AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 enters this comparison with a substantial benchmark record, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded scores in the database. This absence of data for the Intel part means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the AMD processor's measured performance across a range of workloads.

The Ryzen 7 260 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,211.5 points, with a single-core score of 1,770.5 points. In the older Cinebench R15 test, it records 2,747.5 points multi-core and 276.5 points single-core. These results place the chip at the 88th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 43,717.

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 7 260, based on average score, are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 at 43,704, the AMD Ryzen 7 170 at 43,689, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 at 43,431, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 at 43,326. The delta percentages are minimal: 0%, 0.1%, 0.7%, and 0.9% respectively. This indicates the Ryzen 7 260 sits in a tightly contested performance cluster, with less than a 1% separation from its closest competitors.

PassMark results for the Ryzen 7 260 show a multi-thread score of 28,078 and a single-thread score of 3,736. Data compression reaches 351,517, while data encryption scores 20,267. Extended instructions yield 26,544, floating point math records 59,462, and integer math produces 96,737. The physics test scores 1,218, random string sorting hits 42,383, and prime number finding returns 77.

Since the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries, the database cannot compute win counts for either processor. The winsA and winsB fields both stand at zero. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, meaning no direct test-by-test comparison data exists between these two specific models.

The Intel part's percentile rank of 50 suggests it sits at the median of the database, but without actual scores, this figure cannot be interpreted against the AMD chip's 88th percentile placement. The Ryzen 7 260's recorded data shows a processor that outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database, while the Intel i5-14401TE's position remains unverified by direct measurements.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear asymmetry. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has extensive benchmark coverage, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has none. Any purchasing decision between these two must account for this information gap.

For users who prioritize verified performance, the Ryzen 7 260 is the only option with measurable results. Its 88th percentile ranking and average score of 43,717 confirm it as a capable processor in the database's broader context. The chip's nearest rivals, all AMD parts, sit within 0.9% of its average score, suggesting consistent performance within its segment.

The Intel i5-14401TE, with a 50th percentile rank but no recorded scores, cannot be positioned relative to the AMD part. Its specifications exist in the database, but performance remains unquantified. Users considering this Intel chip would be working without benchmark evidence.

The Ryzen 7 260's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, provide a structural advantage on paper. The Intel chip offers 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.50 GHz boost clock. These specification differences favor the AMD part in multi-threaded scenarios, but the lack of Intel benchmark data prevents confirmation.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The transistor count is listed at 25,000 million, with a die size of 178 mm². This chip belongs to the Ryzen 7 generation, specifically Zen 4 (Hawk Point).

The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. Its die size is 215 mm², with no transistor count recorded. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Cache configurations differ notably between the two. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a larger aggregate cache pool, but the AMD chip's smaller process node allows for higher clock speeds at the same 45 W TDP.

Memory support splits the two as well. The Ryzen 7 260 supports only DDR5 with dual-channel access, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. The Intel i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel access, and it does support ECC memory. No memory bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel part.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support offers higher potential bandwidth for compatible devices, though the AMD part provides more lanes at the older standard.

Integrated graphics also diverge. The Ryzen 7 260 includes Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730. Both processors have their graphics built in, but no benchmark comparisons exist for these iGPU units.

The AMD chip targets the mobile market segment with an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip targets the desktop segment with an Intel Socket 1700. This fundamental difference affects system compatibility and form factor choices.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE boosts to 4.50 GHz. The AMD part has a 0.60 GHz advantage in peak clock speed.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel processor supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node difference between these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD chip's smaller node allows for higher clock speeds at the same TDP.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 supports only DDR5 memory. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 ranks at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE ranks at the 50th percentile. However, the Intel chip has no recorded benchmark scores, so this percentile may not reflect measured performance.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 wins in scenarios that benefit from its higher core count, faster clock speeds, and smaller process node. With 8 cores versus 6, and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, the AMD chip should handle multi-threaded workloads more effectively. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports data-intensive tasks, and the Radeon 780M integrated graphics provide a stronger baseline for light graphical work compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 730.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins in scenarios that value its specific feature set. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows flexibility in system building, and ECC memory support makes it suitable for stability-critical applications like file servers or workstations where data integrity is paramount. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides newer connectivity options, and the larger 20 MB L3 cache could benefit workloads with high cache locality.

The AMD chip's mobile market segment indicates it targets laptops and compact systems, where its 45 W TDP and FP8 socket fit portable designs. The Intel chip's desktop segment and Socket 1700 target traditional tower systems, where its larger die size and older process node are less of a concern.

For users running heavily threaded applications such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the Ryzen 7 260's 8 cores and 16 threads, verified by Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 17,211.5, present a strong case. For users requiring ECC memory or DDR4 compatibility, the Intel i5-14401TE offers features the AMD chip simply does not provide.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 260 | Intel Core i5-14401TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-06-30 |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

The two processors share a 45 W TDP, dual-channel memory buses, and locked multipliers. Neither chip has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. The AMD part's newer release date and smaller process node contrast with the Intel part's older node and larger die, while the Intel chip offers ECC support and broader memory compatibility.