Intel Core i5-2467M

The Intel Core i5-2467M is an ultra-low-power mobile processor from the Sandy Bridge generation, and benchmark data places it in the 6th percentile of all CPUs, indicating performance that is firmly entry-level by modern standards. With an average benchmark score of 435, this dual-core, four-thread part is statistically tied with its nearest rivals, showing that its primary design goal was power efficiency rather than raw computational throughput.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-2467M produces an average benchmark score of 435, which places it in the 6th percentile of all CPUs. This is a clear indicator that the processor is positioned at the very bottom of the performance spectrum, suitable only for basic computing tasks. The data reveals a significant gap between its multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 1208 being roughly 7 times higher than the single-core score of 170, though both figures are low in absolute terms.

Comparing directly to its nearest rivals, the performance deltas are minimal. The Intel Xeon E5504 matches the Core i5-2467M exactly with an average score of 435, showing a 0% difference. The AMD A10-4655M scores 434, which is 0.2% behind, while the Intel Core i3-2370M scores 437, putting the i5-2467M 0.5% behind that chip. The AMD Athlon II X3 415e scores 433, meaning the i5-2467M is 0.6% ahead. These margins are effectively negligible in real-world use, as all four processors occupy the same performance tier.

In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 507 against a single-core score of 71 shows a strong scaling advantage when both cores are utilized, but the raw numbers remain low. The Geekbench results reinforce this picture, with a multi-core score of 641 and a single-core score of 327, indicating that the processor is roughly twice as fast in multi-threaded workloads as in single-threaded ones, which is expected for a dual-core part with Hyper-Threading. The overall avgBenchmarkScore of 435 confirms that this chip delivers only a fraction of the performance found in mainstream desktop processors of its era.

Who Should Consider It

This processor is suitable only for users with the most basic computing needs. Office workloads involving word processing, spreadsheets, and email would run acceptably, given the multi-core score of 507 in Cinebench R20 and 1208 in Cinebench R23, though responsiveness may lag with heavier documents. Web browsing with multiple tabs is feasible, but the single-core score of 170 in Cinebench R23 indicates that JavaScript-heavy sites may cause noticeable stuttering.

Gaming is not a realistic use case for this chip. The low single-thread performance, as shown by the Geekbench single-core score of 327, would bottleneck even older titles. Integrated graphics are limited to Intel HD 3000, which further restricts any gaming ambition. Casual 2D games or very old 3D titles might run at reduced settings, but the processor's 6th percentile ranking makes any modern gaming experience impractical.

Content creation tasks are also out of reach. Video editing, 3D rendering, and photo processing require substantial multi-core performance, and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 507 is far too low for such workloads. The processor could handle light photo viewing and basic image editing, but any batch processing or filter application would be slow. This is a processor for a secondary laptop, a basic ultrabook, or a device where battery life is prioritized over speed.

How It Compares

Intel Xeon E5504: The Xeon E5504 is a server-oriented chip that achieves an identical average score of 435, showing a 0% delta. Despite coming from different market segments, both processors deliver the same level of overall performance. The Xeon likely has a higher core count, but the Core i5-2467M compensates with its newer architecture and more efficient clock scaling, resulting in a dead heat in benchmark results.

AMD A10-4655M: The AMD A10-4655M scores 434, which is 0.2% lower than the i5-2467M. This margin is within run-to-run variance, meaning the two chips are functionally equivalent in performance. Both are low-power mobile parts, and the data shows that AMD and Intel were producing comparable levels of efficiency during this generation.

Intel Core i3-2370M: The Core i3-2370M is the closest competitor, scoring 437, which puts the i5-2467M 0.5% behind. This is a marginal difference, but it shows that the i3 variant holds a slight edge in average performance. The i5-2467M's lower base clock of 1600 MHz likely contributes to this small deficit, as the i3 may run at a higher frequency.

AMD Athlon II X3 415e: The Athlon II X3 415e scores 433, giving the i5-2467M a 0.6% lead. This is the largest delta among the rivals, yet it remains negligible. The Athlon is a triple-core desktop chip, but the i5-2467M's higher per-core efficiency and Hyper-Threading allow it to edge out a win despite having fewer physical cores.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i5-2467M?

A: The average benchmark score is 435, which places the processor in the 6th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the Core i5-2467M compare to the Intel Core i3-2370M?

A: The Core i3-2370M scores 437, which is 0.5% higher than the i5-2467M's 435, indicating slightly better overall performance.

Q: What is the multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 1208, while the single-core score is 170.

Q: Does the processor support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported, as indicated in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the transistor count of this processor?

A: The processor contains 624 million transistors on a 149 mm² die size, manufactured on a 32 nm process node.

Q: What is the production status of the Core i5-2467M?

A: The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of 2011-05-31.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The benchmark data reveals a pronounced split between single-thread and multi-thread performance, characteristic of a dual-core processor with Hyper-Threading. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 1208 is 7.1 times the single-core score of 170, demonstrating excellent scaling when both cores and all four threads are engaged. This suggests that the processor can effectively utilize its available resources for multi-threaded tasks, even if the absolute performance is low.

However, the single-thread performance tells a different story. The Geekbench single-core score of 327 is roughly half the multi-core score of 641, indicating that the processor relies heavily on thread parallelism to achieve any reasonable throughput. For workloads that depend on single-core speed, such as older games, spreadsheet calculations, or general desktop responsiveness, the processor will struggle. The Cinebench R20 single-core score of 71 reinforces this, as it is among the lowest recorded for any processor.

The practical implication is that users should prioritize multi-threaded applications when considering this chip. Tasks that can parallelize, such as file compression, basic video encoding, or multitasking across several light applications, will see better performance relative to the processor's capabilities. Conversely, any workload that is inherently single-threaded will expose the processor's limitations, making it feel sluggish in modern environments.

Platform and Compatibility

The Core i5-2467M uses the Intel BGA 1023 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform. This means the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard, offering no upgrade path for users. The architecture is Sandy Bridge, representing the second generation of Core processors, and it is manufactured on a 32 nm process node by Intel. The die contains 624 million transistors and measures 149 mm².

Memory support is limited to DDR3 with a dual-channel memory bus, which was standard for the era. ECC memory is not supported, so this processor is unsuitable for error-critical server or workstation applications. The integrated graphics are provided by Intel HD 3000, which shares system memory and offers basic display output capabilities. The processor has a base clock of 1600 MHz, and the multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

The market segment is mobile, and the production status is end-of-life. The processor was released on 2011-05-31, and its part number is SR0D6. Users considering this platform today should be aware that there is no upgrade path, and the overall system would need to be replaced entirely to improve performance.

Power and Thermals

The Core i5-2467M has a TDP of 17 watts, placing it in the ultra-low-power category for mobile processors. This low power envelope is the defining characteristic of this chip, enabling thin and light laptop designs with passive or minimal cooling solutions. The thermal implications are modest, meaning a simple heatsink with a small fan is sufficient to keep the processor within operating temperatures under load.

Given the 17-watt TDP, the processor is well-suited for fanless or near-silent designs, as it generates minimal heat even during sustained multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 507 suggests that the processor can sustain its turbo operation for short bursts, but the base clock of 1600 MHz indicates that heavy loads will likely cause the processor to settle at lower frequencies to manage heat.

The low power draw also means that battery life in laptops can be excellent when paired with an efficient display and storage. However, the performance trade-off is severe, as the 6th percentile ranking demonstrates. Users should expect a cooling solution that is a capable air cooler, rather than any exotic liquid or vapor chamber system, and the processor's end-of-life status means that replacement parts and thermal solutions may become harder to source over time.