Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores
ECC MemoryAt a Glance
IntelIntel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 features 6 physical cores and 12 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
E5-1650 v4 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Xeon E5-1650 v4 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Xeon E5-1650 v4 by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
Intel's Xeon E5-1650 v4 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the E5-1650 v4 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Xeon E5-1650 v4's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Broadwell Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 is built on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in E5-1650 v4 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Broadwell Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
E5-1650 v4 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 140W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
Intel Socket 2011-3 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 uses the Intel Socket 2011-3 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
Intel Socket 2011-3 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the E5-1650 v4 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Xeon E5-1650 v4 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Xeon E5-1650 v4 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Xeon E5-1650 v4 by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.
Xeon E5-1650 v4 Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 performs in parallel rendering workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performerscinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 handles tasks that can't be parallelized.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
About Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a six-core, twelve-thread Broadwell-EP processor built on Intel’s 14 nm process, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. It targets the desktop segment on Socket 2011-3, carries a 140 W TDP, and supports quad-channel DDR4 memory with ECC. Its average benchmark score of 2797 places it in the 53rd percentile of all CPUs tested, making it a solidly mid-pack performer for its generation.
Benchmark Performance
The data from Cinebench shows a processor that is clearly skewed toward multi-threaded workloads, though its single-core numbers are respectable for the era. In Cinebench R23, the E5-1650 v4 scores 9673 points multi-core and 1365 points single-core. The multi-core result is roughly 7.1x the single-core figure, indicating that the six physical cores with Hyper-Threading scale well under sustained load. The R20 results follow the same pattern: 4062 multi-core versus 573 single-core. In the older R15 test, it scores 974 multi-core and 137 single-core.
Against its nearest rivals, the E5-1650 v4 is effectively tied at the top of its immediate peer group. Its average benchmark score of 2797 is a mere 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon E-2324G (2795), 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U (2792), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3 (2789), and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i5-8600K (2783). These deltas are within noise for most workloads, meaning the E5-1650 v4 offers no meaningful performance advantage over any of these chips in aggregate. However, the composition of that score matters: the E5-1650 v4 achieves parity with newer quad-core parts through its extra cores and threads, not through superior IPC.
The single-core scores tell a clearer story. A Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1365 is modest by modern standards, and it lags behind what newer architectures deliver per clock. The boost clock of 4.00 GHz helps, but the Broadwell architecture cannot match the instruction-per-clock efficiency of later Intel or AMD designs. In multi-threaded tasks, the 6-core/12-thread configuration provides enough parallelism to keep pace with the 4-core rivals listed, but it does not decisively beat them.
Platform and Compatibility
The E5-1650 v4 uses Intel Socket 2011-3, a platform designed for high-end desktop and entry-level server parts. It is built on the Broadwell-EP architecture, which is the second generation of Intel's Xeon E5 v4 family on this socket. The processor supports quad-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is critical for workstation stability and data integrity in long-running compute tasks.
PCIe connectivity is provided by 40 Gen 3 lanes from the CPU. This is a generous allocation for the time, allowing multiple GPUs or NVMe drives to be run at full bandwidth without contention. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is expected for this class of processor. The memory bus is quad-channel, which is a significant advantage over mainstream desktop platforms that use dual-channel memory; this directly benefits memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications like rendering and scientific computing.
The production status is end-of-life, so new units are not being manufactured. However, the Socket 2011-3 platform offers a defined upgrade path within the same socket family: compatible Xeon E5 v3 and v4 parts can be swapped in, provided the motherboard BIOS supports them. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not available; users must rely on the factory boost behavior of up to 4.00 GHz.
Power and Thermals
The TDP is rated at 140 W. This is a high figure for a six-core processor, and it reflects the older 14 nm process and the need to sustain 4.00 GHz boost clocks across multiple cores. For cooling, this TDP class requires a capable air cooler or a basic liquid cooler; a stock Intel cooler will not suffice. The 246 mm² die size and 3,400 million transistor count mean heat density is moderate, but the large socket and dual-channel memory layout allow for good heat spread if the cooler mounting is adequate.
