AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a full Passmark benchmark suite for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data for the Snapdragon means a direct numerical comparison is only possible in one direction: the AMD processor's results stand alone, with its performance profile measured against its nearest rivals in the database.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G delivers a Passmark single-thread score of 3366. Its multithread score reaches 23858. The integer math test returns 90270, while floating point math scores 50778. Data encryption completes at 19450, and data compression scores 295730. Extended instructions produce a score of 20487. Find prime numbers returns 58, random string sorting scores 32771, and the physics test yields 1022.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 49196, placing it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database. This percentile indicates the chip outperforms the vast majority of recorded processors. Its nearest rivals confirm its standing: the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 averages 49228, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G sits essentially level with it. The Intel Core i5-14600KF averages 49394, a delta of -0.4%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 averages 48995, a delta of 0.4%, showing the Ryzen 7 PRO edges ahead. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H averages 48698, a delta of 1%, again favoring the AMD chip.

Since the Snapdragon X1P-46-100 carries no benchmark entries, its average score is recorded as 0, and its percentile sits at 50. The database lists no nearest rivals for it. Consequently, every head-to-head win in the recorded data belongs to the AMD processor, though that conclusion follows from the absence of Snapdragon measurements rather than from a direct test.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G compare to its closest rivals in average score?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49196. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 by 0.1% (49228) and the Intel Core i5-14600KF by 0.4% (49394). It leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.4% (48995) and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 1% (48698).

Q: What is the Snapdragon X1P-46-100's performance percentile?

A: The Snapdragon X1P-46-100 sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score recorded as 0 because no benchmark entries exist for it.

Q: What are the thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth rating?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G supports DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Does either processor use unlocked multipliers?

A: Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both are recorded as multiplierUnlocked: false.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G wins in every measured benchmark category because the database contains no benchmark results for the Snapdragon X1P-46-100. Within the AMD's own results, the strongest relative showings come in data compression (295730) and integer math (90270), both of which are demanding throughput tests. The floating point math score of 50778 and the multithread score of 23858 further indicate a processor comfortable with parallel workloads. The single-thread score of 3366 shows solid per-core performance as well, and the 90th percentile overall placement confirms it belongs near the top of the database.

The Snapdragon X1P-46-100, by contrast, has no recorded wins because no scores exist. Its 50th percentile placement is a default value tied to that missing data, not a measured outcome. The chip's market segment is Mobile, and its specifications point toward a different usage profile: a lower 30 TDP versus the AMD's 65, a 4 nm process node versus 7 nm, and a higher memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. These features suggest efficiency and memory throughput advantages, but the database does not include benchmark measurements to confirm performance in those areas.

For users focused on recorded CPU benchmark data, the AMD part is the only one with measurable results. For those considering the Snapdragon, the available facts cover its architecture and memory support, but not its computational output.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses 8 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ: 3.80 GHz for AMD versus 3.40 GHz for Qualcomm. Boost clocks differ: 4.60 GHz versus 4.00 GHz. TDP ratings differ substantially: 65 for the AMD and 30 for the Qualcomm.

The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Qualcomm uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. The AMD's process node is 7 nm from TSMC, while the Qualcomm's is 4 nm from TSMC. The AMD has a transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm²; the Qualcomm has no recorded transistor count or die size.

Cache hierarchies differ. The AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. The Qualcomm has 288 KB L1 per core, 12 MB L2 per module, and 6 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs: the AMD uses DDR4, the Qualcomm uses LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but bandwidth differs: 51.2 GB/s for AMD versus 135.2 GB/s for Qualcomm. PCIe support differs: the AMD has Gen 3 with 16 lanes, the Qualcomm has Gen 4 with 12 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD uses Radeon Vega 8, the Qualcomm uses Adreno X1-45. Market segments differ: the AMD is Desktop, the Qualcomm is Mobile. Release dates are close: the AMD released on 2024-09-04, the Qualcomm on 2024-09-02. Part numbers differ: 100-000001748 for AMD, X1P46100 for Qualcomm.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G belongs to the 5000 series and uses the Zen 3 architecture under the codename Cezanne. Its generation is recorded as Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)). The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation. The AMD's process node is 7 nm from TSMC, while the Qualcomm's is 4 nm from TSMC, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process for the Qualcomm part.

The AMD has a transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm². The Qualcomm has no recorded transistor count or die size. Cache organization also differs at a structural level. The AMD uses per-core L1 and L2 caches (64 KB and 512 KB respectively) with a shared 16 MB L3. The Qualcomm uses per-core L1 (288 KB) and per-module L2 (12 MB), with a 6 MB shared L3. This suggests different design philosophies: the AMD's larger L3 favors shared data access patterns, while the Qualcomm's larger per-core L1 and per-module L2 may reduce latency for individual cores.

The AMD supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Qualcomm supports LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, but with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth, more than double the AMD's throughput. PCIe generations differ as well: the AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Qualcomm provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes. The AMD's integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8; the Qualcomm's are Adreno X1-45.

Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD's market segment is Desktop, while the Qualcomm's is Mobile, which aligns with their TDP ratings of 65 and 30 respectively.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear choice only for users who require measured CPU benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has a complete Passmark suite and a 90th percentile ranking, with an average score of 49196. It matches or slightly edges its nearest rivals: within 0.1% of the Ryzen 9 7900, within 0.4% of the Core i5-14600KF, and ahead of the Core Ultra 5 245 by 0.4% and the Xeon Gold 5318H by 1%. This places it as a strong desktop processor in the database.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no benchmark scores, an average of 0, and a 50th percentile default. Its specifications show a mobile-oriented design: a 30 TDP, 4 nm process, 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and LPDDR5X support. These features suggest efficiency and memory advantages, but the database cannot confirm their impact without measurements.

Users selecting between the two should note the AMD's verified performance and desktop focus versus the Qualcomm's unmeasured mobile profile. The AMD delivers recorded results across single-thread, multithread, and specialized tests. The Qualcomm offers architectural attributes that may prove beneficial in its intended mobile segment, but no data in the database substantiates its computational performance. For benchmark-driven decisions, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is the only option with evidence of performance.