AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits cleanly between these two processors, though one side has far more recorded measurements. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 holds an 88th percentile ranking across all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14501E sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap alone suggests a substantial performance separation, but the absence of any direct benchmark entries for the Intel part means the comparison relies on the AMD processor's recorded scores and the architectural data available for both.

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 delivers its strongest results in multithreaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17211.5 points and the Cinebench R15 multicore result of 2747.5 points place it firmly in the upper tier of mobile processors. The PassMark multithread score of 28078 reinforces this pattern, with the integer math score of 96737 and floating point math score of 59462 showing balanced compute capability across both integer and floating point operations. The data compression score of 351517 is particularly notable, indicating strong throughput in compression and archival workloads.

The AMD part also shows respectable single-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1770.5 points and the Cinebench R15 single-core result of 276.5 points, combined with a PassMark single-thread score of 3736, demonstrate that the Zen 4 architecture handles lightly threaded workloads effectively. The PassMark physics score of 1218 and the extended instructions score of 26544 round out the performance picture.

For the Intel Core i5-14501E, the database contains no recorded benchmark scores. The processor's 50th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of zero indicate that no measured performance data exists in the database to evaluate its wins directly. The comparison therefore centers on architectural differences, specifications, and the AMD processor's benchmark results as the only measured performance evidence available.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 uses the Zen 4 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm² and no transistor count recorded in the database.

Core configurations differ significantly. The AMD processor packs 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor offers 6 cores and 12 threads. This 2-core and 4-thread advantage for AMD directly influences multithreaded performance potential. Clock speeds tell a more nuanced story: the AMD part has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel part has a lower base clock of 3.30 GHz but a slightly higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel processor can reach a higher peak frequency on individual cores, but the AMD processor maintains a higher base frequency across all cores.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure and total capacity. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14501E provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a larger per-core L1 and L2 allocation and a larger shared L3 pool, which could benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads despite the lower core count.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory exclusively through a dual-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory support also differs: the AMD part does not support ECC, while the Intel part does.

Connectivity and integrated graphics present further distinctions. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 uses AMD Socket FP8 with PCIe Gen 4 across 20 CPU lanes and integrates a Radeon 780M GPU. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 across 16 CPU lanes and integrates UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part offers more PCIe lanes but on an older generation, while the Intel part offers fewer lanes on the newer PCIe Gen 5 standard. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor targets desktop systems.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen 7 260 and the Intel Core i5-14501E. The wins counter shows zero for both processors in matched testing. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on the AMD processor's absolute scores and the architectural differences between the two parts.

The AMD Ryzen 7 260's nearest rivals in the database provide useful context for interpreting its performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 sits at an average score of 43704 with a delta of 0 percent, essentially matching the Ryzen 7 260's average benchmark score of 43717. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 scores 43689 with a delta of 0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 43431 with a delta of 0.7 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43326 with a delta of 0.9 percent. All four nearest rivals are AMD parts, and the Ryzen 7 260 leads each by a narrow margin. The largest gap among these rivals is 0.9 percent over the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, while the smallest is a virtual tie with the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.

The recorded Cinebench scores for the AMD Ryzen 7 260 indicate strong sustained multithreaded performance. The R23 multicore score of 17211.5 points represents the processor's capability under full-load rendering workloads, while the R15 multicore score of 2747.5 points provides an older-generation comparison point. The single-core scores of 1770.5 in R23 and 276.5 in R15 show the Zen 4 architecture's efficiency at modest power levels, consistent with the 45 W TDP.

PassMark results for the AMD part cover a range of specialized workloads. The data encryption score of 20267, random string sorting score of 42383, and find prime numbers score of 77 illustrate different computational patterns. The floating point math score of 59462 and integer math score of 96737 indicate that integer operations run roughly 63 percent faster than floating point operations on this processor. The extended instructions score of 26544 reflects SIMD and vector processing capability.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is 0.10 GHz higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 260's boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has a TDP of 45 W, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 W. The AMD processor consumes 20 W less.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 260 has an average benchmark score of 43717 and ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14501E has an average benchmark score of 0 and ranks in the 50th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501E uses 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ by 0.50 GHz in favor of AMD (3.80 GHz versus 3.30 GHz), while boost clocks differ by 0.10 GHz in favor of Intel (5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz).

The TDP difference is substantial: the AMD part draws 45 W, the Intel part draws 65 W. Socket compatibility is entirely separate, with AMD using Socket FP8 and Intel using Socket 1700. The process nodes reflect different manufacturing approaches: AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process with a 178 mm² die and 25,000 million transistors, while Intel uses its 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die and no recorded transistor count.

Cache configurations differ at every level. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the AMD part supports only DDR5. ECC memory support exists only on the Intel side. The AMD processor records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

PCIe and integrated graphics round out the differences. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes and a Radeon 780M iGPU. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes and UHD Graphics 770. The market segments differ: the AMD Ryzen 7 260 is a mobile processor, while the Intel Core i5-14501E is a desktop processor. The AMD part released on 2025-01-05, while the Intel part released on 2024-06-30. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to the AMD Ryzen 7 260 as the stronger performer in multithreaded and single-threaded workloads alike, based on its substantial benchmark scores and 88th percentile ranking. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 45 W TDP delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17211.5 points and a PassMark multithread score of 28078, figures that place it well above the Intel Core i5-14501E's 50th percentile standing. The AMD processor also leads its nearest rivals in the database by margins of 0 to 0.9 percent, confirming its position at the top of its immediate performance class.

The Intel Core i5-14501E offers compensations on paper that the benchmark data cannot confirm. Its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, larger L3 cache of 24 MB, ECC memory support, and DDR4 compatibility make it a flexible option for specific desktop use cases. The PCIe Gen 5 connectivity provides newer I/O standards, and the desktop market segment suggests a different deployment context than the AMD mobile part. However, with no recorded benchmark scores in the database, the Intel processor's actual performance cannot be verified against the AMD part's measured results.

The choice between these two processors depends on the workload and platform requirements. The AMD Ryzen 7 260 demonstrates superior measured performance across every recorded benchmark category, with a higher core count, lower power draw, and a 0.9 percent or better standing against its nearest rivals. The Intel Core i5-14501E counters with a higher boost clock, larger caches, broader memory compatibility, and ECC support, but the database contains no evidence of its real-world performance. For applications where measured results matter, the AMD Ryzen 7 260 is the only processor with verified performance data. For desktop builds requiring DDR4 support, ECC memory, or PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, the Intel Core i5-14501E presents specification advantages that the current data does not quantify.