AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 260 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 are both 8-core mobile processors built on a 4 nm TSMC process, yet the recorded data places them in different performance tiers. The Ryzen 7 260 holds an 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 sits at the 50th percentile. The Ryzen 7 260 has an average benchmark score of 43717, whereas the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This analysis relies solely on the specification differences and the benchmark results available for the AMD part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 7 260 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither winsA nor winsB registers a value. Consequently, any performance comparison must derive from the Ryzen 7 260's standalone benchmark scores and the Snapdragon's lack of recorded results.

For the AMD Ryzen 7 260, Cinebench R23 multicore produces a score of 17211.5, while single-core reaches 1770.5. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 2747.5 and single-core is 276.5. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 28078, a single-thread score of 3736, integer math at 96737, floating point math at 59462, data compression at 351517, data encryption at 20267, extended instructions at 26544, find prime numbers at 77, physics at 1218, and random string sorting at 42383. The average benchmark score across these tests is 43717.

Without any benchmark data for the Snapdragon X1P-46-100, there is no numerical basis for a head-to-head walkthrough. The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 7 260, based on average score, are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 at 43704 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 170 at 43689 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 at 43431 (0.7% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 at 43326 (0.9% delta). These deltas indicate that the Ryzen 7 260 sits within 1% of these comparable AMD parts, confirming a consistent performance envelope for this processor generation. The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no nearest rivals listed, which further limits any comparative analysis.

The recorded data shows that the Ryzen 7 260 delivers substantial multicore throughput, with its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17211.5 being roughly 9.7 times its single-core score of 1770.5. This ratio reflects the processor's 8 cores and 16 threads working in tandem. In PassMark, the multithread score of 28078 versus the single-thread score of 3736 yields a similar scaling factor of about 7.5 times. The integer math score of 96737 and floating point math score of 59462 indicate strong arithmetic capability, while data compression at 351517 shows a particularly high throughput for that workload type.

Since the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot substantiate any performance claims for that processor. The only verifiable comparison is the percentile ranking: 88th for the Ryzen 7 260 versus 50th for the Snapdragon, a difference that places the AMD part in a higher overall performance class. No head-to-head wins can be assigned to either processor, as the data does not contain any such measurements.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point, belonging to the Ryzen 7 generation of Zen 4 Hawk Point processors. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses the Oryon codename, part of the Snapdragon X Plus generation. Both processors are manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node, but the similarities end there.

The Ryzen 7 260 has 8 cores and 16 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 also has 8 cores but only 8 threads, meaning no multithreading capability per core. This thread count difference directly impacts multitasking and heavily threaded workloads, where the Ryzen 7 260 can process twice as many threads concurrently.

Clock speeds differ notably. The Ryzen 7 260 has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The AMD part operates at higher frequencies in both states, with a 0.40 GHz advantage at base and a 1.10 GHz advantage at boost.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. The Ryzen 7 260 uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. While the Snapdragon has a larger per-core L1 allocation, the Ryzen 7 260 offers a larger total L3 cache at 16 MB versus 6 MB. The L2 configuration differs as well, with the AMD part giving each core 1 MB while the Qualcomm part allocates 12 MB per module, which likely spans multiple cores.

Memory support separates the two as well. The Ryzen 7 260 supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 supports LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, with a higher bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Qualcomm part's memory bandwidth advantage of 45.6 GB/s could benefit memory-intensive applications, although no benchmark data confirms this impact.

Neither processor supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 7 260 uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses a Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Ryzen 7 260 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The AMD part offers 8 additional PCIe lanes for expansion devices.

Integrated graphics differ by vendor. The Ryzen 7 260 includes a Radeon 780M, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 includes an Adreno X1-45. No benchmark scores exist for either integrated GPU in the database, so a performance comparison cannot be made.

The Ryzen 7 260 has a transistor count of 25,000 million and a die size of 178 mm². The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no transistor count or die size listed. The Ryzen 7 260's TDP is 45 watts, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100's TDP is 30 watts, a 15-watt difference that suggests lower power consumption for the Qualcomm part, though no efficiency metrics are recorded.

Release dates show the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 launched on 2024-09-02, while the Ryzen 7 260 launched on 2025-01-05, a gap of roughly four months. Both processors are marked as active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen 7 260 has a part number of 100-000001724, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a part number of X1P46100.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 260 is the higher-performing processor in general compute tasks, based on its 88th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 43717. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, with a 50th percentile ranking and no benchmark scores, cannot be verified as competitive in any measured workload. The Ryzen 7 260's 16 threads versus the Snapdragon's 8 threads, combined with higher boost clocks of 5.10 GHz versus 4.00 GHz, provide a structural advantage for multithreaded and single-threaded performance alike.

The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 does hold advantages in specific specification areas. Its memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s exceeds the Ryzen 7 260's 89.6 GB/s by 45.6 GB/s. Its LPDDR5X memory support may offer different power characteristics than the Ryzen 7 260's DDR5 support, though no power measurements appear in the database. The Snapdragon's lower TDP of 30 watts versus 45 watts suggests a more power-efficient design, but this remains a specification-level observation without thermal or battery life data.

For users prioritizing raw compute performance, the Ryzen 7 260 is the clear choice from the data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17211.5 and PassMark multithread score of 28078 demonstrate strong throughput that the Snapdragon cannot match, as no equivalent scores exist for it. The Ryzen 7 260's nearest rivals all fall within 1% of its average score, placing it in a well-established performance tier among AMD mobile processors.

