AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 9 270H Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the performance gap in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H scores 18000, which is 31.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS's 12342.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-threaded PassMark performance?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H scores 3944, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 2740. This gives the Intel part a 30.5% advantage in the passmark_single_thread test.

Q: What is the difference in the average benchmark score between the two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H has an average benchmark score of 38335, placing it in the 86th percentile. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average score of 19364, placing it in the 73rd percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS's 4.40 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 9 270H supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, using a 6 nm process from TSMC. It uses the AMD Socket FP7 and has a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-H, built on a 10 nm process from Intel. It uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket.

The core configurations differ substantially. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel part has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a lower base clock of 2.70 GHz but a significantly higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The TDP also differs, with the AMD chip rated at 35 W and the Intel chip at 45 W.

Cache layouts are distinct. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 9 270H has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel processor a larger total cache footprint across all levels.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD chip uses dual-channel DDR5 with a measured memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for it. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity shows a notable divergence. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 9 270H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Both processors are unlocked in the sense that the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported. The AMD part has two part numbers listed, while the Intel part has one. The Intel Core 9 270H was released on 2024-12-17, several months after the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, which was released on 2024-08-31.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 9 270H wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The margin varies considerably by workload type.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel processor scores 2464 in multi-core versus 1243 for the AMD part, a 49.6% gap. Single-core R15 shows the same 49.6% delta, with scores of 347 and 175 respectively. The R20 suite shows a similar pattern: Intel leads 10268 to 5183 in multi-core (49.5% delta) and 1449 to 731 in single-core (49.6% delta).

The R23 results show a narrower margin. The Intel Core 9 270H scores 18000 in multi-core, which is 31.4% ahead of the AMD's 12342. Single-core R23 shows a 14.6% delta, with Intel at 2040 and AMD at 1742. This suggests the Intel advantage shrinks in longer sustained workloads, particularly in single-thread performance.

PassMark results show the widest gaps. In floating point math, Intel scores 70640 versus 27800 for AMD, a 60.6% delta, the largest margin in the entire comparison. Physics shows a 58.2% delta (1966 versus 821). Find prime numbers shows a 57.1% delta (112 versus 48). Random string sorting shows a 52.1% delta (36867 versus 17669).

Data compression shows Intel at 333785 versus 168692 for AMD, a 49.5% delta. Integer math shows 97654 versus 50800, a 48% delta. Data encryption shows 19369 versus 10718, a 44.7% delta. Extended instructions show 20079 versus 11219, a 44.1% delta. Multi-threaded PassMark shows 28764 versus 14520, a 49.5% delta.

The smallest margins appear in single-thread tests. PassMark single-thread scores 3944 for Intel and 2740 for AMD, a 30.5% delta. This is consistent with the R23 single-core result, which showed the closest margin of all tests at 14.6%.

The average benchmark score reflects the overall dominance. Intel's 38335 is roughly double AMD's 19364. The Intel part sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part sits in the 73rd percentile.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear hierarchy. The Intel Core 9 270H outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS in every single recorded benchmark. The average benchmark score of 38335 places the Intel part in the 86th percentile, which is 13 percentile points higher than the AMD's 73rd percentile.

The Intel processor's closest rivals, according to the database, are the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.1% delta), the Intel Xeon w3-2525 (0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX (0.2% delta). The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS's closest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (0% delta) and the Intel Core i7-8700K (0.7% delta). This places the two chips in different performance tiers entirely.

The Intel Core 9 270H is the choice for anyone who prioritizes raw performance in multi-threaded workloads, floating point math, physics calculations, and data compression. Its 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, deliver decisive advantages across the board. The 45 W TDP is higher, but the performance per benchmark point favors the Intel part substantially.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, with its 35 W TDP and 6 nm process, offers a lower power envelope and a smaller die size (208 mm² versus no recorded die size for Intel). It is the more efficient option on paper, though the database does not record power consumption measurements. Its performance is adequate for everyday tasks, but it trails the Intel part by 30% to 60% depending on the workload.

For buyers who need the fastest mobile processor in the database's records, the Intel Core 9 270H is the clear pick. For those who prioritize lower power draw and a smaller physical footprint, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS remains a viable option, but the benchmark data gives no reason to choose it on performance grounds alone.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core 9 270H |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 5.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-H |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-12-17 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $697 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 270H wins in every benchmark category recorded. The largest margins are in floating point math (60.6% ahead), physics (58.2% ahead), and prime number finding (57.1% ahead). These results indicate a strong advantage in scientific computing, simulation, and any workload that relies heavily on floating point operations. The data compression test also shows a 49.5% lead, which benefits file archiving and database workloads. Data encryption shows a 44.7% lead, which matters for security-related tasks.

The Intel part's multi-core advantages are consistent across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, with deltas ranging from 31.4% to 49.6%. The 14-core configuration with 20 threads provides a substantial throughput advantage over the 6-core, 12-thread AMD part. The higher boost clock of 5.80 GHz also gives the Intel chip a 30.5% lead in PassMark single-thread performance and a 14.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has no benchmark wins in the dataset. However, its 35 W TDP is 10 W lower than the Intel part, which suggests it may be suited for thinner laptops with smaller cooling solutions. The 6 nm TSMC process node is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node, which could contribute to better power efficiency in sustained workloads. The AMD part also uses a smaller die size at 208 mm², which may offer packaging flexibility.

For GPU-adjacent workloads, the AMD part uses Radeon 660M integrated graphics, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The database does not record graphics benchmarks, so no comparison can be made on that front. The AMD chip's memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is recorded, while the Intel chip's is not, so no direct comparison is possible there either.

The practical takeaway is straightforward. The Intel Core 9 270H is the performance leader across all measured metrics. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS offers a lower TDP and a more compact die, but the recorded data shows no workload where it outperforms the Intel part. For users who need maximum compute throughput in a mobile platform, the Intel chip is the only choice based on these measurements.