In practice, the 140 W TDP means the processor will draw significant power under full load, and system builders should ensure the motherboard VRM can handle sustained current delivery. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means there is no headroom for voltage or frequency tuning, so the thermal solution only needs to handle stock operation. Idle power draw will be lower, but the platform-level power consumption (chipset, memory, PCIe devices) will still be notable. Users migrating from lower-TDP desktop parts should budget for a stronger cooling solution and a PSU with sufficient headroom for the CPU's peak draw.
How It Compares
Intel Xeon E-2324G: This is the closest competitor, with an average score of 2795 versus 2797 for the E5-1650 v4 — a 0.1% difference that is effectively a tie. The E-2324G is a newer, 4-core part, so its per-core performance is superior, but the E5-1650 v4 compensates with 12 threads versus 8. In heavily threaded workloads, the E5-1650 v4 will pull ahead; in single-threaded tasks, the E-2324G will win. For mixed workloads, the difference is negligible.
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U: This mobile APU scores 2792, which is 0.2% behind the E5-1650 v4. The Ryzen 3 is a 4-core/8-thread part with integrated graphics, and its efficiency is far better due to a much lower TDP. However, the E5-1650 v4 offers more PCIe lanes, quad-channel memory, and ECC support, which makes it a better fit for workstation builds despite the similar benchmark score. The Ryzen 3 will dominate in power efficiency and single-thread tasks, but the Xeon offers platform features that the mobile chip cannot match.
Intel Xeon E5-4627 v3: With a score of 2789, this rival trails by 0.3%. The E5-4627 v3 is also a Broadwell-EP part, but it has fewer threads and a lower clock speed profile, which explains the small gap. Both processors share the same platform traits (Socket 2011-3, quad-channel DDR4, ECC), but the E5-1650 v4 has a higher boost clock and better multi-threaded performance. For users already on this socket, the E5-1650 v4 is the stronger pick.
Intel Core i5-8600K: The i5-8600K scores 2783, which is 0.5% behind the E5-1650 v4. The i5 is a 6-core/6-thread part with no Hyper-Threading, and it runs at higher clocks on a newer architecture. In single-threaded tasks, the i5-8600K will be noticeably faster, but the E5-1650 v4’s 12 threads give it an edge in multi-threaded rendering and encoding. The Xeon also supports ECC and quad-channel memory, while the i5 is limited to dual-channel and no ECC. For pure gaming, the i5 is better; for workstation tasks, the Xeon is more capable.
Who Should Consider It
The benchmark data indicates this processor is best suited for multi-threaded workstation workloads that can leverage 12 threads and quad-channel memory bandwidth. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9673 puts it in a range where it can handle 3D rendering, video encoding, and batch photo processing without choking, though it will not match modern high-core-count parts. Users building a dedicated rendering or simulation machine on a budget-friendly used platform will find the E5-1650 v4 adequate, provided they pair it with a good cooler and a motherboard that supports ECC RAM.
For gaming, the single-core score of 1365 in Cinebench R23 is a limiting factor. Many modern games are still sensitive to single-thread performance, and the E5-1650 v4 will be a bottleneck in CPU-bound titles compared to newer six-core parts like the i5-8600K, which matches its multi-core score but has better per-core performance. The 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes are enough for a single high-end GPU, but the overall gaming experience will lag behind contemporary desktop CPUs.
Office and general productivity tasks will run fine, but the 140 W TDP and lack of integrated graphics make this a poor choice for low-power or silent builds. The ECC memory support and quad-channel bandwidth are the standout features for professional use, making the E5-1650 v4 a reasonable choice for a budget workstation where data integrity is more important than raw speed. It is not a good fit for anyone prioritizing single-thread responsiveness or power efficiency.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 support ECC memory?
A: Yes, it supports ECC memory, which is enabled through the quad-channel DDR4 memory controller.
Q: What is the maximum boost clock speed?
A: The boost clock is 4.00 GHz, while the base clock is 3.60 GHz.
Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?
A: It provides 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU only.
Q: Is this processor overclockable?
A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.
Q: What socket does the E5-1650 v4 use?
A: It uses Intel Socket 2011-3.
Q: How does it compare to the Intel Core i5-8600K in multi-core performance?
A: The E5-1650 v4 scores 0.5% higher in average benchmark score (2797 vs. 2783), but the i5-8600K has better single-core performance due to its newer architecture.
The AMD Equivalent of Xeon E5-1650 v4
Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Comparisons
See how the Xeon E5-1650 v4 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Xeon E5-1650 v4 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs