can tolerate occasional dips below 40 FPS. High settings at 29 FPS and Ultra at 20 FPS are not recommended for anything beyond static screenshots. At 3840x2160, no settings preset provides a playable experience. The Low preset at 28 FPS is the best option, but it is still below the 30 FPS threshold generally considered the minimum for playability. The data suggests that users should stick to 1080p with Medium settings as the primary recommendation, as it offers the highest FPS with a measurable min/max range that stays above 54 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 105W. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache. In CPU benchmarks, it scores 26017 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4324 in Cinebench R15 multicore, while its single-core scores are 1614 in Cinebench R23 and 266.5 in Cinebench R15. The CPU's percentile of 91 indicates it is a high-end performer, and its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (score 52073, delta -0.2%) and the Intel Core i7-14700 (score 52301, delta -0.7%).

In Archeage, which is an MMORPG, CPU performance is often critical for handling large player populations, complex game logic, and network processing. The 5950X's 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with its high boost clock, should provide ample headroom for such tasks. The benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its Passmark multithread score of 45424 and 3DMark max threads score of 11597. However, the measured FPS data indicates that the CPU's capabilities are never fully utilized. The fact that the combo ranks so low in the game-specific benchmark, despite the CPU's high percentile, strongly suggests that the GPU is the sole limiting factor. The CPU is likely sitting idle while waiting for the GPU to render frames, meaning that upgrading the GPU would yield a massive performance improvement, while the CPU's contribution to frame rate is effectively negligible in this specific configuration.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K provides critical insight into the system's bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 71. This drops to 48 FPS at 2560x1440, a 32% reduction, and further to 28 FPS at 3840x2160, a 61% reduction from the 1080p baseline. A similar pattern is observed at Medium settings, where the FPS goes from 64 at 1080p to 43 at 1440p and 25 at 4K, representing a 33% and 61% drop respectively. This scaling is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where increasing the resolution directly increases the pixel count and thus the GPU's rendering workload.

The data implies that the Intel Arc B390 is the limiting component, as its performance degrades sharply with resolution. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar FPS numbers across different resolutions, since the CPU's workload does not scale with pixel count. Instead, the FPS halves at 4K compared to 1080p, which is a textbook sign of a GPU that is overwhelmed by the increased rendering demands. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data, but its 16 cores and 4.90 GHz boost clock are far more than enough to handle Archeage's logic at any resolution. The resolution scaling data confirms that the GPU is the primary constraint, and that any attempt to improve performance at higher resolutions would require a more powerful dedicated graphics card, not a faster processor.