The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 may appeal in scenarios where memory bandwidth is critical, given its 135.2 GB/s specification. However, without benchmark results, the database cannot confirm whether this bandwidth translates into real-world application wins. The 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all CPUs, which is not a competitive position against the Ryzen 7 260's 88th percentile.

The verdict from the data: the AMD Ryzen 7 260 delivers verifiable high-end performance across multiple benchmark suites, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 offers only specification-level advantages in memory bandwidth and TDP, with no measured performance to support any claim of superiority.

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the AMD Ryzen 7 260 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100?

A: Both processors have 8 cores. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has 16 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 threads. The AMD part supports simultaneous multithreading, effectively doubling its thread count.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The AMD part is faster in both metrics.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 260's 89.6 GB/s. The Snapdragon also uses LPDDR5X memory, while the Ryzen 7 260 uses DDR5.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a TDP of 30 watts. The Snapdragon is rated for lower power consumption.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 includes a Radeon 780M integrated GPU, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 includes an Adreno X1-45 integrated GPU. No benchmark scores are recorded for either GPU.

Q: How do the two processors rank among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 ranks in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 ranks in the 50th percentile. The Ryzen 7 260 also has an average benchmark score of 43717, whereas the Snapdragon has no average score recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 wins in every benchmark category where data exists, due to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 having no recorded benchmark scores. The Ryzen 7 260's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17211.5 indicates strong performance in rendering and multi-threaded computational tasks. Its PassMark integer math score of 96737 and floating point math score of 59462 show capability in arithmetic-heavy workloads, which often appear in scientific computing and financial modeling.

The Ryzen 7 260 also wins in data compression, scoring 351517 in PassMark's compression test, and data encryption, scoring 20267. These results suggest efficiency in file archiving, database operations, and security-related processing. The single-thread score of 3736 in PassMark and 1770.5 in Cinebench R23 indicate responsiveness in everyday applications like web browsing and office productivity, where single-core performance often dominates.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 wins on specification advantages that lack benchmark confirmation. Its memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s exceeds the Ryzen 7 260's 89.6 GB/s, which could benefit workloads that stream large datasets, such as video editing or data analysis. Its lower TDP of 30 watts versus 45 watts suggests a potential win in power-constrained devices, such as fanless laptops or tablets, though no thermal or battery life measurements exist in the database.

The Snapdragon's LPDDR5X memory support and its larger L1 cache of 288 KB per core versus 64 KB per core could favor certain latency-sensitive operations, but again, no benchmark data verifies this. The Ryzen 7 260's larger L3 cache of 16 MB versus 6 MB provides a win in cache-heavy workloads like database queries or virtualized environments, where shared cache capacity matters.

In terms of expansion, the Ryzen 7 260 wins with 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes compared to the Snapdragon's 12 lanes, allowing for more connected devices such as NVMe drives or external GPUs. The Ryzen 7 260 also has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which wins in bursty, short-duration tasks that rely on maximum frequency.

Based on the data, the Ryzen 7 260 wins in all measured performance categories, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 wins only in unverified specification areas like memory bandwidth, TDP, and per-core L1 cache size. Users seeking confirmed performance should rely on the Ryzen 7 260's benchmark scores.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 differ in the following specification fields:

• Threads: The Ryzen 7 260 has 16 threads, while the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 threads.
• Base Clock: The Ryzen 7 260 runs at 3.80 GHz, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 at 3.40 GHz.
• Boost Clock: The Ryzen 7 260 reaches 5.10 GHz, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 reaches 4.00 GHz.
• TDP: The Ryzen 7 260 is rated at 45 watts, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 at 30 watts.
• Socket: The Ryzen 7 260 uses AMD Socket FP8, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses Qualcomm BGA 2073.
• Architecture: The Ryzen 7 260 uses Zen 4, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses Oryon.
• Codename: The Ryzen 7 260 is Hawk Point, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 is Oryon.
• Generation: The Ryzen 7 260 is Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 Hawk Point), the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 is Snapdragon X (Plus).
• Transistors: The Ryzen 7 260 has 25,000 million, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has none listed.
• Die Size: The Ryzen 7 260 measures 178 mm², the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has none listed.
• L1 Cache: The Ryzen 7 260 has 64 KB per core, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 288 KB per core.
• L2 Cache: The Ryzen 7 260 has 1 MB per core, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 12 MB per module.
• L3 Cache: The Ryzen 7 260 has 16 MB shared, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 6 MB shared.
• Memory Support: The Ryzen 7 260 uses DDR5, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses LPDDR5X.
• Memory Bandwidth: The Ryzen 7 260 has 89.6 GB/s, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 135.2 GB/s.
• PCIe: The Ryzen 7 260 has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has Gen 4 with 12 lanes.
• Integrated Graphics: The Ryzen 7 260 has Radeon 780M, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has Adreno X1-45.
• Release Date: The Ryzen 7 260 launched on 2025-01-05, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 on 2024-09-02.
• Part Number: The Ryzen 7 260 is 100-000001724, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 is X1P46100.
• Percentile: The Ryzen 7 260 ranks in the 88th percentile, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 in the 50th.
• Average Benchmark Score: The Ryzen 7 260 has 43717, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 0.
• Manufacturer: The Ryzen 7 260 is made by AMD, the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no manufacturer listed.

Both processors share the same 4 nm process node from TSMC, dual-channel memory bus, non-ECC memory support, locked multipliers, and active production status. Both have 8 cores and are aimed at the mobile market segment.